Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship between yield and mineral nutrient concentrations in historical and modern spring wheat cultivars

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diet of approximately three billion people worldwide is nutrient deficient and most of the world’s poorest people are dependent on staple food crops as their primary source of micronutrients. One component of the solution to nutrient deficiencies is collaboration among plant breeders, cereal chemists and nutritionists to produce staple crop cultivars with increased mineral nutrient concentration. Sixty-three historical and modern wheat cultivars were evaluated for grain yield and concentration of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, selenium, and zinc. While grain yield has increased over time, the concentrations of all minerals except calcium have decreased. Thus a greater consumption of whole wheat bread from modern cultivars is required to achieve the same percentage of recommended dietary allowance levels contributed by most of the older cultivars. The decrease in mineral concentration over the past 120 years occurs primarily in the soft white wheat market class, whereas in the hard red market class it has remained largely constant over time. This suggests that plant breeders, through intentional selection of low ash content in soft white wheat cultivars, have contributed to the decreased mineral nutrient concentration in modern wheat cultivars. These results contradict the theory that there exists a genetically based, biological trade-off between yield and mineral concentrations. Therefore, using the abundant variation present in wheat cultivars, it should be possible to improve mineral concentrations in modern cultivars without negatively affecting yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeledo LG, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (2003) Genetic improvement of barley yield potential and its physiological determinants in Argentina (1944–1998). Euphytica 130:325–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borlaug NE (1983) Contributions of conventional plant breeding to food production. Science 219:689–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouis HE (2003) Micronutrient fortification of plants through plant breeding: can it improve nutrition in man at low cost? Proc Nutr Soc 62:403–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branca F, Ferrari M (2002) Impact of micronutrient deficiencies on growth: the stunting syndrome. Ann Nutr Metab 46:8–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero B (2002) Global patterns of child health: the role of nutrition. Ann Nutr Metab 46:3–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calderini DF, Torresleon S, Slafer GA (1995) Consequences of wheat breeding on nitrogen and phosphorus yield, grain nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and associated traits. Ann Bot 76:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox CM, Qualset CO, Rains DW (1985) Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. 1. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci 25:430–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Epp MD, Riordan HD (2004) Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950–1999. J Am Coll Nutr 23:669–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DellaPenna D (1999) Nutritional genomics: manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health. Science 285:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egli I, Davidsson L, Juillerat MA, Barclay D, Hurrell R (2004) Phytic acid degradation in complementary foods using phytase naturally occurring in whole grain cereals. J Nutr 68:1855–1859

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox TE, Atherton C, Dainty JR, Lewis DJ, Langford NJ, Baxter MJ, Crews HM, Fairweather-Tait SJ (2005) Absorption of selenium from wheat, garlic, and cod intrinsically labeled with Se-77 and Se-82 stable isotopes. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 75:179–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frison EA, Smith IF, Johns T, Cherfas J, Eyzaguirre PB (2006) Agricultural biodiversity, nutrition, and health: making a difference to hunger and nutrition in the developing world. Food Nutr Bul 27:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin DF, Welch RM, Finley JW (2006) Historical shifts in the seed mineral micronutrient concentration of US hard red winter wheat germplasm. J Sci Food Agric 86:2213–2220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RD, Welch RM, Bouis HE (2001) Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods: principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Adv Agron 70:77–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham-McGregor SM, Ani CC (1999) The role of micronutrients in psychomotor sad cognitive development. Br Med Bull 55:511–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg L, Hulthen L (2000) Prediction of dietary iron absorption: an algorithm for calculating absorption and bioavailability of dietary iron. Am J Clin Nutr 71:1147–1160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heitholt JJ, Croy LI, Maness NO, Nguyen HT (1990) Nitrogen partitioning in genotypes of winter-wheat differing in grain N-concentration. Field Crops Res 23:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PE, Lykken GI, Korynta ED (1991) Absorption and biological half-life in humans of intrinsic and extrinsic 54Mn tracers from food of plant origin. J Nutr 121:711–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levrat-Verny MA, Coudray C, Bellanger J, Lopez HW, Demigne C, Rayssiguier Y, Remesy C (1999) Wholewheat flour ensures higher mineral absorption and bioavailability than white wheat flour in rats. Br J Nutr 82:17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe JF, Heiner RE (1975) Plant height, protein percentage, and yield relationships in spring wheat. Crop Sci 15:793–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan U, Manjrekar R, Rivera J, Gonzales-Cossio T, Martorell R (1999) Micronutrients and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature. Nutr Res 19:103–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z (2001) Genotypic differences in micronutrient use efficiency in crops. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:1163–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA, Swaminathan MS (2005) Cutting world hunger in half. Science 307:357–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slafer GA, Peltonen-Sainio P (2001) Yield trends of temperate cereals in high latitude countries from 1940 to 1998. Agric Food Sci Finland 10:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzfus RJ (2001) Defining iron-deficiency anemia in public health terms: a time for reflection. J Nutr 131:565S–567S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Fahima T, Blechl A, Dubcovsky J (2006) A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 314:1298–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2005) Washington wheat varieties. National agricultural statistics service http://www.nass.usda.gov/wa/whtvar05.pdf

  • Welch RM (2002) The impact of mineral nutrients in food crops on global human health. Plant Soil 247:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RM, Graham RD (1999) A new paradigm for world agriculture: meeting human needs productive, sustainable, nutritious. Field Crops Res 60:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RM, Graham RD (2002) Breeding crops for enhanced micronutrient content. Plant Soil 245:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weremko D, Fandrejewski H, Zebrowska T, Han IK, Kim JH, Cho WT (1997) Bioavailability of phosphorus in feeds of plant origin for pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 10:551–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White PJ, Broadley MR (2005) Historical variation in the mineral composition of edible horticultural products. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:660–667

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Margaret Smith, Dr. Preston Andrews, Dr. Salvatore Ceccarelli, Dr. Byung-kee Baik, Dr. Lu Ann Johnson, Dr. Gary Hareland, Dr. John Reganold, Dr. Kim Campbell, Dr. Tim Murray, David Granatstein, Julie Dawson and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. Unparalleled technical assistance was provided by Steve Lyon, Meg Gollnick and Kerry Balow. This work was funded by Washington State University’s Centre of Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, The Land Institute, the Organic Farming Research Foundation, the United States Department of Agriculture’s Integrated Organic Program (Grant Number: 2006–02057) and Washington Wheat Growers. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen S. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, K.M., Reeves, P.G. & Jones, S.S. Relationship between yield and mineral nutrient concentrations in historical and modern spring wheat cultivars . Euphytica 163, 381–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9681-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9681-x

Keywords

Navigation