Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies

Euphytica volume 171, pages 211–226 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Agronomic and fruit quality traits were evaluated and compared for three consecutive years on 1,111 seedlings coming from 15 peach and nectarine breeding crosses, grown under a Mediterranean climate. Significant differences among and within the different progenies were found for most of the traits analyzed. The breeding population segregated for several Mendelian characters such as peach or nectarine fruit, round or flat fruit, yellow or white flesh and freestone or clingstone. In addition, aborting fruit and flat fruit trees were found in our progeny, and our data seem to support multi-allelic control of both flat shape and aborting fruit. The variation within the progenies of some traits such as blooming and harvesting date, yield, fruit weight and SSC was continuous, suggesting a polygenic inheritance. Relationships between qualitative pomological traits and these agronomic and fruit quality parameters were also found. Valuable correlations among agronomic and fruit quality parameters were found, although coefficients of variation depending on the progeny should be considered. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) revealed several relationships among quality traits in the evaluated progenies. Based on this evaluation, 26 outstanding genotypes were pre-selected from the initial breeding population for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • AOAC (1984) Official methods of analysis. AOAC, Arlington, p 1141

  • Badenes ML, Martínez-Calvo J, Llácer G (1998) Analysis of apricot germplasm from the European ecogeographical group. Euphytica 102:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badenes ML, LLácer G, Crisosto CH (2006) Mejora de la Calidad de Frutales de Hueso. In: Llácer G, Díez MJ, Carrillo JM, Badenes ML (eds) Mejora genética de la calidad en plantas. Sociedad Española de Ciencias Hortícolas y Sociedad Española de Genética, Valencia, pp 551–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassi D, Selli R (1990) Evaluation of fruit quality in peach and apricot. Adv Hortic Sci 4:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SJ, Moore JN, Murphy JB (1993) Quantitative and qualitative changes in sugar content of peach genotypes [P. persica (L.) Batsch]. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:97–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brovelli EA, Brecht JK, Sherman WB, Sims CA, Harrison JM (1999) Sensory and compositional attributes of melting- and non-melting-flesh peaches for the fresh market. J Sci Food Agric 79:707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AG (1975) Apples. In: Jannick J, Moore JN (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DH (2002) Peach breeding trends. Acta Hortic 592:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DH (2003) Breeding peaches and nectarines for mild-winter climate areas: state of the art and future directions. In: Marra F, Sottile F (eds) Proceedings of the first Mediterranean peach symposium, Agrigento, Italy, pp 102–109

  • Byrne DH, Nikolic AN, Burns EE (1991) Variability in sugars, acids, firmness, and color characteristics of 12 peach genotypes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:1004–1006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cantín CM, Torrents J, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2006) Mejora y selección de nuevas variedades de melocotonero para condiciones del Valle Medio del Ebro. Actas Horticultura 45:209–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantín CM, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2009a) Analysis of phenotypic variation of sugar profile in different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. J Sci Food Agric 89:1909–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantín CM, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y (2009b) Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds and vitamin C content of different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. J Agric Food Chem 57:4586–4592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso T, Sottile F (1999) La peschicoltura autunnale in Sicilia: aspetti ambientali, varietali e colturali. Frutticoltura 2:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng ZP (2008) Classifying criteria for major fruit traits in Prunus persica and correlation analyses among the traits. J Am Pomol Soc 62:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors CH (1920) Some notes on the inheritance of unit characters in the peach. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 16:24–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM (2005) Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid melting flesh peach and nectarine [P. persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 38:239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Johnson RS, Day KR, DeJong T (1997) Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality. HortScience 32:820–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Day KR, Crisosto GM, Garner D (2001a) Quality attributes of white flesh peaches and nectarines grown under California conditions. J Am Pomol Soc 55:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Slaughter D, Garner D, Boyd J (2001b) Stone fruit critical bruising thresholds. J Am Pomol Soc 55:76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P (2003) Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Garner D, Crisosto GM, Bowerman E (2004) Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindll) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol Technol 34:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Echeverría G, Puy J (2006a) Segregation of peach and nectarine [P. persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics. Postharvest Biol Technol 39:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Neri F (2006b) Understanding tree fruit quality based on consumer acceptance. Acta Hortic 712:183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha LC, Durigan MFB, Mattiuz BH, Martins RN, Durigan JF (2007) Characterization of the maturation curve in ‘Aurora-1’ peaches in the region of Jaboticabal SP. Rev Bras Frutic 29:661–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlewanger E, Pronier V, Parvery C, Rothan C, Guye A, Monet R (1998) Genetic linkage map of peach [P. persica (L.) Batsch] using morphological and molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 97:888–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlewanger E, Moing A, Rothan C, Svanella L, Pronier V, Guye A, Plomion C, Monet R (1999) Mapping QTLs controlling fruit quality in peach [P. persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor Appl Genet 98:18–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlewanger E, Graziano E, Joobeur T, Garriga-Caldere F, Cosson P, Howad W, Arús P (2004) Comparative mapping and marker-assisted selection in Rosaceae fruit crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9891–9896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlewanger E, Cosson P, Boudehri K, Renaud C, Capdeville G, Tauzin Y, Laigret F, Moing A (2006) Development of a second-generation genetic linkage map for peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and characterization of morphological traits affecting flower and fruit. Tree Genet Genomes 3:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel KH, Ramming DW, Flath RA, Teranishi R (1988) Investigation of volatile constituents in nectarines. 2. Changes in aroma composition during nectarine maturation. J Agric Food Chem 36:1003–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esti M, Messia MC, Sinesio F, Nicotra A, Conte L, La Notte E, Palleschi G (1997) Quality evaluation of peaches and nectarines by electrochemical and multivariate analyses: relationships between analytical measurements and sensory attributes. Food Chem 60:659–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne C, Rothan C, Moing A, Plomion C, Bodénes C, Svanella-Dumas L, Cosson P, Pronier V, Monet R, Dirlewanger E (2002) Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar organic acid content in peach [P. persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor Appl Genet 105:145–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Essex, 464 pp

  • FAOSTAT (2007) http://www.faostat.fao.org

  • Fideghelli C, Della Strada G, Grassi F, Morico G (1998) The peach industry in the world: present situation and trend. Acta Hortic 465:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleckinger J (1945) Notations phénologiques et représentations graphiques du dévelopment des bourgeons de Poirier. Congrés de Paris de l’Association francaise pour l’avancement des Sciencies, Paris, p 118

  • Génard M, Bruchou C (1992) Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality. Sci Hortic 52:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Génard M, Souty M, Holmes S, Reich M, Breuils L (1994) Correlations among quality parameters of peach fruit. J Sci Food Agric 66:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Génard M, Reich M, Lobit P, Besset J (1999) Correlations between sugar and acid content and peach growth. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74:772–776

    Google Scholar 

  • George AP, Nissen RJ (1992) Effects of water stress, nitrogen and paclobutrazol on flowering, yield and fruit quality of the low-chill peach cultivar Flordaprince. Sci Hortic 49:197–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurrieri F, Audergon JM, Albagnac G, Reich M (2001) Soluble sugars and carboxylic acids in ripe apricot fruit as parameters for distinguishing different cultivars. Euphytica 117:183–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harker FR, Maindonald J, Murray SH, Gunson FA, Hallett IC, Walker SB (2002) Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 24:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilaire C (2003) The peach industry in France: state of art, research and development. In: Marra F, Sottile F (eds) First Mediterranean peach symposium, Agrigento, Italy, pp 27–34

  • Iglesias I, Echeverría G (2009) Differential effect of cultivar and harvest date on nectarine colour, quality and consumer acceptance. Sci Hortic 120:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LK, Sherman WB (1980) Peach and nectarine cultivars from the University of Florida breeding program 1950–90. Proc Trop Reg Am Soc Hortic Sci 24:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez S, Garín A, Albás ES, Betrán JA, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2004) Effect of several rootstocks on fruit quality of ‘Sunburst’ sweet cherry. Acta Hortic 658:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kader AA (1994) Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Perish Handl Newsl 80:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kader AA (2002) Postharvest biology and technology: an overview. In: Kader AA (ed) Postharvest technology of horticultural commodities. University of California Press, Davis, pp 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer A, Twigg BA (1966) Fundamentals of quality control for the food industry. Avi, Westport, p 512

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze OR, Aldred WH, Reeder BD (1975) Bruising characteristics of peaches related to mechanical harvesting. Trans ASAE 18:939–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavilla T, Recasens I, López ML, Puy J (2002) Multivariate analysis on maturity stages, including quality and aroma, in “Royal Glory” peaches and “Big Top” nectarines. J Sci Food Agric 82:1842–1849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lesley JW (1940) A genetic study of saucer fruit shape and other characters in the peach. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 37:218–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverani A, Giovannini D, Brandi F (2002) Increasing fruit quality of peaches and nectarines: the main goals of ISF-FO (Italy). Acta Hortic 592:507–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Bianco R, Rieger M (2006) Carbohydrate metabolism and sink strength in peach. HortScience 41:930

    Google Scholar 

  • López G, DeJong TM (2007) Spring temperatures have a major effect on early stages of peach fruit growth. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 82:507–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma R, Yu M, Du P, Guo H, Song H (2003) Evaluation of germplasm resources and breeding of flat peach. Acta Hortic 620:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh K, Attanayake S, Walker S, Gunson A, Boldingh H, MacRae E (2004) Acidity and taste in kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Calvo J, Llácer G, Cunill M, Duran S, Badenes ML (2006) Programa de mejora de melocotonero del IVIA. Actas Horticultura 45:221–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Monet R (1979) Transmission génétique du caractère ‘fruit doux’ chez le pêcher. Incidence sur la sélection pour la qualité. Eucarpia Section, Tree Fruit Breeding, INRA, Angers, pp 273–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno MA (2005) Selección de patrones y variedades de melocotonero. Vida Rural 206:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounzer OH, Conejero W, Nicolás E, Abrisqueta I, García-Orellana YV, Tapia LM, Vera J, Abrisqueta JM, Ruiz-Sánchez MC (2008) Growth pattern and phenological stages of early-maturing peach trees under a Mediterranean climate. HortScience 43:1813–1818

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz C, Sepulveda G, García-Huidolero J, Sherman WB (1986) Determining thermal time and base temperature required for fruit development in low-chilling peaches. HortScience 21:520–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson KE, Schutz HG, Ahmedull M, McPherso J (1973) Flavor preferences of supermarket customers for Thompson seedless grapes. Am J Enol Vitic 24:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra A, Conte L, Moser L, Fantechi P (2002) New types of high quality peaches: flat peaches (P. persica var. Platicarpa) and Ghiaccio peach series with long on tree fruit life. Acta Hortic 1–2:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogundiwin EA, Gradziel TM, Parfitt DE, Nicolet CM, Dhingra A, Lin D, Slaughter DC, Jasieniuk MA, Crisosto CH (2009) Towards SNP and QTL discovery of peach fruit quality genes. Plant and animal genome XVII conference, San Diego, p 431

  • Pangborn RM (1963) Relative taste intensities of selected sugars and organic acids. J Food Sci 28:726–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M (2004a) Shape, mass and dry matter content of peaches of varieties with different domestication levels. Sci Hortic 99:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quilot B, Wu BH, Kervella J, Genard M, Foulongne M, Moreau K (2004b) QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced backcross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana. Theor Appl Genet 109:884–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JA, Meredith FI, Russell RB, Scorza R (1989) Physical, chemical and sensory evaluation of high- and low-quality peaches. Acta Hortic 254:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JA, Horvat RJ, Lyon BG, Meredith FI, Senter SD, Okie WR (1990) Comparison of quality characteristics of selected yellow- and white-fleshed peach cultivars. J Food Sci 55:1308–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz D, Egea J (2008) Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm. Euphytica 163:143–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Pérez R, Ortega E, Duval H, Martínez-Gómez P, Dicenta F (2007) Inheritance and relationships of important agronomic traits in almond. Euphytica 155:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansavini S, Gamberini A, Bassi D (2006) Peach breeding, genetics and new cultivar trends. Acta Hortic 713:23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R, Sherman WB (1996) Peaches. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding. Tree and tropical fruits, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 325–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomás-Barberán FA, Gil MI, Cremin P, Waterhouse AL, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2001) HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches and plums. J Agric Food Chem 49:4748–4760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valero C, Crisosto CH, Slaughter D (2007) Relationship between nondestructive firmness measurements and commercially important ripening fruit stages for peaches, nectarines and plums. Postharvest Biol Technol 44:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas FJ, Romero MA (2001) Blooming time in almond progenies. Options Méditerranéennes 56:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wert TW, Williamson JG, Chaparro JX, Miller EP, Rouse RE (2007) The influence of climate on fruit shape of four low-chill peach cultivars. HortScience 42:1589–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M, Li S (2003) Analysis of genotypic variation of sugar and acid contents in peaches and nectarines through the principal component analysis. Euphytica 132:375–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu BH, Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J, Li SH (2005) Changes in sugar and organic acid concentrations during fruit maturation in peaches, P. davidiana and hybrids as analyzed by principal component analysis. Sci Hortic 103:429–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Shimada T, Imai T, Yaegaki H, Haji T, Matsuta N, Yamaguchi M, Hayashi T (2001) Characterization of morphological traits based on a genetic linkage map in peach. Breed Sci 51:271–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Aparicio, J. Torrents, M. Cunill, S. Durán, and M.P. Soteras for technical assistance and E. Igartua for critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Spanish MICINN (Ministry of Science and Innovation) grants AGL-2005-05533 and AGL-2008-00283, and the Regional Government of Aragón (A44). C.M. Cantín was supported by a FPU fellowship from Spanish MICINN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Pomología, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (CSIC), Apartado 13034, 50080, Zaragoza, Spain

    Celia M. Cantín, Yolanda Gogorcena & María Ángeles Moreno

Authors
  1. Celia M. Cantín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yolanda Gogorcena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Ángeles Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Ángeles Moreno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantín, C.M., Gogorcena, Y. & Moreno, M.Á. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Euphytica 171, 211–226 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0023-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0023-4

Keywords

search

Navigation