Advertisement

Euphytica

, 154:53 | Cite as

QTL analysis of variation for vigour in rose

  • Z. Yan
  • P. B. Visser
  • T. Hendriks
  • T. W. Prins
  • P. Stam
  • O. DolstraEmail author
Article

Abstract

The improvement of energy efficiency in the greenhouse production of cut rose and pot rose can be achieved through the use of rose cultivars having vigorous growth. A better understanding of the inheritance of vigour and its related traits will assist the breeding activities. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses were performed with the help of an integrated linkage map of a diploid rose population originating from a cross between Rosa multiflora-derived genotypes. The underlying datasets for ten vigour-related traits were collected in an evaluation study of this population in two greenhouse experiments with suboptimal temperatures for growth. We identified ten chromosomal regions, scattered over the seven linkage groups, containing QTLs for these traits. Considering each trait separately, we detected a total of 42 QTLs. Among these QTLs, 24 were found in both of the experiments, eight and ten were specific to either of the two experiments. The number of QTLs for individual traits varied from three to five with a respective contribution to the phenotypic variation from 12 to 35%. QTLs for highly correlated traits frequently co-localized, indicating a common genetic basis. Clustering of QTLs for different traits was noted in some chromosome regions, for instance, one on chromosome 2 included major QTLs for eight of ten traits under study, suggesting co-localization of several separate genes or/and the occurrence of various genes having pleiotropic effects. The discovery of markers associated to QTL regions is in roses the first step towards marker-assisted selection for vigour improvement enabling the transfer of useful QTL-alleles of R. multiflora to pot and cut roses.

Keywords

Genetic mapping Quantitative trait locus Rosa Vigour-related traits 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate Prof. Dr. Thomas Debener, Hannover University, Hannover, Germany, for providing the mapping population. This work was financed by the Dutch Product Board for Horticulture (PT), The Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment (NOVEM) and the companies Plant Research International B.V., Terra Nigra B.V., Agriom B.V. and Poulsen Roser Aps.

References

  1. Bouchez A, Hospital F, Causse M, Gallais A, Charcosset A (2002) Marker-assisted introgression of favourable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162:1945–1959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Crespel L, Chirollet M, Durel E, Zhang D, Meynet J, Gudin S (2002) Mapping of qualitative and quantitative phenotypic traits in Rosa using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:1207–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debener T, Mattiesch L (1999) Construction of a genetic linkage map for roses using RAPD and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 99:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Debener T, Mattiesch L, Vosman B (2001a) A molecular marker map for roses. Acta Hortic 547:283–287Google Scholar
  5. Debener T, von Malek B, Mattiesch L, Kaufmann H (2001b) Genetic and molecular analysis of important characters in roses. Acta Hortic 547:45–49Google Scholar
  6. El-Lithy ME, Clerkx EJM, Ruys GJ, Koornneef M, Vreugdenhil D (2004) Quantitative trait locus analysis of growth-related traits in a new Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. Plant Physiol 135:444–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grattapaglia D, Sederoff R (1994) Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudotestcross mapping strategy and RAPD markers. Genetics 137:1121–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hund A, Fracheboud Y, Soldati A, Frascaroli E, Salvi S, Stam P (2004) QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress. Theor Appl Genet 109:618–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jansen RC, Stam P (1994) High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136:1447–1455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kearsey MJ (1998) The principles of QTL analysis (a minimal mathematics approach). J Exp Bot 49:1619–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearsey MJ, Farquhar AGL (1998) QTL analysis in plants: where are we now? Heredity 80:137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehmann EL (1975) Nonparametrics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackay TC (2001) The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Ann Rev Genet 35:303–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schon CC (2004) QTL analyses of complex traits with cross validation, bootstrapping and other biometric methods. Euphytica 137:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piepho HP (2000) A mixed model approach to mapping quantitative trait loci in barley on the basis of multiple environment data. Genetics 156:2043–2052PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajapakse S, Byrne DH, Zhang L, Anderson N, Arumuganathan K, Ballard RE (2001) Two genetic linkage maps of tetraploid roses. Theor Appl Genet 103:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stam P (1993) Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: JoinMap. Plant J 3:739–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stam P (2003) Marker-assisted introgression: speed at any cost? In: Van Hintum TJL, Lebeda A, Pink D, Schut JW (eds) Proceedings of the eucarpia leafy vegetable conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 19–21 March 2003, pp 117–124Google Scholar
  19. Tsarouhas V, Gullberg U, Lagercrantz U (2002) An AFLP and RFLP linkage map and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of growth traits in Salix. Theor Appl Genet 105:277–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Ooijen JW, Boer MP, Jansen RC Maliepaard C (2002) MapQTL 4.0: software for the calculation of QTL positions on genetic maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. Voorrips RE (2001) MapChart version 2.0: windows software for the graphic presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu Y (2001) Quantitative trait loci: separating, pyramiding, and cloning. Plant Breed Rev 15:85–139Google Scholar
  23. Yan Z, Dolstra O, Prins TW, Stam P, Visser PB (2005a) Vigour evaluation in rose genetics and breeding. Euphytica 145(3):339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yan Z, Denneboom C, Hattendorf A, Dolstra O, Debener T, Stam P, Visser PB (2005b) Construction of an integrated map of rose with AFLP, SSR, PK, RGA, RFLP, SCAR and morphological markers. Theor Appl Genet 110:766–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Yan
    • 1
  • P. B. Visser
    • 1
    • 3
  • T. Hendriks
    • 2
    • 4
  • T. W. Prins
    • 1
  • P. Stam
    • 2
  • O. Dolstra
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Plant Research International B.V.Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Laboratory of Plant BreedingWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Agriom B.V.De KwakelThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Laboratoire de la Physiologie de la Différenciation VégétaleUniversité de Sciences et Technologies de LilleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations