Abstract
Seed is an important input in production of field crops. The successful production of sugar from sugar beet depends on high yielding varieties, optimum plant establishment after sowing and good agricultural practices. Therefore, seed with the highest germination ability and vigour is necessary to ensure an early and high level of field emergence. Knowledge of the genetic control of seed characters may help breeders to efficiently select for improved germination. In this research, variance components and inheritance of sugar beet seed characteristics were studied. Five monogerm diploid O-Type lines were crossed with 15 monogerm, diploid cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines on the basis of North Carolina Design II (Factorial Design), and 75 F1 hybrids (single crosses) were produced. The hybrids were then compared in three completely randomized designs of 25 entries each. Eight seed traits of F1 hybrids were evaluated in the laboratory in three replications. Based on genetic analysis, the additive variance for rootlet length, hypocotyle length, uniformity of germination and 1,000-germ weight was significant at 5% probability level. Also, the dominance variance was significant at 1% probability level for all the seed traits measured except for germination percentage. Narrow-sense heritabilities of rootlet and hypocotyle lengths were significant at 5% probability level. Correlation analysis showed that germination speed and hypocotyle length were positively and negatively correlated with germination uniformity, respectively, at 1% probability level. These results indicated that there was a remarkable genetic variation for the seed traits which could be exploited by selection and heterosis breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battle JP, Whittington WJ (1971) Genetic variability in time to germination of sugar-beet clusters. J Agric Sci 76:27–32
Biancardi E, McGrath JM, Panella LW, Lewellen RT, Stevanato P (2010) Sugar Beet. In: Bradshaw JE (ed) Root and tuber crops, Handbook of plant breeding, vol 7. Springer, New York, pp 173–219
Bolelova ZA, Pavlenko EA, Chemechenko LI, Kirsanova YV (1984) Viability of hybrid sugar beet seeds as determined by the levels of ploidy and homozygosity of the pollinator.Vestnik Sel’ Skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki Moscow. USSR 7:107–111
Bradford KJ, Steiner JJ, Trawatha SE (1990) Seed priming influence on germination and emergence of pepper seed lots. Crop Sci 30:718–721
Brown SJ (1980) Variation in germination and seedling emergence of sugar beet at sub-optimal temperatures. Annal Appl Biol 95:143–150
Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumtou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H (1999) Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 98:1194–1201
Doney DL (1993) Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet. J Sugar Beet Res 30:209–219
Durrant MJ, Gummerson RJ (1990) Factors associated with germination of sugar-beet seed in the standard test and establishment in the field. Seed Sci Technol 18:1–10
Ecker R, Barzilay A, Osherenko E (1994) The genetic relations between length of time to germination and seed dormancy in lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum). Euphytica 80:125–128
Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies TF (1990) Principal of propagation by seed: plant propagation, principals and practices. Prentice Hall International Inc., New York
Harveson RM, Hein GL, Smith JA, Wilson RG, Yonts CD (2002) An integrated approach to cultivar evaluation and selection for improving sugar beet profitability. Plant Dis 86:192–204
Kirsanova YV, Babyazh IA (1988) Study of embryogenesis and seed quality in triploid hybrids of sugar beet produced using diploid and tetraploid male sterile (MS) components. Tsitogeneticheskieitesitoemberiologicheskie issledovaniya V Selektsii Sakharnoi Svekly 104–113
Kockelmann A, Tilcher R, Fischer U (2011) Seed production and processing. Sugar Technol. doi:10.1007/s12355-010-0039-z
McGrath JM, Saccomani M, Stevanato P, Biancardi E (2007) Beet. In: Kole C (ed) Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Vegetables, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, pp 191–207
Rostel LJ (1977) Problems and possibilities in the improvement of germination capacity of monocarp 3x sugar beet hybrid by means of breeding, seed preparation and seed production. Archiv fur Zuchtungsforschung 5:109–121
Sadeghi H, Khazaei F, Sheidaei S, Yari L (2011) Effect of seed size on seed germination behavior of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Agric Biol Sci 6:5–8
Sadeghian SY, Khodaii H (1998) Diallel cross analysis of seed germination traits in sugar beet. Euphytica 103:259–263
Sedlmayr TE (1960) Inheritance of speed of germination in sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Dissertation, Michigan State University
Slavov K (1981) Effect of the distance of the maternal plant from the pollinator on hybrid seed production in sugar beet. Resteniev dni Nauki 18:61–67
Slyusarenko ZS, Petrushina MP (1987) Cytoembryological expression of incompatibility in the production of sugar beet. Dostizheniya I perspektivy V selektsii sakharnoi svekly 42–51
Snyder FW (1959) Influence of the seed ball on speed of germination of sugar beet seeds. Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol J 10:513–520
Zakhriev A (1990) Effect of the maternal and pollen parent on the formation of normally developed but ungerminating (hard) seeds in some triploid hybrids of sugar beet. Rasteniev dni Nauki 27:72–76
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBBI), Karaj, Iran. The authors thank Dr. S.Y. Sadeghian for supplying the seeds of the male and female lines which were used in this study to develop single cross hybrids. The authors are also grateful to Dr. M. Dehghanshoar for his helpful advice throughout the study. Thanks also go to Dr. R. Amiri for assistance in statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yousefabadi, V., Rajabi, A. Study on inheritance of seed technological characteristics in sugar beet. Euphytica 186, 367–376 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0615-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0615-7