Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 154, Issue 1–2, pp 139–144 | Cite as

An alternative protocol for isolating the flanking sequences of a mutation

  • Chunyu Li
  • Huijun Zhao
  • Benguo Liang
  • Tao WangEmail author
  • Guangchen Li
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Although spontaneous mutations are of fundamental importance to all aspects of organismal biology, it remains difficult to locate the site of the mutation once a useful mutant has been recovered. Using a site-directed mutation in the promoter of chlorophyll a/b binding protein as a model, we have developed a procedure to tag the mutation site to allow its isolation. In a demonstration of this approach, S1 nuclease mismatch cleavage of the deletion site was used as a model to create a DNA break at the deletion, which was subsequently tagged with a one-nucleotide A-tailing reaction. Ligation-mediated PCR with biotinylated primers allowed the capture of a tagged DNA fragment, leading to the recovery of the flanking sequence of the site of the mutation. The specificity and sensitivity in the real situation were tested by using total genomic DNA of apple variety Wijicik McIntosh as background and titering the mutant site flanking sequence using different amounts of mutant DNA and wild-type DNA. The results showed that the protocol could screen the mutant site in whole genomic DNA in 1 week, but unspecific digestion due to the cross-hybridization between imperfectly matched fragments occurred, and the very low-copy mutation has also yet to be resolved.

Keywords

Mutation detection Genomic DNA S1 nuclease Spontaneous mutations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No: 39970526). The authors also wish to thank colleagues in the State Key Laboratories for AgroBiotechnology for their advice and support, especially Master Li-Bing Liu who provided the promoter.

References

  1. Ahmadian A, Lundeberg J (2002) A brief history of genetic variation analysis. BioTechniques 32:1122–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arondel V, Lemieux B, Hwang I, Gibson S, Goodman HM, Somerville CR (1992) Map-based cloning of a gene controlling Omega-3 fatty acid desaturation in Arabidopsis. Science 258:1353–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Foster GD, Twell D (eds) (1996) Plant gene isolation: principles and practice John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Hames BD, Higgins SJ (eds) (1985) Nucleic acid hybridization. A practical approach. IRL Press/Oxford, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Howard JT, Ward J, Watson JN, Roux KH (1999) Heteroduplex cleavage analysis using S1 nuclease. BioTechniques 27:18–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Oleykowski CA, Bronson-Mullins CR, Godwin AK, Yeung AT (1998) Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 26:4597–4602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shenk TE, Rhodes C, Rigby PWJ, Berg P (1975) Biochemical method for mapping mutational alterations in DNA with S1 nuclease: the location of deletions and temperature-sensitive mutations in simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:989–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Silber JR, Loeb LA (1981) S1 nuclease does not cleave DNA at single-base mismatches. Biochim Biophys Acta 656:256–264PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunyu Li
    • 1
  • Huijun Zhao
    • 2
  • Benguo Liang
    • 3
  • Tao Wang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Guangchen Li
    • 3
  1. 1.The College of Agricultural and BiotechnologyThe Institution of Entomology, Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouP. R. China
  2. 2.The College of BiologyThe State Key Laboratories for AgroBiotechnology, China Agricultural UniversityBeijingP. R. China
  3. 3.The College of Agricultural and BiotechnologyChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingP. R. China

Personalised recommendations