Abstract
Elite cultivars of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai) are high in fruit quality but may not be the highest yielders. The objective of this study was to estimate the heritability of, and genotypic and phenotypic correlations among, yield traits in two watermelon populations developed from crosses between obsolete cultivars with high yield and elite modern cultivars. Field trials were conducted at two locations in North Carolina (Clinton and Kinston). The data were analyzed by regressing S0:1 progeny data on S0 parent data to estimate narrow-sense heritability. Narrow-sense heritability estimates were low for all traits measured [total fruit weight (0.04–0.12), marketable fruit weight (0.06–0.15), total fruit number (0.04–0.16), fruit size (0.18–0.19), and percent culls (0.02–0.09) in North Carolina Watermelon 1 (NCWP1) and North Carolina Watermelon 2 (NCWP2) populations, respectively]. Estimates of broad-sense heritability were higher than estimates of narrow-sense heritability. Total fruit weight and marketable fruit weight were highly correlated (r g = 0.97–1.00). Marketable fruit weight and fruit size used as single selection criteria in NCWP1 and total fruit number in NCWP2, were predicted to give the best correlated response for total fruit weight. Narrow-sense heritability was low for fruit yield; therefore, watermelon breeders should select based on replicated progeny rows in multiple environments to maximize gain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Abbreviations
- Mark:
-
Marketable
- Wt.:
-
Weight
- No.:
-
Number
- TSS:
-
Total soluble solids
References
Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Bansal R, Sooch BS, Dhall RK (2002a) Heterosis in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Environ Ecol 20(4):976–979
Bansal R, Sooch BS, Dhall RK (2002b) Combining ability analysis in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Environ Ecol 20(4):965–969
Bohren BB, Hill WG, Robertson A (1966) Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses. Genet Res 7:44–57
Brar JS, Sidhu AS (1977) Heterosis and combining ability of earliness and quality characters in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). J Res Punjab Agr Univ 14:272–278
Brar JS, Sukhija BS (1977) Hybrid vigor in inter-varietal crosses in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Indian J Hort 34:277–283
Casler MD (1982) Genotype × environment interaction bias to parent-offspring regression heritability estimates. Crop Sci 22:540–542
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Technical, Essex
Frey KJ, Horner T (1957) Heritability in standard units. Agron J 49:59–62
Gill BS, Kumar JC (1986) Variability in genetic stock and heritable components in watermelon. J Res Punjab Agr Univ 23(4):583–588
Gopal YH, Shankar CR, Reddy BK (1996) Combining ability studies in watermelon. New Bot 23:167–173
Gusmini G, Wehner TC (2005) Foundations of yield improvement in watermelon. Crop Sci 45:141–146
Gusmini G, Wehner TC (2007) Heritability and genetic variance estimates for fruit weight in watermelon. HortScience 42(6):1332–1336
Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Holland JB, Nyquist WE, Cervantes-Martinez CT (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update. Plant Breed Rev 22:9–112
Kumar R (2009) Inheritance of fruit yield and other horticulturally important traits in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thumb.) Matsum. & Nakai]. Disssertation, NC State University
Lamkey KR (1992) Fifty years of recurrent selection in the iowa stiff stalk synthetic maize population. Maydica 37:19–28
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Assoc Inc, Sunderland
Maynard DN (2001) Watermelons, characteristics, production and marketing. ASHS Press, Alexandria
Moon SS, Verma VK, Munshi AD (2004) Gene action for yield and its components in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Ann Agr Res New Series 25(1):24–29
Nyquist WE (1991) Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Crit Rev in Plant Sci 10:235–322
Prasad L, Gautam NC, Singh SP (1988) Studies on genetic variability and character association in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Veg Sci 15(1):86–94
Sanders DC (2004) Vegetable crop guidelines for the Southeastern U.S. 2004–2005. North Carolina Veg Growers Assn, Raleigh 1–215
SAS Institute (2002) SAS for windows, release 9.1. SAS Inst, Cary
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (completed samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Smith JD, Kinman ML (1965) The use of parent-offspring regression as an estimator of heritability. Crop Sci 5:595–596
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston
US Department of Agriculture (2007) Agricultural statistics for 2006. US Department of Agriculture, Washington
Vashistha RN, Pratap PS, Pandita ML (1983) Studies on variability and heritability in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Haryana Agr Univ J Res 12(2):319–324
Weyhrich RA, Lamkey KR, Halauer AR (1998) Responses to seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci 38:308–321
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. Tammy Ellington for assistance with the field tests and pollinations in the greenhouses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, R., Wehner, T.C. Inheritance of fruit yield in two watermelon populations in North Carolina. Euphytica 182, 275–283 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0503-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0503-1


