, Volume 154, Issue 1–2, pp 91–99 | Cite as

Characterization of resistance to Aphis glycines in soybean accessions

  • Louis S. HeslerEmail author
  • Kenton E. Dashiell
  • Jonathan G. Lundgren


The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, is a pest of soybean [Glycine max L. (Merrill)] in Asia, and its recent establishment in North America has led to large, recurring outbreaks that have challenged pest management practitioners there to seek environmentally responsible means for its control. Growth-chamber experiments were conducted to determine and characterize host-plant resistance among several soybean accessions. Soybean plants were first screened for resistance by rating the population growth of A. glycines in two tests. All plants of PI 230977 and 25% of PI 71506 plants were resistant (≤100 aphids per plant) in the first screening test. All ‘Dowling’, PI 71506 and PI 230977 were resistant (≤150 aphids per plant), and 50% of plants of line ‘G93-9223’ were resistant in the second test. Follow-up experiments showed that antixenosis was a modality of resistance based on reduced nymphiposition by A. glycines on Dowling, PI 230977 and PI 71506 in no-choice tests and on fewer numbers of A. glycines on Dowling, PI 230977, PI 71506 and G93-5223 in distribution tests. Antixenosis in Dowling and PI 230977 was stronger in the unifoliolate leaves than in other shoot structures, whereas distribution of A. glycines within plants of PI 71506 and G93-5223 suggested comparable suitability between unifoliolate leaves and other shoot structures of these accessions. Antibiosis to A. glycines was evident as a lower proportion of aphids that reproduced on PI 230977 and from fewer progeny on PI 230977 and Dowling than on 91B91. The number of days from birth to reproduction by A. glycines did not differ among accessions. Results confirmed Dowling and PI 71506 as strong sources of resistance to A. glycines. The levels of antixenosis and antibiosis to A. glycines in PI 230977 and antixenosis to A. glycines in G93-9223 suggest that these accessions may also be valuable to soybean breeding programs as sources of resistance.


Antibiosis Antixenosis Aphis glycines Host-plant resistance PI 230977 



Eric Beckendorf, David Mills, Joshua Pedro, and Ryan Rubbelke provided technical assistance. Paul Evenson, Mark West, and Michael Lehman provided advice regarding statistical analyses. The National Soybean Collection, USDA-ARS, and Michael Catangui, South Dakota State University, supplied seed of some soybean accessions. Kelley Tilmon, Roy Scott, Eric Beckendorf, and Lauren Hesler graciously reviewed drafts of this paper. The article reports the results of research only. Mention of a trademark or a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.


  1. Adams JB, van Emden HF (1972) The biological properties of aphids and their host plant relationships. In: van Emden HF (eds) Aphid technology. Academic, London, pp 48–104Google Scholar
  2. Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckendorf EA (2005) Soybean aphid Aphis glycines Matsumura (Homoptera, Aphididae) in South Dakota: impact on soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill (Fabales, Fabaceae) development and yield. Master’s thesis, South Dakota State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark AJ, Perry KL (2002) Transmissibility of field isolates of soybean viruses by Aphis glycines. Plant Dis 86:1219–1222Google Scholar
  5. Cooper RL, Martin RJ, McBlain BA, Fioritto RJ, St. Martin SK, Calip-DuBois A, Schmitthenner AF (1990) Ripley soybean. Crop Sci 30:963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domier LL, Latorre IJ, Steinlage TA, McCoppin N, Hartman GL (2003) Variability and transmission by Aphis glycines of North American and Asian Soybean mosaic virus isolates. Arch Virol 148:1925–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibson RW, Plumb RT (1977) Breeding plants for resistance to aphid infestation. In: Harris KF, Maramorosch K (eds) Aphids and virus vectors. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris MK (1980) Arthropod–plant interactions related to agriculture, emphasizing host plant resistance. In: Harris MK (ed) Biology and breeding for resistance to arthropods and pathogens in agricultural plants. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, and Agency for International Development, University of California, Berkeley, pp 23–51Google Scholar
  9. Hill CB, Li Y, Hartman GL (2004) Resistance to the soybean aphid in soybean germplasm. Crop Sci 44:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill CB, Li Y, Hartman GL (2006a) A single dominant gene for resistance to the soybean aphid in the soybean cultivar Dowling. Crop Sci 46:1601–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill CB, Li Y, Hartman GL (2006b) Soybean aphid resistance in soybean Jackson is controlled by a single dominant gene. Crop Sci 46:1606–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kennedy GG (1976) Host plant resistance and the spread of plant viruses. Environ Entomol 5:827–832Google Scholar
  13. Kogan M, Ortman EE (1978) Antixenosis—a new term proposed to replace Painter’s ‘nonpreference’ modality of resistance. Bull Entomol Soc Am 24:175–176Google Scholar
  14. Li Y, Hill CB, Hartman GL (2004) Effect of three resistant soybean genotypes on the fecundity, mortality, and maturation of soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 97:1106–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luzzi BM, Boerma HR, Hussy RS, Phillips DV, Tamulonis J, Finnerty SL, Wood ED (1997) G93-9223 soybean germplasm. Crop Sci 37:1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mensah C, DiFonzo C, Nelson RL, Wong D (2005) Resistance to soybean aphid in early maturing soybean germplasm. Crop Sci 45:2228–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Myers SW, Gratton C, Wolkowski RP, Hogg DB, Wedberg JL (2005) Effect of soil potassium availability on soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) population dynamics and soybean yield. J Econ Entomol 98:113–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nault BA, All JN, Boerma HR (1992) Influence of soybean planting date and leaf age on resistance to corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 21:264–268Google Scholar
  19. NGRP (National Genetic Resources Program) (2006) U. S. Department of Agriculture, Germplasm Resources Information Network, National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville. Available at Cited 06 May 2006Google Scholar
  20. Painter WH (1951) Insect resistance in crop plants. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Panda N, Khush GS (1995) Host plant resistance to insects. CAB International, OxonGoogle Scholar
  22. Pedersen P (2004) Soybean growth and development. Publication PM 1945, University Extension, Iowa State University, AmesGoogle Scholar
  23. Puterka GJ, Peters DC (1988) Rapid technique for determining greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes B, C, E and F. J Econ Entomol 81:396–399Google Scholar
  24. Rutledge CE, O’Neil RJ, Fox TB, Landis DA (2004) Soybean aphid predators and their use in integrated pest management. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SAS Institute (2002) SAS® Proprietary Software, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith CM (2005) Plant resistance to arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Venette RC, Ragsdale DW (2004) Assessing the invasion by soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae): where will it end? Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang SY, Bao XZ, Sun YJ, Chen RL, Zhai BP (1996) Effect of population dynamics of the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) on soybean growth and yield. Soyb Sci 15:243–247Google Scholar
  29. Wiseman BR (1998) Assessment of soybean germplasm for multiple insect resistance. In: Clement SL, Quisenberry SS (eds) Global plant and genetic resources for insect-resistant crops. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 101–129Google Scholar
  30. Wiseman BR (1999) Successes in plant resistance to insects. In: Wiseman BR, Webster JA (eds) Economic, environmental, and social benefits of resistance in field crops. Proc Thomas Say Publ Entomol, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  31. Zar JH (1998) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis S. Hesler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenton E. Dashiell
    • 1
  • Jonathan G. Lundgren
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA, Agricultural Research ServiceNorth Central Agricultural Research LaboratoryBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations