Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of genotype and environment on N uptake and N partition in organically grown winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Germany

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences among six winter wheat varieties regarding N efficiency (NE) and its components were assessed in field trials in four locations over 3 years under conditions of organic farming (OF). N uptake and utilization efficiency, redistribution of N vs. direct N uptake during grain filling, N uptake in three periods (tillering, stem elongation/heading and grain filling) and the quantity of mineralized N during the same sub-periods were determined. Significant differences for these traits and significant interactions among varieties and environments could be detected for NE and its components. Limiting N availability during grain filling was typical for the more extensive organic environments. Under these conditions, differences of NE could be attributed to differences in pre-anthesis uptake and in translocation from vegetative tissues to the developing grain. Pre-anthesis uptake contributed more to N efficiency than translocation efficiency. Under more favourable conditions, differences became more evident and were mainly due to direct uptake during grain filling. This confirms, that different varieties are necessary in different environments and that breeding may contribute to improve baking quality to a certain extent. However, utilization of mineralized N is still unsatisfactory in OF systems in Germany. More N efficient varieties alone will help only little to resolve this problem; this can be achieved only by also improving the cropping systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson A, Johansson E (2006) Nitrogen partitioning in entire plants of different spring wheat cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci 192:121–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annichiarico P (2002) Genotype  ×  environment interaction—Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbottin A, Lecomte C, Bouchard C, Jeuffroy MH (2005) Nitrogen remobilisation during grain filling in wheat: genotypic and environmental effects. Crop Sci 45:1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beevers L, Hageman R (1969) Nitrate reductase in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 20:491–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JH, Pedersen JF, Kingery RC (1990) Hereditability of root characteristics affecting mineral uptakeintensive in tall fescue, pages 93–96. In: El Bassam et al (eds) Genetic aspects of plant nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Eilrich GL, Hageman RH (1973) Nitrate reductase activity and its regulation to accumulation of vegetative and grain nitrogen in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Crop Sci 13:59–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1997) The state of the world s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome

  • Feil B, Thiraporn R, Geisler G, Stamp P (1990) Root traits of maize seedlings- indicators of nitrogen efficiency? Plant Soil 123:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey B, Schuepp H (1993) Acquisition of nitrogen by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Zea mays L. New Phytol (UK) 124(2):221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths B, Robinson D (1992) Root induced nitrogen mineralization: a nitrogen balance model. Plant Soil 139:253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heuberger JGK, Horst WJ (1995) Effect of root growth characteristics on nitrogen use efficiency of tropical maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. In: Jewell DC, Waddington SR, Ransom JK, Pixley KV (eds) Maize research for stress environments. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF (Mexico), pp 44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapulnik Y, Feldmann M, Okon Y, Henis Y (1985) Contribution of nitrogen fixed azospirillum to the nutrition of spring wheat in israel. Soil Biol Biochem 17:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapulnik Y, Feldmann M, Okon Y, Henis Y (1987) Yield response of spring wheat cultivars (triticum aestivum and t. turgidum) to inoculation with azospirillum brasiliense under field conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 4:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapulnik Y, Sarig S, Nur I, Okon Y (1983) Effect of azospirillum inoculation on yield of field-grown wheat. Can J Microbiol 29:895–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kichey T, Hirel B, Heumez E, Dubois F, Le Gouis J (2007) Wheat genetic variability for post-anthesis nitrogen absorption and remobilisation revealed by 15n labelling and correlations with agronomic traits and nitrogen physiological markers. Field Crops Res 102:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimashevsky EL (1990) Physiological basis of genotypic plant distinctions in mineral nutrition In: Bassam NEl, Dambroth M, Loughman BC (eds) Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 19–23

  • Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC, Jacobsen E (2002) Ecological aspects in organic farming and its consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Netherlands J Agric Sci 50:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gouis J, Pluchard P (1996) Genetic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 92:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loges R, Kaske A, Taube F (1999) Dinitrogen fixation and residue nitrogen of different managed legumes and nitrogen uptake of subsequent winter wheat. In: Beiträge zur 6. Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau. Köster Verlag, Berlin

  • Mäder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1982) Analyis and interpretatation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J 74:562–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1987) Development of nitrogen-efficient prolific hybrids of maize. Crop Sci 27:181–186

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Przulj N, Momcilovich V (2001a) Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley—ii. nitrogen translocation. Eur J Agron 15:241–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Przulj N, Momcilovich V (2001b) Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley i. dry matter translocation. Eur J Agron 15:255–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panga XP, Leteya J (2000) Challenge of timing nitrogen availability to crop nitrogen requirements. Soil Sci Soc of Am J 64:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Papakosta DK, Garianas AA (1991) Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilisation, and losses for mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agron J 83:864–870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe I (2000) Winterweizenbau in stickstofflimitierten Produktionssystemen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ertragsbildung, der Organischen Düngung und der mechanischen Beikrautregulierung. PhD thesis, Univ. Kiel (Germany)

  • Scheller E (1992) Felduntersuchungen zur Optimierung der Stickstoffversorgung der Pflanzen aus dem N-Stoffwechsel des Bodens. PhD thesis, Univ. Kassel (Germany)

  • Simpson RH, Lambers H, Dalling MJ (1983) Nitrogen redistribution during grain growth in wheat(triticum aestivum L) 4. Developement of a quantitative model of the translocation of nitrogen to the grain. Plant Physiol 71:7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stöppler H, Kolsch E, Vogtmann H (1991) Wurzelsystem, Biomasseproduktion, Bestockung und Ertragsbildung von vier Winterweizensorten in einem System mit geringer Betriebsmittelzufuhr von außen. J Agron Crop Sci 166:24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beem J (1997) Variation in nitrogen use efficiency and root system size in temperate maize genotypes. In: Edmeades GO, Banziger M, Mickelson HR, Pena-Valdivia CB (eds) Developing drought- and low N-tolerant maize. CIMMYT, Mexico DF (Mexico)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetselaar R, Farquhar GD (1980) Nitrogen losses from tops of plants. Adv Agron 33:263–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesler F, Horst WJ (1994) Root growth and nitrate utilization of maize cultivars under field conditions. Plant Soil 163:267–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Discussions within COST860 SUSVAR Network are acknowledged. The presentation of this work was sponsored by this COST860 SUSVAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Baresel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baresel, J.P., Zimmermann, G. & Reents, H.J. Effects of genotype and environment on N uptake and N partition in organically grown winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Germany. Euphytica 163, 347–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9718-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9718-1

Keywords

Navigation