Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 154, Issue 1–2, pp 29–39 | Cite as

Genetic impacts of fiber sugar content on fiber characters in Sea Island cotton, Gossypium barbadense L.

  • Yong-Jun Mei
  • Zi-Hong YeEmail author
  • Zun Xu
Article

Abstract

A genetic model with additive effect, dominant effect, additive × additive effect, and their interaction with environment effect (GE) was employed to analyze the 2-year data of F1 and F2 hybrids from 5 × 4 diallel cross, whose parents were Sea Island cotton with different fruit branch types. Unconditional and conditional genetic variances were analyzed to demonstrate genetic impacts of fiber sugar content on fiber characters. Results of unconditional genetic variances showed that dominance × environment interaction effect and additive × additive epistatic effects mainly controlled the genetic variation of fiber sugar content, and environment influenced the inheritance of fiber sugar content. Fiber uniformity, fiber elongation, and fiber micronaire were mainly controlled by dominance × environment effects. Fiber strength was mainly controlled by the interaction of additive × additive epistatic effects and the environment. Analysis of correlation coefficients indicated that the varieties or hybrids with high-fiber sugar content had short fiber, low-fiber uniformity, strength, and fineness, which indicated the close co-variation between fiber quality traits and fiber sugar content. Relatively better fiber quality traits could be obtained effectively through selecting parents with low-fiber sugar. Fiber sugar content of different parents had different genetic effect on fiber quality traits.

Keywords

Conditional genetic analysis Diallel analysis Fiber quality traits Fiber sugar content Gossypium barbadense L. 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by “The President Foundation of Tarim University”. (No. 2004-01) and the Foundation of China Jiliang University (No. 01101-044), project of Department of Education of Zhejiang Province.

References

  1. Allard RW (1988) Future directions in plant population genetics, evolution and breeding. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kehler AL, et al. (eds) Plant population genetics and germplasm resources, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. pp 1–19Google Scholar
  2. Atchley WR, Zhu J (1997) Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in Mice. Genetics 147:765–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman LF (1959) Evidence of non-allelic gene interaction in determining yield, ear height, and kernel row number in corn. Agron J 51:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bora GC, Gupta SN, Tomer YS, Singh S (1998) Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in faba bean (Vicia faba). Indian J Agric Sci 68:212–214Google Scholar
  5. Cao GQ, Zhu J, He CX, Gao YM, Yan JQ, Wu P (2001) Impacts of epistasis and QTL × environment interaction for developmental behavior of plant height in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 103:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasoulas AC, Allard RW (1962) Nonallelic gene interactions in the inheritance of quantitative characters in barley. Genetics 47:899–907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Galanopoulou-Sendouca S, Roupakias D (1999) Performance of cotton F1 hybrids and its relation to the mean yield of advanced bulk generations. Eur J Agron 1:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giridharan MP, Jindal PC (1999) Correlation regression and path-coefficient analysis of biochemical parameters associated with duration of crop growth in grape (Vitis Vinifera). Indian J Agric Sci 69:261–264Google Scholar
  9. Guler M, Sait AM, Ulukan H (2001) Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Eur J Agron 2:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han XM, Liu YX, Song XL (2002) Genetic analysis for fiber traits of new germplasms in Upland cotton. Acta Agron Sin 2:245–248Google Scholar
  11. He CX, Zhu J, Yan JQ (2000) QTL mapping for developmental behavior of panicle dry weight in rice. Sci Agric Sin 22(1):1–9Google Scholar
  12. Ketata H, Smith EL, Edwards LH, McNew RW (1976) Detection of epistatic, additive, and dominance variation in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Crop Sci 16:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, Ying CS, Stansel JW, Khush GS, Paterson AH (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158:1737–1753Google Scholar
  14. Lukens LN, Doebley J (1999) Epistatic and environmental interactions for quantitative trait loci involved in maize evolution. Genet Res 74:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marani A (1968) Heterosis and inheritance of quantitative characters in interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci 8:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mather K, Jinks JL (1982) Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Mei YJ, Xu Z (1998) Stability analysis of fiber sugar content on varieties of Sea Island cotton. China Cotton 13(6):22–24Google Scholar
  18. Meredith WR Jr (1984) In: R Kohel et al. (ed) Quantitative genetics in cotton. Agronomy 24:132–150Google Scholar
  19. Meredith WR Jr (1990) Yield and fiber quality potential for second generation cotton hybrids. Crop Sci 30:1045–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meredith WR Jr et al (1970) Relative performance of F1 and F2 hybrids from doubled haploids and their parent varieties in Upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 10:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller PA, Marani A (1963) Heterosis and combing ability in diallel crosses on upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 3:441–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller RG (1974) The jacknife: a review. Biometrika 61:1–15Google Scholar
  23. Ogg AG Jr, Seefeldt SS (1999) Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgress (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci 47:74–80Google Scholar
  24. Pettigrew WT (2001) Environment effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Sci 41:1108–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pooni HS, Coombs DJ, Jinks PS (1987) Detection of epistatsis and linkage of interacting genes in the presence of reciprocal differences. Heredity 58:257–266Google Scholar
  26. Razi H, Assad MT (1999) Copmarsion of selection criteria in normal and limited irrigation in sunflower. Euphytica 105:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell JJ, Yu J, Park YH, Lazo GR (2001) Molecular mapping and characterization of traits controlling fiber quality in cotton. Euphytica 121(2):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shen XL, Zhang TZ, Guo WZ, Zhu XF, Zhang XY (2006) Mapping fiber and yield QTLs with main, epistatic, and QTL (× environment interaction effects in recombinant inbred lines of Upland cotton. Crop Sci 46:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verbaln LM, Murray JC (1969) A diallel analysis of several fiber property traits in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Sci 9:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang XD (1991) Genetic analysis for heterosis and inbreeding depression. Acta Agron Sin 1:18–23Google Scholar
  31. Wang XD, Pan JJ (1991) The genetic analysis of hybrid heterosis in Upland Cotton. Acta Agron Sin 17(1):18–23Google Scholar
  32. Wright S (1920) The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 6:320–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–585Google Scholar
  34. Wu JX, Zhu J, Xu FH, Ji DF (1995) Genetic analysis for heterosis of fiber traits in Upland cotton. Acta Gossypii Sin 7(4):217–222Google Scholar
  35. Xu ZC, Zhu J (1999) An approach for predicting heterosis based on an additive, dominance and additive × additive model with environment interaction. Heredity 82:510–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu Z, Mei YJ, Zhang XL (1998) Study on the sugar content in fiber of Sea Island cotton and microstructure with fiber strength. Acta Gossypii Sin 25(4):19–21Google Scholar
  37. Xu Z, You BC et al (1992) Study on sugar content in cotton fiber by Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry. Bull Text 13(6):22–24Google Scholar
  38. Yan JQ, Zhu J, He CX, Benmoussa M, Wu P (1998) Molecular dissection of developmental behavior of plant height in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Genetics 150(3):1257–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ye ZH, Zhu J (2000) Genetic analysis on flowering and boll setting in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): III. Genetic behavior at different developing stages. Acta Genet Sin 27(9):800–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ye ZH, Zhu J (2001) Genetic analysis on flowering and boll setting in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): II. Genetic behavior at different fruiting sites. Acta Agron Sin 27(2):243–252Google Scholar
  41. Ye ZH, Lu ZZ, Zhu J (2003) Genetic analysis for developmental behavior of some seed quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypum hirsutum L.). Euphytica 129(2):183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan YL, Zhang TZ, Guo WZ, Pan JJ, Kohel RJ (2005) Diallel analysis of superior fiber quality properties in selected Upland cottons. Acta Genet Sin 32(1):79–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu J, Weir BS (1994) Analysis of cytoplasm and maternal effects: I. A genetic models for diplod plant seeds and animals. Theor Appl Genet 89(3):153–159Google Scholar
  44. Zhu J (1992) Mixed model approaches for estimating genetic variances and covariance. J Biomath 1:1–11Google Scholar
  45. Zhu J (1995) Analysis of conditional genetic effects and variance components in developmental. Genetics 141:1633–1639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu J (1997) Analysis methods for genetic models. Chinese Agricultural Publish House, Beijing, pp. 163–201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Plant Science and TechnologyTarim UniversityAlarXingjiangP.R. China
  2. 2.College of Life ScienceChina Jiliang UniversityHangzhouP.R. China

Personalised recommendations