Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Top ranking varieties are tested in multiple environments before and after registration in order to assess their value for cultivation and use (VCU testing). Recently, interest has increased in obtaining varieties specifically adapted to organic farming conditions. This raised the question if an independent system of trials may be required for this purpose. To help answering this question, through the exchange network of European cereal researchers SUSVAR (www.cost860.dk), a number of data sets of agronomic traits from barley, wheat and winter triticale, from trials performed in Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, France, Switzerland, UK and Germany, were made available and analysed using an approach based on mixed models involving parameters describing genetic correlation between the two types of experiments, i.e., organic and non-organic (high or low input). Estimated variance components and correlations were used to evaluate response to selection and index selection. The response to index selection was analysed as a function of the fraction of available trials assigned to the organic system. The genetic correlations were interpreted in terms of ranking agreement. We found high genetic correlations between both systems for most traits in all countries. Despite high genetic correlations, the chances of very good agreement in observed rankings were moderate. Combining information from both organic and non-organic systems is shown to be beneficial. Further, ignoring information from non-organic trials when making decisions regarding performance under organic conditions is a sub-optimal strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2007) Eurostat newsrelease 80/2007—12 June 2007. www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Last visited 16 November 2007

  • Bos I, Caligari P (2007) Selection methods in plant breeding, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger H, Scholen M, Schmidt W, Geiger HH (2008) Quantitative genetic studies on breeding maize for adaptation to organic farming. Euphytica. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9723-4

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen JL, McDonald GK, Shepherd KW, Lorimer MF, Graham DR (2003) Comparing wheat grown in South Australian organic and conventional farming systems. 1. Growth and grain yield. Aust J Agric Res 54:889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijer G, Schwärzel R (2006) Qualité boulangère du blé d’automne dans les essais d’homologation extenso et bio. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture 38:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy L, Osman A, Felix I, Oberforster M (2007) Setting up variety trials for organic and low input agriculture. In: Donner D, Osman A (eds) Handbook cereal variety testing for organic and low input agriculture. COST860-SUSVAR, Wageningen, Netherlands. GTS1-GTS8. http://www.cost860.dk/publications/handbook/

  • Mason H, Navabi A, Frick B, O’Donovan J, Niziol D, Spaner D (2007) Does growing Canadian Western Hard Red Spring wheat under organic management alter its breadmaking quality? Renew Agric Food Syst 22:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KM, Campbell KG, Lyon SR, Jones SS (2007) Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Res 102:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberforster M (2006) Ist die Sortenzulassungsprüfung biogerecht? Österreichische Fachtagung für biologische Landwirtschaft, 21–22, März 2006, pp 15–20

  • Osman AM, Lammerts van Bueren ET (2003) A participatory approach to designing and implementing organic ‘Value for Culivation and Use’ research. In: Lammerts van Bueren ET, Wilbois KP (eds) Organic seed production and plant breeding—strategies, problems and perspectives. Proceedings of ECO-PB 1st international symposium on organic seed production and plant breeding, Berlin, Germany, 21–22 November 2002, European Consortium for Organic Plant Breeding, Driebergen/Frankfurt, pp 46–49

  • Osman AM, van den Brink L, van den Broek RCFM, Lammerts van Bueren ET (2005) Passende Rassen. Rassenonderzoek voor Biologische Bedrijfssystemen. Zaaiuien & Zomertarwe. Louis Bolk Instituut en Praktijkonderzoek Plant & Omgeving, Driebergen

  • Padel S, Lampkin NH (1994) Farm level performance of organic farming systems: an overview. In: Lampkin NH, Padel S (eds) The economics of organic farming. An international perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 201–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho H-P, Möhring J (2005) Best linear unbiased prediction for subdivided target regions. Crop Sci 45:1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho H-P, Möhring J (2006) Selection in cultivar trials—is it ignorable? Crop Sci 146:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho H–P, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwärzel R, Levy L, Menzi M, Anders M, Winzeler H, Dörnte J (2006) Comparaison de deux réseaux d’essais variétaux de blé d’automne en cultures biologique et extensive. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture 38(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Casella G, Mc Culloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kristian Kristensen for creating environment for this collaborative work and for helpful comments on earlier versions of this data analysis. The work was partially supported by COST Action 860 “SUSVAR” within Working Groups “2. Biostatistics” and “6. Variety Testing and Certification”. The work of M. Przystalski and P. Krajewski was additionally supported by the grant SPB/COST/KN/DWM 74/2005–2008 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The Dutch research was a collaborative project of Louis Bolk Institute and PPO-AGV; we acknowledge Lubbert van den Brink of the latter institute for this collaboration. The winter triticale field trials were part of a research project funded by the Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung, Landwirtschaft (BMELV), Bundesprogramm Ökologischer Landbau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Przystalski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Przystalski, M., Osman, A., Thiemt, E.M. et al. Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries. Euphytica 163, 417–433 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9715-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9715-4

Keywords

Navigation