Skip to main content
Log in

Combining management and breeding advances to improve field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is widely grown across southern Australia. Delayed sowing is recommended to minimise yield losses caused by the disease ascochyta blight. However, drier and hotter springs in recent seasons have resulted in greater yield penalties from delayed sowing than from this disease. Field pea breeding in these shorter growing seasons has rapidly shifted the selection intensity towards genotypes with earlier flowering. Research was conducted to identify optimal management strategies that reduce losses from both disease and delayed sowing. Experiments comprising differing sowing dates (conventional, and 2–3 and 4–6 weeks earlier), various genotypes (including Alma—tall trailing type, and Kaspa—semi-leafless erect and OZP0602—earlier flowering, semi-leafless) and six fungicide treatments (combinations of P-Pickel T® seed dressing and mancozeb foliar fungicide) were conducted in multi-location sites in South Australia from 2007 to 2009. Ascochyta blight infection occurred in all years irrespective of treatment and location, but only reduced grain yield in one experiment in 2008 and two in 2009. The two earlier sowing dates were generally higher yielding than the conventional sowing date for all genotypes. However under severe disease pressure yield loss was observed with the earliest sowing date. Genotype differences were also observed in terms of yield response to sowing date and in levels of disease infection, although these small improvements in disease resistance did not translate to a yield advantage. The combination of seed treatment and strategic foliar fungicides resulted in a positive yield response in 2009 but this was variable between sowing dates and genotypes. Under recent weather patterns of lower rainfall and shorter growing seasons, this study suggested the optimum planting period is within a week of the first autumn rains in low rainfall regions and 3 weeks after the first autumn rains in medium and medium–high rainfall regions. Grain yield can be optimised in these conditions by using earlier flowering genotypes together with strategic fungicide application and early time of sowing. These earlier flowering genotypes were also found to have broader adaptation to a range of sowing dates providing increased management flexibility. Fungicides with greater efficacy than mancozeb are required to maximise yield at the earliest sowing time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong EL, Mathews PW, Gaynor LG, Menz I, Armstrong BC (2008) Stem nodes—the central building blocks of growth and yield in field pea. In: Unkovick (ed) Global issues, paddock action, proceedings of the 14th Australian agronomy conference, Adelaide, South Australia

  • Bretag TW, Ramsey MD (2001) Ascochyta spp. In: Kraft JM, Pfleger FL (eds) Compendium of pea diseases and pests, 2nd edn. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, pp 24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag TW, Keane PJ, Price TV (2000) Effect of sowing date on the severity of ascochyta blight in field peas (Pisum sativum L.) grown in the Wimmera region of Victoria. Aust J Exp Agric 40:1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag TW, Keane PJ, Price TV (2006) The epidemiology and control of ascochyta blight in field peas: a review. Aust J Agric Res 57:883–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Meteorology Commonwealth of Australia (2010) http://www.bom.gov.au. Accessed 19th April 2010

  • Davidson JA, Ramsey MD (2000) Pea yield decline syndrome in South Australia: the role of diseases and the impact of agronomic practices. Aust J Agric Res 51:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson JA, Kimber RBE, Krysinska-Kaczmarek M (2004) Pulse diseases in 2003—what can we learn. In: Kaminskas D, Rawlings S (eds) South Australian grains research update 2004. Jon Lamb Communications, St Peters, pp 119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson JA, Hartley D, Priest M, Krysinska-Kaczmarek M, Herdina MK, McKay A, Scott ES (2009) A new species of Phoma causes ascochyta blight symptoms on field peas (Pisum sativum) in South Australia. Mycologia 101:120–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischke B, McMurray L (2001) Three years of field peas on upper EP. In: Doudle S, Frischke B, Frishke A (eds) Eyre Peninsula Farming Systems 2001 summary. Eyre Peninsula Farming Systems, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, Minnipa, pp 38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulwood P (2010) Crop and pasture reports. Primary Industries and Resources South Australia, Government of South Australia. http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/grains/cpr. Accessed 22 April 2010

  • Hawthorne W, Davidson JA, McMurray L, Armstrong E, MacLeod W, Bretag TW (2003) Field pea disease management strategy for southern and western regions. Disease management guide series. Pulse Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Heenan DP (1994) Effects of sowing time on growth and grain yield of lupin and field pea in south-eastern New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric 34:1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le May C, Schoeny A, Tivoli B, Ney B (2005) Improvement and validation of a pea crop growth model to simulate the growth of cultivars infected with Ascochtya blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes). Eur J Plant Pathol 112:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald G, Peck D (2009) Effects of crop rotation, residue retention and sowing time on the incidence and survival of ascochyta blight and its effect on grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Res 111:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray LS (2002) Peas-2002 variety trials. In: Wheeler R, McMurray LS (eds) South Australian field crop evaluation programme post harvest report 2002/03. South Australian Government, Adelaide, pp 39–46

  • McMurray LS, Dare M, Egan J (2007) New pulse varieties and their management—implications for 2007. In: Kaminskas D, Rawlings S (eds) South Australian grains research update 2007. Jon Lamb Communications, St. Peters, pp 143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Peever TL, Barve MT, Stone LJ, Kaiser WJ (2007) Evolutionary relationships among Ascochyta species infecting wild and cultivated hosts in legume tribes Cicereae and Vicieae. Mycologia 99:59–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salam MU, Galloway J, MacLeod WJ, Davidson JA, Seymour M, Pritchard I, Diggle AJ, Maling T (2011) G1 blackspot manager model predicts the maturity and release of ascospores in relation to blackspot disease of field pea. Austral Plant Path (in press)

  • SILO Patched Point Dataset (PPD) (2010) http://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/. Accessed 14 April 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by South Australian Grains Industry Trust with additional funding from Australian Grains Research & Development Corporation. Technical assistance was provided by M. Krysinska-Kaczmarek, C. Wilmshurst and M. Russ of SARDI, Adelaide; John Nairn, Mark Bennie, Rohan Steele, Peter Maynard and Stuart Sherrif of SARDI, Clare; Leigh Davis and Willie Shoobridge of SARDI, Minnipa. Dr. T. Khan, Department of Food and Agriculture, Western Australia, supplied seed of the breeding line WAPEA2211 from Pulse Breeding Australia. Silo patchpoint data was provided by Dr. Peter Hayman and Bronya Alexander, SARDI, Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Davidson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMurray, L.S., Davidson, J.A., Lines, M.D. et al. Combining management and breeding advances to improve field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia. Euphytica 180, 69–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0362-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0362-9

Keywords

Navigation