Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a methodology to forecast the nutritional value of new tomato hybrids

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tomato is a food of great relevance both due to its large-scale consumption and its richness in bioactive components. It is an important component of the traditional Mediterranean diet as well as of other diets. Nowadays, concerns about human health and environment preservation have changed the objectives of tomato breeding. In this study, eight tomato F1 hybrids and their parental lines were analyzed for nutritional properties and agronomic traits using a new selection method that combines biochemical and agronomic evaluation. Eight traits contributing to the nutritional quality of tomato (lycopene, β-carotene, other carotenoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, vitamins C and E, dry residue) and average yield were assessed in fifteen tomato genotypes. Furthermore the pathogen resistances possessed from these genotypes were, also, considered. In order to select valuable tomato hybrids, a nutritional index (IQUAN) and an agronomic index (AI) were calculated. Our results suggested that the IQUAN nutritional index may be very useful to forecast the nutritional value of F1 hybrids based on parental performance. Combining the use of the IQUAN and AI indexes, we were able to select two hybrids (MR 48 and MR 47) that contain considerable amounts of antioxidants and acceptable parameters for commercial production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC (1990) Official method of analysis—vitamins and other nutrients. pp 1058–1060

  • Barone A, Frusciante L (2007) Molecular marker-assisted selection for resistance to pathogens in tomato. In: Marker-assisted selection (MAS) in crops, livestock, forestry and fish: current status and the way forward, FAO, pp 151–164

  • Cantore V, Boari F, Vanadia S, Pace B, De Palma E, Leo L, Zacheo G (2008) Evaluation of yield and qualitative parameters of high lycopene tomato cultivars. Acta Hortic 789:173–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier A, Lean MEJ, McDonald MS, Black C (1997) Quantitative analysis of the flavonoid content of commercial tomatoes, onions, lettuce, and celery. J Agric Food Chem 45:590–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dod VN, Kale PB, Wankhade V (1995) Combining ability for certain quality traits in tomato. Crop Res 9:407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P (2003) Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 83:369–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito F, Arlotti G, Bonifati AM, Napolitano A, Vitale D, Fogliano V (2005) Antioxidant activity and dietary fibre in durum wheat bran by-products. Food Res Int 38:1167–1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etminan M, Takkouche B, Caamano-Isorna F (2004) The role of tomato products and lycopene in the prevention of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13:340–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Favati F, Lovelli S, Galgano F, Miccolis V, Di Tommaso T, Candido V (2009) Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Sci Hortic 122:562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi S, Bidoli E, La Vecchia C, Talamini R, D’Avanzo B, Negri E (1994) Tomatoes and risk of digestive-tract cancers. Int J Cancer 59:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser PD, Pinto ES, Holloway DE, Bramley PM (2000) Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection to the metabolic profiling of plant isoprenoids. Plant J 24:551–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frusciante L, Carli P, Ercolano MR, Pernice R, Di Matteo A, Fogliano V, Pellegrini N (2007) Antioxidant nutritional quality of tomato. Mol Nutr Food Res 51:609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia E, Barret DM (2006) Evaluation of processing tomatoes from two consecutive growing seasons: quality attributes, peelability and yield. J Food Process Preserv 30:20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George B, Kaur C, Khurdiya DS, Kapoor HC (2004) Antioxidants in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) as a function of genotype. Food Chem 84:45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WA (1995) Intake of carotenoids and retinol in relation to risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1767–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazra P, Som MG (1999) Technology for vegetable production and improvement. Naya Prokash, Kolkata, pp 291–318

  • Ho LC (1999) The physiological basis for improving tomato fruit quality. Acta Hortic 487:33–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarret RL, Sayama H, Tigchelaar EC (1995) Pleiotropic effects associated with the chlorophyll intensifier mutations high pigment and dark green in tomatoes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 109:873–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampfenkel K, Van Montagu M, Inze D (1995) Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from plant tissue. Anal Biochem 225:165–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuti JO, Konuru HB (2005) Effects of genotype and cultivation environment on lycopene content in red-ripe tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 85:2021–2026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laterrot H (1987) Near isogenic tomato lines in Moneymaker type with different genes for disease resistances. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 37:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Laterrot H (1996) Breeding strategies for disease resistance in tomatoes with emphasis to the tropics: current status and research challenges. 1st International symposium tropical tomato disease, 21–22 November. Recife, Brazil, pp 126–132

  • Lenucci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G, D’Alessandro G (2006) Antioxidant composition in cherry and high-pigment tomato cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 54:2606–2613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martìnez-Valverde I, Periago MJ, Provan G, Chesson A (2002) Phenolic compounds, lycopene and antioxidant activity in commercial varieties of tomato. J Sci Food Agric 82:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau P, Thoquet P, Olivier J, Laterrot H, Grimsley N (1998) Genetic mapping of Ph-2, a single locus controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:259–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naveen G, Devinder SC, Ajmer SD (2008) Genetics of yield, quality and shelf life characteristics in tomato under normal and late planting conditions. Euphytica 159:275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Periago MJ, Rincon F, Aguera MD, Ros G (2004) Mixture approach for optimizing lycopene extraction from tomato and tomato products. J Agric Food Chem 52:5796–5802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prosky L, Asp NG, Schweizer TF, DeVries JW, Furda I (1998) Determination of unsoluble, soluble, and total dietary bran foods and food products Interlaboratory study. JAOAC 71:1017–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffo A, Leonardi C, Fogliano V, Ambrosino P, Salucci M, Gennaro L, Bugianesi R, Giufridda F, Quaglia G (2000) Nutritional value of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum cv Naomi F1) harvested at different ripening stages. J Agric Food Chem 50:6550–6556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalfi L, Fogliano V, Pentangelo A, Graziani G, Giordano I, Ritieni A (2000) Antioxidant activity and general fruit characteristics in different ecotypes of Corbarini small tomatoes. J Agric Food Chem 48:1363–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Narayan R (2004) Variability studies in tomato under cold arid condition of Ladakh. Hortic J 17:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Siviero P, Sandei L, Zanotti G (2000) Valutazione del contenuto di licopene in ibridi di pomodoro da industria ‘HP’ (high pigment). Inf Agrar 12:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MR, Scott SJ, Gergerich RC (1991) Inheritance of a gene for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) from Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. Euphytica 59:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonucci LH, Holden JM, Beecher GR, Khachik F, Davis CS, Mulokoz G (1995) Carotenoid content of thermally processed tomato-based food products. J Agric Food Chem 43:579–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toor RK, Lister CE, Savage GP (2005) Antioxidant activities of New Zealand-grown tomatoes. Int J Food Sci Nutr 56:597–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburger JH (1998) Evaluation of the evidence on the role of tomato products in disease prevention. Tomato products in disease prevention. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, New York, pp 140–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mark Walters for editing the manuscript, Michele De Martino and Rosa Paparo for their technical assistance. This work was performed in the framework of the Project “Ottenimento di ibridi di pomodoro da mensa ad elevata qualita’ nutrizionale” funded by the Ministry for Agricultural and Forestry Policy (MiPAF) Contribution no. 236 from the DISSPAPA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Ercolano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carli, P., Caruso, G., Fogliano, V. et al. Development of a methodology to forecast the nutritional value of new tomato hybrids. Euphytica 180, 291–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0350-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0350-0

Keywords

Navigation