Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of chromosome 5sh from Gossypium barbadense L. on flower production in G. hirsutum L.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium spp.) yield is directly determined by mature bolls that developed from squares and flowers. The first four to six weeks of flowering accounts for the majority of lint yield in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) for most cultivated areas of the southern USA cotton belt. In this study, we evaluated 13 cotton chromosome substitution lines (CS-B) and their chromosome specific-F2 hybrids, TM-1, 3–79, and six cultivars for the number of flowers produced during the first four weeks of flowering. Results showed that CS-B05sh produced more flowers than TM-1 and 3–79 from 10 July to 5 August. The results suggest that when the short arm of chromosome 5 was substituted from 3–79 (G. barbadense L.) into TM-1 (G. hirsutum) a positive genetic association with flower numbers during this flowering period was exhibited. CS-B05sh had comparable flower numbers with three cultivars, Deltapine 90, Phytogen 355, and Stoneville 474 and more flowers than, Sure Grow 747, Sure Grow 125, and Deltapine 5415. Different patterns for additive and dominance effects on cumulative flowers were observed across weeks of flowering. Dominance effects were more apparent during the early part of the flowering period while additive effects were more apparent towards the end of the flowering period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CS-B:

chromosome or chromosome arm substituted from Gossypium barbadense into G. hirsutum

AD:

additive dominance genetic model

References

  • Al-Quadhy RS, Morris WR, Mumm RF (1988) Chromosomal locations of genes for traits associated with lodging in winter wheat. Crop Science 28:631–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchley WR (1984) Ontogeny, timing of development, and genetic variance-covariance structure. Am Nat 123:519– 540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchley WR, Zhu J (1997) Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in mice. Genetics 147:765–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berke TG, Baenziger PS, Morris WR (1992) Chromosomal location of wheat quantitative trait loci affecting agronomic performance, using reciprocal chromosome substitutions. Crop Science 32:628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz C, Nichols RL (2005) Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity. Crop Sci 45:1497–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biles S, Cothren J (2001) Flowering and yield response of cotton to application of mepiquat Chloride and PGR-IV. Crop Sci 41:1834–1837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Zhu J, Wu J (1999) Developmental genetic analysis of boll number and seed cotton yield per plant at different fruiting stages in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J of Zhejiang Agricultural University 25(2):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Zhu J, Wu J (2000) Genetic study on seed cotton yield at different boll setting stages and fruiting sites in upland cotton. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 33(4):97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitholt J (1993) Cotton boll retention and its relationship to lint yield. Crop Sci 33:486–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitholt J, Meredith W (1998) Yield, flowering, and leaf area index of okra-leaf and normal-leaf cotton isolines. Crop Sci 38:643–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Wu J, Saha S, Stelly D (2004) Chromosome substitution lines from Gossypium barbadense L. as sources for G. hirsutum L. improvement. In: Fischer t (ed), New directions for a diverse planet: Proc. of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. [CD-ROM], 26 September-1 October, 2004. Brisbane, Australia, Pub. The Regional Institute Ltd. Gosford NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JN, Wu J, McCarty JC, Saha S, Gutierrez O, Hayes R, Stelly D (2006) Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cultivars: I. Yield and yield components. Crop Sci 46:1169–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohel RJ, Endrizzi JE, White TG (1977) An evaluation of Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome 6 and 17 in the G. hirsutum L. genome. Crop Science 17:404–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JZ, Kohel RJ (1983) Evaluation of 6 substitution lines in cotton. Acta Agronomica Sinica 9:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RG (1974) The jackknife: a review. Biometrika 61:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1971) Estimation of variance and covariance components MINQUE theory. J Multivariate Anal 1:257– 275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren L, Guo W, Zhang T (2002) Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting yield and fiber properties in chromosome 16 in cotton using substitution line. Acta Botanica Sinica 44:815–820

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Wu J, Jenkins JN, McCarty Jr. JC, Gutiérrez OA, Stelly DM, Percy RG, Raska DA (2004) Effect of chromosome substitutions from Gossypium barbadense L. 3–79 into G. hirsutum L. TM-1 on agronomic and fiber traits. J Cotton Sci 8:162–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Jenkins JN, Wu J, McCarty JC, Gutiérrez OA, Percy RG, Cantrell RG, Stelly DM (2006) Effects of chromosome-specific introgression in upland cotton on fiber and agronomic traits. Genetics 172:1927–1938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS software version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

  • Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelly DM, Saha S, Raska DA, Jenkins JN, McCarty Jr. JC, Gutierrea OA (2005) Registration of 17 upland (Gossypium hirsutum) cotton germplasm lines disomic for different G. barbadense chromosome or arm substitution. Crop Sci 45:2663–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Jenkins JN, Watson CE, McCarty JC, Creech RG (1996) Evaluation of genetic variances, heritabilities, and correlations for yield and fiber traits among cotton F2 hybrid populations. Euphytica 91:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhu J, Xu F, Ji D (1995) Analysis of genetic effect × environment interactions for yield traits in upland cotton (Chinese). Heredita 17(5):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Saha S, Stelly DM (2006) An additive-dominance model to determine chromosomal effects in chromosome substitution lines and other germplasms. Theor Appl Genet 112:391–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Zhu J, He C, Benmoussa M, Wu P (1998) Quantitative trait loci analysis for developmental behavior of tiller number in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor Appl Genet 97:267–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Zhu J (2001a) Genetic analysis of flowering and boll setting in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) II. The genetic behavior of different fruiting sites. Acta Agronomica Sinica 27(2):243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Zhu J (2001b) Genetic analysis of flowering and boll setting in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Flowering behavior and its influencing factors. J of Zhejiang University (Agricuture and Life Sciences) 27(1):62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Zhu J (2001c) Genetic analysis of flowering and boll setting in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) III. Genetic behavior at different developing stages Acta Genetica Sinica 27(9):800–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemetra RS, Morris WR (1988) Effects of an intercultivaral chromosome substitution on winetrhardiness and vernalization in wheat. Geneticics 119:453–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zemetra RS, Morris WR, Schmidt JW (1986) Gene locations for heading date using reciprocal chromosome substitutions in winter wheat. Crop Science 26:531–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1989) Estimation of genetic variance components in the general mixed model. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, U.S.A. (Diss. Abstr. DA8924291)

  • Zhu J (1993) Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. (Chinese). Journal of Biomathematics 8(1):32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1994) General genetic models and new analysis methods for quantitative traits (Chinese). J Zhejiang Agric Univ 20(6):551–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1995) Analysis of conditional effects and variance components in developmental genetics. Genetics 141(4):1633–1699

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack C. McCarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarty, J.C., Wu, J., Saha, S. et al. Effects of chromosome 5sh from Gossypium barbadense L. on flower production in G. hirsutum L.. Euphytica 152, 99–107 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9183-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9183-7

Keywords

Navigation