Skip to main content

Village seed systems and the biological diversity of millet crops in marginal environments of India

Abstract

The study relates village seed systems to biological diversity of millet crops grown by farmers in the semi-arid lands of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, India. In these subsistence-oriented, semi-arid production systems the environment is marginal for crop growth and often there is no substitute for millet crops. Across communities, farmers grow 13 different combinations of pearl millet, sorghum, finger millet, little millet, and foxtail millet varieties, but individual farmers grow an average of only 2–3 millet varieties per season. The “village seed system” in this study refers to all channels through which farmers acquire genetic materials, separate from or in interaction with the commercial seed industry, observed at the local level. Data are compiled through household surveys and interviews with traders and dealers in village and district markets. Based on the concept of the seed lot, several seed system parameters are defined and measured by millet crop. Most seed transactions, including gifts of seed, appear to be monetized. Seed supply channels differ by improvement status of the genetic material. Regression results confirm that seed system parameters are statistically significant determinants of the spatial diversity of millet crops measured at the village level. Furthermore, both the trade through weekly village markets (shandies) and through the formal seed supply channel contribute positively to the breadth of genetic materials in these communities. Ways should be found to strengthen and improve the overall efficiency of the seed system, including both formal and informal channels, in order to reduce the costs to farmers of procuring and managing diverse crop varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Personal communication with Dr. A. Seetharam, November 2002, Professor (Emeritus), ICAR Center for Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore; Mr. Gopal Reddy, Scientists, ICRISAT Gene Bank and Prof. Naik, Millet Breeder, UAS Dharwad; Rabi Sorghum Germplasm Collection in Northern Karnataka and Adjoining areas of Andhra Pradesh, Genetic Resources Progress Report—74 and 85, ICRISAT; Rainy Sorghum Germplasm Collections in Karnataka and Adjoining Areas, Genetic Resources Progress Report—29, ICRISAT.

  2. 2.

    Personal communication with Dr. A. Seetharam, January 2003, Professor (Emeritus), ICAR Center for Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.

  3. 3.

    Calculated with triangular yield distributions elicited from farmers, by variety (Hardaker, Huirne and Anderson 1997).

References

  1. Aguirre Gomez JA (1999) Análisis regional de la diversidad del maíz en el sureste de guanajuato. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Mexico, D.F

  2. Almekinders CJM, Louwaars NP, de Bruijn GH (1994) Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apple JL (1977) The theory of disease management. In: Horsfal JG (ed) Plant disease: an advanced treatise. Academic Press, New York, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berthaud J, Pressoir G, Ramirez F, Bellon MR (2002) Farmers’ management of maize landrace diversity. A case study in Oaxaca and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on the biosafety of genetically modified organisms, Beijing, October 10–16, pp 79–88

  5. Brennan JP, Byerlee D (1991) The rate of crop varietal replacement on farms: measures and empirical results for wheat. Plant Varieties Seeds 4:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brock AW, Xepapadeas A (2003) Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach. Am Econ Rev 93(No. 5), December 2003

  7. Cromwell E, Wiggins S, Wentzel S (1993) Sowing beyond the state: NGOs and seed supply in developing countries. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. David S, Sperling L (1999) Improving technology delivery mechanisms: lessons from bean seed systems research in Eastern and Central Africa. Agricult Human Values 16(4):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gopal Reddy V, Sharma VD (1996) Rabi Sorghum germplasm collection in Maharashtra and adjoining areas of Karnataka. Genetic resources progress report-85. A joint collection mission by ICRISAT Asia center and NBPGR (ICAR), January–February (1996). ICRISAT, Patancheru, India

  10. Gopal Reddy V, Mathur PN, Prasada Rao KE, Mengesha MH (1993) Rabi Sorghum germplasm collection in Northern Karnataka and adjoining areas of Andhra Pradesh. Genetic resources report—74. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India

  11. Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) Coping with risk in agriculture. CAB International, Oxon, United Kingdom. ISBN 0 85199 199 X

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heisey PW, Brennan JP (1991) An analytical model of farmers’ demand for replacement seed. Am J Agricult Econ 73(4):1044–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heisey PW, Morris M, Byerlee D, Lopez-Pereira M (1998) Economics of hybrid maize adoption. In: Morris ML (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Yu S (1996) Traditional maintenance and multiplication of foxtail millet. Euphytica 87:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Louette D (1994) Gestion traditionnelle de variétés de mais dans la réserve de la Biosphère de Mananatlan (RBSM, états de Jalisco et Colima, Mexique) et conservation in située des ressources génétiques de plantes cultivées. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

  16. Louette D, Smale M (2000) Farmers’ seed selection practices and maize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Euphytica 113:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magurran A (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maredia M, Howard J, Boughton D, Naseem A, Wanyala M, Kajisa K (1999) Increasing seed system efficiency in Africa: concepts, strategies and issues. MSU international development working paper no. 77. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

  19. Morris ML, Rusike J, Smale M (1998) Maize seed industries: a conceptual framework. In: Morris M (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner and CIMMYT, Boulder and Mexico, D.F

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagarajan L (2004) Managing millet diversity: farmers’ choices, seed systems and genetic resource policy in India. PhD dissertation, Department of Applied and Agricultural Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA. December 2004

  21. Prasada Rao KE, Gopal Reddy V (1980) Kharif Sorghum germplasm collection in Karnataka and adjoining areas. Genetic resources progress report 29. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Ref ID:296

  22. Smale M (ed) (2006) Valuing crop biodiversity: on-farm genetic resources and economic change. CABI, Wallingford, UK

  23. Sperling L (2002) Emergency seed aid in Kenya: some case study insights on lessons learned during the 1990s. Disasters 26(4):329–342

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sperling L, Loevinsohn ME (1993) The dynamics of adoption: distribution and mortality of bean varieties among small farmers in Rwanda. Agricult Syst 41(4):441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sperling L, Scheidegger U, Buruchara R (1996) Designing seed systems with small farmers: principles derived from bean research in the great lakes region of Africa. Agricultural research and extension network paper no. 60. Overseas Development Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thiele G (1999) Informal potato seed systems in the Andes: why are they important and what should we do with them? World Devel 27(1):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tripp R (1997) New seed and old laws: regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tripp R (2001) Seed provisions and agricultural development: the institutions of rural change. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Dusen E, Taylor JE (2005) Missing markets and crop diversity: evidence from Mexico. Environ Develop Econ 10(4):513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. vom Brocke K (2001) Effects of farmers’ seed management on performance, adaptation, and genetic diversity of pearl millet (Pennisettum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) populations in Rajasthan, India. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim, Germany

  31. Zimmerer KS (2003) Geographies of seed networks for food plants (potato, Ulluco) and approaches to agrobiodiversity conservation in the Andean countries. Soc Nat Resour 16(3):583–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of anonymous reviewers, as well as Amanda King, Eric Van Dusen,Leslie Lipper,Phil Pardey, Rob Tripp, and Svetlana Edmeades, on earlier drafts of this paper. The European Union, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) supported this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Latha Nagarajan.

Appendix

Appendix

Annex. 1 Glossary of terms

Ancestral cultivar Farmer cultivar for which farming communities or individual farmers have saved seed for generations
Farmer cultivar Variety bred/selected by farmers
Formal seed supply channel A channel that transmits planting material developed by professional plant breeders, e.g. private firms
FC Farmer cultivar
HYB Hybrid
Improved variety Variety improved by professional plant breeders
Informal seed supply channel A channel that transmits planting material developed by farmers or previously developed, saved, and transferred by farmers. Typically, although not always, involves non-market transactions. One counterexample is a shandy
IOPV Improved open-pollinated variety
IPLS Improved pureline selection, from a farmer cultivar
Kharif the cool, rainy season, (mid-July to the end of October)
Panchayat literally, a “village community,” or cluster of villages; an administrative designation
Rabi The post-rainy season (December to March)
Seed lot Physical unit of seed the farmer uses to reproduce a variety
Seed replacement rate No. of times a farmer has replaced the seed lot of a given variety, procured from either formal or informal sources, divided by the years of use
Seed-to-grain price ratio Ratio of seed price to grain price for crop variety
Shandy A weekly village market
Variety age No. of years farmer has grown the same named variety

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagarajan, L., Smale, M. Village seed systems and the biological diversity of millet crops in marginal environments of India. Euphytica 155, 167–182 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9319-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Millet diversity
  • Seed systems
  • Variety change
  • Dry lands