Skip to main content
Log in

Responses to selection and changes in combining ability after three cycles of a modified reciprocal recurrent selection in maize

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research reports responses to selection and changes in general (GCA) and specific (SCA) combining abilities after three cycles of a modified reciprocal recurrent selection procedure (MRRS) in EPB-4 and EPB-5 maize populations. In the MRRS procedure a cycle can be completed in 1 or 2 years depending on the availability of winter breeding nurseries. The original and the three selection cycles of the two populations per se (eight entries) and the partial diallel developed from the crosses between them (16 entries) were evaluated in six environments. Realized response to selection on the population cross was 7.25% cycle−1 for grain yield, −13.63% cycle−1 for plant lodging, and 11.93% cyle−1 for prolificacy, whereas plant and ear heights remained unchanged. GCA estimates increased with selection cycles for both populations for grain yield and prolificacy, and decreased for plant lodging, indicating that the frequency of favorable alleles with additive effects for these traits increased with the MRRS cycles in both populations. SCA estimates increased for grain yield and prolificacy indicating that the frequency of favorable complementary alleles at loci with non-additive effects in the reciprocal populations increased with the MRRS cycles. For grain yield, SCA effects increased more than GCA effects with selection cycles, indicating that MRRS exploited more the non-additive effects than the additive effects for the improvement of this trait. The overall results showed that the MRRS procedure was highly effective in improving the population cross, exploiting both GCA and SCA effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MRRS:

Modified reciprocal recurrent selection

GCA:

General combining ability

SCA:

Specific combining ability

References

  • Bernardo R (1996) Testcross selection prior to further inbreeding in maize: mean performance and realized genetic variance. Crop Sci 36:867–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betrán FJ, Hallauer AR (1996) Hybrid improvement after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Maydica 41:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham ET (1998). Role of chromosome blocks in heterosis and estimates of dominance and overdominance. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. Am Soc Crop Sci, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock RE, Robinson HF, Harvey PH (1949) A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. J Am Soc Agron 41:360–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerksen TK, Kannenberg LW, Lee EA (2003) Effect of recurrent selection on combining ability in maize breeding populations. Crop Sci 43:1652–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyherabide GH, Hallauer AR (1991) Reciprocal full-sib recurrent selection: I Direct and correlated responses. Crop Sci 31:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garay G, Igartua E, Alvarez A (1996) Combining ability associated with S1 recurrent selection in two maize synthetics. Maydica 41:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi IO, Miranda Fo. JB (1988) Adapted models for the analysis of combining ability of varieties in partial diallel crosses. Brazil J Genetics 11:419–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda Fo JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. 2nd ed, Iowa State University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement. Am Soc Agron, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeratinijakal V, Lamkey KR (1993) Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci 33:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Stuber CW (1977) Frequency distribution of maize yield before and after reciprocal recurrent selection. Crop Sci 17:794–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motto M, Moll RH (1983) Proficacy in maize: a review. Maydica 28:53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher MAM, Hallauer AR, Russell WA (1999) Comparative response of two reciprocal recurrent selection methods in BS21 and BS22 maize populations. Crop Sci 39:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezende GSP, Souza Jr CL (2000) A reciprocal recurrent selection procedure outlined to integrate hybrid breeding programs in maize. J Genetics Breed 54:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell WA (1985) Comparison of hybrid performance of maize lines developed from the original and improved cycles of BSSS. Maydica 30:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS® Proprietary Software, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva AR, Souza Jr CL, Aguiar AM, Souza AP (2004) Estimates of genetic variance and level of dominance in a tropical maize population I Grain yield and plant traits. Maydica 49:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JCS (1988) Diversity of United States hybrid maize germplasm: isozymic and chromatographic evidence. Crop Sci 28:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza Jr CL (1987) Reciprocal recurrent selection with half-sib progenies obtained alternately from noninbred (S0) and inbred (S1) plants in maize. Maydica 32:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Jr CL (1999) Recurrent selection and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Am Soc Agron, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Jr CL, Pinto RMC (2000) Responses to a short-term reciprocal recurrent selection procedure in maize. Maydica 45:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague GF (1984) Organization of breeding programs. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annu Illinois Corn Breeders School Univ of Illinois, USA

  • Vencovsky R, Barriga P (1992) Genética biométrica no fitomelhoramento. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Bernardo R (2004) Changes in genetic variance during advanced cycle breeding in maize. Crop Sci 44:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Departamento de Genética-ESALQ/USP, and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/PROEX). C. L. Souza Jr. is recipient of a research fellowship from CNPq. M. F. Santos, T. M. M. Câmara, and G. V. Moro received fellowships from CNPq. The authors express their gratitude to A. S. Oliveira, C. R. Segatelli, and A. Silva, for their assistance with field experiments at Piracicaba, and to Dr. V. Naspolini for conducting the trials at Santa Cruz das Palmeiras. Thanks are also due to two anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cláudio Lopes De Souza Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santos, M.F., Câmara, T.M.M., Moro, G.V. et al. Responses to selection and changes in combining ability after three cycles of a modified reciprocal recurrent selection in maize. Euphytica 157, 185–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9410-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9410-x

Keywords