The study relates village seed systems to biological diversity of millet crops grown by farmers in the semi-arid lands of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, India. In these subsistence-oriented, semi-arid production systems the environment is marginal for crop growth and often there is no substitute for millet crops. Across communities, farmers grow 13 different combinations of pearl millet, sorghum, finger millet, little millet, and foxtail millet varieties, but individual farmers grow an average of only 2–3 millet varieties per season. The “village seed system” in this study refers to all channels through which farmers acquire genetic materials, separate from or in interaction with the commercial seed industry, observed at the local level. Data are compiled through household surveys and interviews with traders and dealers in village and district markets. Based on the concept of the seed lot, several seed system parameters are defined and measured by millet crop. Most seed transactions, including gifts of seed, appear to be monetized. Seed supply channels differ by improvement status of the genetic material. Regression results confirm that seed system parameters are statistically significant determinants of the spatial diversity of millet crops measured at the village level. Furthermore, both the trade through weekly village markets (shandies) and through the formal seed supply channel contribute positively to the breadth of genetic materials in these communities. Ways should be found to strengthen and improve the overall efficiency of the seed system, including both formal and informal channels, in order to reduce the costs to farmers of procuring and managing diverse crop varieties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Personal communication with Dr. A. Seetharam, November 2002, Professor (Emeritus), ICAR Center for Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore; Mr. Gopal Reddy, Scientists, ICRISAT Gene Bank and Prof. Naik, Millet Breeder, UAS Dharwad; Rabi Sorghum Germplasm Collection in Northern Karnataka and Adjoining areas of Andhra Pradesh, Genetic Resources Progress Report—74 and 85, ICRISAT; Rainy Sorghum Germplasm Collections in Karnataka and Adjoining Areas, Genetic Resources Progress Report—29, ICRISAT.
Personal communication with Dr. A. Seetharam, January 2003, Professor (Emeritus), ICAR Center for Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
Calculated with triangular yield distributions elicited from farmers, by variety (Hardaker, Huirne and Anderson 1997).
Aguirre Gomez JA (1999) Análisis regional de la diversidad del maíz en el sureste de guanajuato. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Mexico, D.F
Almekinders CJM, Louwaars NP, de Bruijn GH (1994) Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78:207–216
Apple JL (1977) The theory of disease management. In: Horsfal JG (ed) Plant disease: an advanced treatise. Academic Press, New York, N.Y
Berthaud J, Pressoir G, Ramirez F, Bellon MR (2002) Farmers’ management of maize landrace diversity. A case study in Oaxaca and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on the biosafety of genetically modified organisms, Beijing, October 10–16, pp 79–88
Brennan JP, Byerlee D (1991) The rate of crop varietal replacement on farms: measures and empirical results for wheat. Plant Varieties Seeds 4:99–106
Brock AW, Xepapadeas A (2003) Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach. Am Econ Rev 93(No. 5), December 2003
Cromwell E, Wiggins S, Wentzel S (1993) Sowing beyond the state: NGOs and seed supply in developing countries. Overseas Development Institute, London
David S, Sperling L (1999) Improving technology delivery mechanisms: lessons from bean seed systems research in Eastern and Central Africa. Agricult Human Values 16(4):381–388
Gopal Reddy V, Sharma VD (1996) Rabi Sorghum germplasm collection in Maharashtra and adjoining areas of Karnataka. Genetic resources progress report-85. A joint collection mission by ICRISAT Asia center and NBPGR (ICAR), January–February (1996). ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Gopal Reddy V, Mathur PN, Prasada Rao KE, Mengesha MH (1993) Rabi Sorghum germplasm collection in Northern Karnataka and adjoining areas of Andhra Pradesh. Genetic resources report—74. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) Coping with risk in agriculture. CAB International, Oxon, United Kingdom. ISBN 0 85199 199 X
Heisey PW, Brennan JP (1991) An analytical model of farmers’ demand for replacement seed. Am J Agricult Econ 73(4):1044–1052
Heisey PW, Morris M, Byerlee D, Lopez-Pereira M (1998) Economics of hybrid maize adoption. In: Morris ML (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colorado
Li Y, Yu S (1996) Traditional maintenance and multiplication of foxtail millet. Euphytica 87:38–48
Louette D (1994) Gestion traditionnelle de variétés de mais dans la réserve de la Biosphère de Mananatlan (RBSM, états de Jalisco et Colima, Mexique) et conservation in située des ressources génétiques de plantes cultivées. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Louette D, Smale M (2000) Farmers’ seed selection practices and maize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Euphytica 113:25–41
Magurran A (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA
Maredia M, Howard J, Boughton D, Naseem A, Wanyala M, Kajisa K (1999) Increasing seed system efficiency in Africa: concepts, strategies and issues. MSU international development working paper no. 77. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
Morris ML, Rusike J, Smale M (1998) Maize seed industries: a conceptual framework. In: Morris M (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner and CIMMYT, Boulder and Mexico, D.F
Nagarajan L (2004) Managing millet diversity: farmers’ choices, seed systems and genetic resource policy in India. PhD dissertation, Department of Applied and Agricultural Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA. December 2004
Prasada Rao KE, Gopal Reddy V (1980) Kharif Sorghum germplasm collection in Karnataka and adjoining areas. Genetic resources progress report 29. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Ref ID:296
Smale M (ed) (2006) Valuing crop biodiversity: on-farm genetic resources and economic change. CABI, Wallingford, UK
Sperling L (2002) Emergency seed aid in Kenya: some case study insights on lessons learned during the 1990s. Disasters 26(4):329–342
Sperling L, Loevinsohn ME (1993) The dynamics of adoption: distribution and mortality of bean varieties among small farmers in Rwanda. Agricult Syst 41(4):441–453
Sperling L, Scheidegger U, Buruchara R (1996) Designing seed systems with small farmers: principles derived from bean research in the great lakes region of Africa. Agricultural research and extension network paper no. 60. Overseas Development Agency, London
Thiele G (1999) Informal potato seed systems in the Andes: why are they important and what should we do with them? World Devel 27(1):83–99
Tripp R (1997) New seed and old laws: regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems. Intermediate Technology Publications, London
Tripp R (2001) Seed provisions and agricultural development: the institutions of rural change. Overseas Development Institute, London
Van Dusen E, Taylor JE (2005) Missing markets and crop diversity: evidence from Mexico. Environ Develop Econ 10(4):513–531
vom Brocke K (2001) Effects of farmers’ seed management on performance, adaptation, and genetic diversity of pearl millet (Pennisettum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) populations in Rajasthan, India. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim, Germany
Zimmerer KS (2003) Geographies of seed networks for food plants (potato, Ulluco) and approaches to agrobiodiversity conservation in the Andean countries. Soc Nat Resour 16(3):583–601
The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of anonymous reviewers, as well as Amanda King, Eric Van Dusen,Leslie Lipper,Phil Pardey, Rob Tripp, and Svetlana Edmeades, on earlier drafts of this paper. The European Union, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) supported this research.
Annex. 1 Glossary of terms
|Ancestral cultivar||Farmer cultivar for which farming communities or individual farmers have saved seed for generations|
|Farmer cultivar||Variety bred/selected by farmers|
|Formal seed supply channel||A channel that transmits planting material developed by professional plant breeders, e.g. private firms|
|Improved variety||Variety improved by professional plant breeders|
|Informal seed supply channel||A channel that transmits planting material developed by farmers or previously developed, saved, and transferred by farmers. Typically, although not always, involves non-market transactions. One counterexample is a shandy|
|IOPV||Improved open-pollinated variety|
|IPLS||Improved pureline selection, from a farmer cultivar|
|Kharif||the cool, rainy season, (mid-July to the end of October)|
|Panchayat||literally, a “village community,” or cluster of villages; an administrative designation|
|Rabi||The post-rainy season (December to March)|
|Seed lot||Physical unit of seed the farmer uses to reproduce a variety|
|Seed replacement rate||No. of times a farmer has replaced the seed lot of a given variety, procured from either formal or informal sources, divided by the years of use|
|Seed-to-grain price ratio||Ratio of seed price to grain price for crop variety|
|Shandy||A weekly village market|
|Variety age||No. of years farmer has grown the same named variety|
About this article
Cite this article
Nagarajan, L., Smale, M. Village seed systems and the biological diversity of millet crops in marginal environments of India. Euphytica 155, 167–182 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9319-9
- Millet diversity
- Seed systems
- Variety change
- Dry lands