Euphytica

, Volume 167, Issue 3, pp 271–280 | Cite as

Gamete selection for improving physiological resistance to white mold in common bean

Review

Abstract

White mold (WM), caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, is a widespread disease of dry and green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in North America. Gamete selection (GS) was effective to combine and pyramide resistant genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for common bacterial blight. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of GS to introgress physiological resistance to white mold. Two inter-gene-pool double-cross populations were developed. Selection for WM resistance was practiced from F1 to F4. Thirteen selected F1:5 breeding lines of each population and their four parents were evaluated. Two separate inoculations were made on each plant 1 week apart using a cut-stem method. The WM reaction was scored at 16, 23, and 33 days post inoculation (DPI) using a scale from 1 (no disease) to 9 (severely diseased or dead). In F1, 52% of Pop I (USPT-WM-1/CORN 601//USPT-CBB-1/92BG-7) and 67% of Pop II (Chase/I9365-25//ABL 15/A 195) susceptible plants were discarded. In F4, only 1.2% of families from Pop I, and 0.9% for Pop II, survived the selection process. An average of 20.5% gain in WM resistance was obtained for both populations in F4. Four breeding lines of Pop I had significantly (P = 0.05) lower WM score (4.1–4.6) and four were equal (4.7–4.9) to the best WM-resistant parent 92BG-7 (4.9), while ten breeding lines of Pop II were equal (4.5–4.8) to the best WM-resistant parent A 195 (4.6). Thus, GS was effective for improving WM resistance in common bean.

Keywords

Breeding methods Common bean Gamete selection Introgression Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum White mold resistance 

Abbreviations

BCMV

Bean common mosaic virus

CIAT

Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical

DPI

Days post inoculation

WM

White mold

References

  1. Abawi GS, Provvidenti R, Crosier DC, Hunter JE (1978) Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease in Phaseolus coccineus. J Hered 69:200–202Google Scholar
  2. Asensio-S.-Manzanera MC, Asensio C, Singh SP (2005) Introgressing resistance to bacterial and viral diseases from the Middle American to Andean common bean. Euphytica 143:223–228. doi:10.1007/s10681-005-3860-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asensio-S.-Manzanera MC, Asensio C, Singh SP (2006) Gamete selection for resistance to common and halo bacterial blights in dry bean intergene pool populations. Crop Sci 46:131–135. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett MS (1947) The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39–52. doi:10.2307/3001536 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyne DP, Steadman JR, Anderson FN (1974) Effect of modified plant architecture of great northern dry bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on white mold severity, and components of yield. Plant Dis Reptr 58:379–382Google Scholar
  6. Coyne DP, Nuland DS, Lindgren DT, Steadman JR (1994) ‘Chase’ pinto dry bean. HortScience 29:44–45Google Scholar
  7. Ender M, Kelly JD (2005) Identification of QTL associated with white mold resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 45:2482–2490. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ender M, Terpstra K, Kelly JD (2008) Marker-assisted selection for white mold resistance in common bean. Mol Breed 21:149–157. doi:10.1007/s11032-007-9115-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freyre R, Skroch PW, Gelfroy V, Adam-Blondon AF, Shirmo-hamadali A, Johnson WC, Llaca V, Nodari RO, Pereira PA, Tsai SM, Tohme J, Dron M, Nienhuis J, Vallejos CE, Gepts P (1998) Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 4. Development of a core linkage map and alignment of RFLP maps. Theor Appl Genet 97:847–856. doi:10.1007/s001220050964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuller PA, Coyne DP, Steadman JR (1984) Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease in a diallel cross of dry beans. Crop Sci 24:929–933Google Scholar
  11. Genchev D, Kiryakov I (2002) Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary) in A 195 (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bulg J Agric Sci 8:181–187Google Scholar
  12. Gilmore B, Myers JR, Kean D (2002) Completion of testing of Phaseolus coccineus plant introductions (PIs) for white mold, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, resistance. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 45:64–65Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths PMJ, Dickson M (2004) Cornell 501: a white mold resistant snap bean breeding line. HortScience 39:1507–1508Google Scholar
  14. Kerr ED, Steadman JR, Nelson LA (1978) Estimation of white mold disease reduction of yield and yield components of dry edible beans. Crop Sci 18:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim HS, Hartman GL, Manandhar JB, Graef GL, Steadman JR, Diers BW (2000) Reaction of soybean cultivars to Sclerotinia stem rot in field, greenhouse, and laboratory evaluations. Crop Sci 40:665–669Google Scholar
  16. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2003) QTL conferring resistance and avoidance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 43:539–548Google Scholar
  17. Lyon ME, Dickson MH, Hunter JE (1987) Recurrent selection for resistance to white mold in Phaseolus species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:149–152Google Scholar
  18. McIntosh MS (1983) Analysis of combined experiments. Agron J 75:153–155Google Scholar
  19. Miklas PN (2007) Marker-assisted backcrossing QTL for partial resistance to Sclerotinia white mold in dry bean. Crop Sci 47:935–942. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miklas PN, Grafton KF, Kelly JD, Scwhartz HF, Steadman JR (1998) Registration of four white mold resistant dry bean Germplasm lines: I9365-3, I9365-5, I9365-31 and 92BG-7. Crop Sci 38:1728Google Scholar
  21. Miklas PN, Delorme R, Johnson WC, Gepts P (1999) Dry bean G 122 contributes a major QTL for white mold resistance in the straw test. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 42:43–44Google Scholar
  22. Miklas PN, Delorme R, Johnson WC, Gepts P (2000) Field and straw test reactions to white mold in a RIL population (A 55/G 122). Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 43:76–77Google Scholar
  23. Miklas PN, Delorme R, Johnson WC, Gepts P (2001) QTL conditioning physiological resistance and avoidance to white mold in dry bean. Crop Sci 41:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miklas PN, Delorme R, Riley R (2003) Identification of QTL conditioning resistance to white mold in snap bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:564–570Google Scholar
  25. Miklas PN, Hauf DC, Henson RA, Grafton KF (2004) Inheritance of ICA Bunsi-derived resistance to white mold in a navy × pinto bean cross. Crop Sci 44:1584–1588Google Scholar
  26. Miklas PN, Grafton KF, Hauf DC, Kelly JD (2006) Registration of partial white mold resistant pinto bean germplasm line USPT-WM-1. Crop Sci 46:2339. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson BD, Helms TC, Olson MA (1991) Comparison of laboratory and field evaluations of resistance in soybean to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis 75:662–665Google Scholar
  28. Park SO, Coyne DP, Steadman JR, Skroch PW (2001) Mapping of QTL for resistance to white mold disease in common bean. Crop Sci 41:1253–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petzold R, Dickson H (1996) Straw test for resistance to white mold in beans. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 39:142–143Google Scholar
  30. SAS Institute (2004) The SAS system for windows. Version 9.1.3. SAS Inst., Cay, NCGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz HF, Casciano DH, Asenga JA, Wood DR (1987) Field measurement of white mold effects upon dry beans with genetic resistance or upright architecture. Crop Sci 27:699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz HF, Otto K, Terán H, Lema M, Singh SP (2006) Inheritance of white mold resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris x P. coccineus crosses. Plant Dis 90:1167–1170. doi:10.1094/PD-90-1167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh SP (1994) Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci 34:352–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh SP (2001) Broadening genetic base of common bean cultivars: a review. Crop Sci 41:1659–1675Google Scholar
  35. Singh SP, Gutiérrez JA (1984) Geographical distribution of DL 1 and DL 2 genes causing hybrid dwarfism in Phaseolus vulgaris L., their association with seed size, and their significance to breeding. Euphytica 33:337–345. doi:10.1007/BF00021130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh SP, Cardona C, Morales FJ, Pastor-Corrales MA, Voysest O (1998) Gamete selection for upright carioca bean with resistance to five diseases and leafhopper. Crop Sci 38:666–672Google Scholar
  37. Singh SP, Terán H, Muñoz CG, Takegami JC (2000) Registration of multiple-disease resistant carioca dry bean A 801 and A 804 germplasm. Crop Sci 40:1836–1837Google Scholar
  38. Singh SP, Terán H, Lema M, Schwartz HF, Miklas PN (2007) Registration of white mold resistant dry bean germplasm line A 195. J Plant Regist 1:62–63. doi:10.3198/jpr2006.10.0643crg CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh SP, Terán H, Lema M, Dennis MF, Hayes R, Robinson C (2008) Breeding for slow darkening, high-yielding, broadly adapted dry bean pinto ‘Kimberly’ and ‘Shoshone’. J Plant Regist 2:180–186. doi:10.3198/jpr2007.12.0708crc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steadman JR, Eskridge K, Costa J, Grafton K, Kelly J, Kmiecik K, Kolkman J, Myers J, Miklas P (2001) Evaluation of sources of resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in common bean with five test methods at multiple locations. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 44:89–90Google Scholar
  41. Terán H, Lema M, Schwartz HF, Duncan R, Gilbertson R, Singh SP (2006) Modified Petzoldt and Dickson scale for white mold rating of common bean. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 49:115–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Soil and Entomological Sciences Department, Kimberly Research & Extension CenterUniv. of IdahoKimberlyUSA

Personalised recommendations