Skip to main content

Marker-assisted selection efficiency in multiple connected populations: a simulation study based on the results of a QTL detection experiment in maize

Abstract

Many studies already investigated marker-assisted selection (MAS) efficiency but mainly in biparental populations. Connected multiparental populations address a broader diversity and confer a gain of power for QTL detection which must be beneficial for MAS. Our objective was to compare multiparental connected designs to biparental populations taken separately for MAS and phenotypic selection. We first detected QTL for flowering time and grain yield in an experimental maize design involving four parental inbred lines crossed to produce six different biparental populations and confirmed the advantage of multiparental connected designs over biparental populations for QTL detection. Based on these results we performed stochastic simulations to evaluate the expected efficiency of four generations of MAS and phenotypic selection. Different parameters were considered: trait heritability, genetic architecture and whether QTL were assumed to be known or have to be detected. Genetic gains were higher in the multiparental design than on average over the biparental populations considered separately, especially when favourable alleles were equally distributed among parental lines. When QTL detection was included in the simulation process, we found that type I error risk considered for declaring QTL as significant should be adapted to the design. Type I error risks leading to the best response were higher for the biparental populations than for the multiparental design. Besides addressing a broader diversity, multiparental designs increase the power of QTL detection, which reinforces their superiority over biparental designs for MAS. Application of MAS to multiparental designs therefore appears promising to accelerate genetic gain in plant breeding programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Abbreviations

MAS:

Marker-assisted selection

QTL:

Quantitative trait loci

References

  • Bernardo R (2004) What proportion of declared QTL in plants are false? Theor Appl Genet 109:419–424

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R, Moreau L, Charcosset A (2006) Optimizing the number and fitness of selected individuals in recurrent selection. Crop Sci 46:1972–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc G, Charcosset A, Mangin B et al (2006) Connected populations for detecting QTL and testing for epistasis, an application in maize. Theor Appl Genet 113:206–224

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset A, Mangin B, Combes L et al (2000) Heterosis in maize investigated using connected RIL populations, pp. in quantitative genetics and breeding methods: the way ahead. INRA, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmet G, Robert N, Perretant MR et al (1999) Marker-assisted recurrent selection for cumulating additive and interactive QTLs in recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 99:1143–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers JC, Chakraborty R, Moreau L (2002) Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage. Genet Sel Evol 34:171–192

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gimelfarb A, Lande R (1994) Simulation of marker-assisted selection in hybrid populations. Genet Res 63:39–47

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimelfarb A, Lande R (1995) Marker-assisted selection and marker-QTL association in hybrid populations. Theor Appl Genet 91:522–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1919) The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J Genetics 8:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley CS, Knott SA (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69:315–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Goldringer I, Openshaw S (2000) Efficient marker-based recurrent selection for multiple quantitative trait loci. Genet Res 75:357–368

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Moreau L, Lacoudre F et al (1997) More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 95:1181–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannink JL, Jansen RC (2001) Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics 157:445–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jourjon MF, Jasson S, Marcel J et al (2005) MCQTL: multi-allelic QTL mapping in multi-cross design. Bioinformatics 21:128–130

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp SJ, Stroup WW, Ross WM (1985) Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci 25:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J et al (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau L, Charcosset A, Hospital F et al (1998) Marker-assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size. Genetics 148:1353–1365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau L, Charcosset A, Gallais A (2004) Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize. Euphytica 137:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Frascaroli E (1997) QTL detection and marker-assisted selection for complex traits in maize. In: Proc. 52th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference., ed by ASTA, Washington DC

  • Rebai A, Goffinet B (1993) Power of tests for QTL detection using replicated progenies derived from a diallel cross. Theor Appl Genet 86:1014–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebai A, Goffinet B (2000) More about quantitative trait locus mapping with diallel designs. Genet Res 75:243–247

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berloo R, Stam P (1998) Marker-assisted selection in autogamous RIL populations : a simulation study. Theor Appl Genet 96:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Smith C (1992) Computer simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium. Theor Appl Genet 83:813–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Smith C (1993) Simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium: the effect of several additional factors. Theor Appl Genet 86:492–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Moreau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanc, G., Charcosset, A., Veyrieras, JB. et al. Marker-assisted selection efficiency in multiple connected populations: a simulation study based on the results of a QTL detection experiment in maize. Euphytica 161, 71–84 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9607-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9607-z

Keywords

  • Marker-assisted selection
  • QTL
  • Multiparental designs
  • Maize