, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 71–77 | Cite as

Heterosis for Yield and some Physiological Traits in Hybrid Cotton Cikangza 1



The characterization of yield and yield components, chlorophyll, soluble sugars and N, P, K concentrations, and SOD, POD activities and MDA content was compared between F1 Bt hybrid cotton Cikangza 1 and its male (transgenic Bt gene bollworm resistant linesand female parents, and commercial hybrid Xiangzamian 2 under field condition. The result showed that the hybrid Cikangza 1 had distinct heterosis in lint yield as reflected by HOBP and HOMP values of 25.7% and 28.9%, and the heterosis of bolls per plant was significantly higher than that of boll weight and lint percentage. Significant HOBP, HOMH and HOCP in Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a+b) at SS and FFS were observed in Cikangza 1, suggesting that the higher Chl content at SS and FFS is important for achieving potential yield, and thereafter may aid in identification of parental lines and hybrid combination. The results also elucidated that the HOBP and HOMP of N, P and K concentrations, and SOD and POD activities were much smaller in comparison with those of Chl parameters. However, Cikangza 1 has higher soluble sugars content, and N and K concentrations at FFS and BOS, than that of commercial hybrid Xiangzamian 2, denoting that N and K nutrient might perform an important function in senescence, and more additional application of N and K fertilizer at late growth stages of hybrid may be beneficial to keep more nutrient for late growth stage and delay the senescence.


antioxidant enzymes chlorophyll cotton (gossypium hirsutum l.) heterosis nutrient metabolism 



Bacillus thuringiensis


heterosis over better of parents


Heterosis over mean of parents


heterosis over the control hybrid


superoxide dismutase






Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnon, D.I., 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts phenoloxidases in beta vultaris. Plant Physiol 24: 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, A.K. & N.B. Patil, 1993. Producing quality cotton from commercial cotton hybrids grown under rainfed conditions in India. Technical Seminar at the 52nd Plenary Meeting of the International Cotton Advisary Committee, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  3. Chaudhry, M.R., 1997. Commercial cotton hybrids. The Int Cotton Advisory Committee Recorder XV(2): 3–14.Google Scholar
  4. Dong, H.Z., W.J. Li, W. Tang & D.M. Zhang, 2004. Development of hybrid Bt cotton in China- a successful integration of transgenic technology and conventional techniques. Curr Sci 86: 778–782.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, L.T., 1993. Crop Evolution, Adaptation, and Yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Godoy, A.S. & G.A. Palomo, 1999. Genetic analysis of earliness in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) II. Yield and lint percentage. Euphytica 105: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jing, S.H., C.Z. Xing, Y.L. Yuan, S.L. Liu, H.L. Wang & L.P.Guo, 1997. Study on breeding and utilization of hybrid cotton resistant to insect. China Cotton 24(7): 15–17.Google Scholar
  8. Li, J.F., 2005. Research on Chinese Cotton hybrid vigor utilization. Jiangxi Cotton 27(1): 3–7.Google Scholar
  9. Meredith, W.R. Jr, 1990. Yield and fiber-quality potential for secondgeneration cotton hybrids. Crop Sci 30: 1045–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, J.C. & I.M. Verhalen, 1969. Genetics of earliness, yield, and fiber properties in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Sci 9: 752–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Qian, D.S., X.S. Chen, X.G. Zhang, J.C. Di & N.Y. Xu, 2000. Advances in physiological and biochemical study or hybrid vigor in cotton. Acta Gossypii Sinica 12(1): 45–48.Google Scholar
  12. Sinha, S.K. & R. Khana, 1975. Physiological, biochemical and genetic basic of heterosis. Advan Agron 27: 123–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Srivastava, H.K., 2000. Nuclear control and mitochondrial transcript processing with relevance to cytoplasmic male sterility in higher plants. Curr Sci 79 (2): 176–186.Google Scholar
  14. Stuber, C., 1999. Biochemistry, molecular biology and physiology of heterosis. In: J.G. Coors & S. Pandey (Eds.), The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, pp. 173–183. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
  15. Wang, R.H. & X.L. Li, 2000. Progresses on hybrid cotton and its future studies. Scientia Agric Sinica 33: 111–112.Google Scholar
  16. Wu, F., G. Zhang & P. Dominy, 2003. Four barley genotypes respond differently to cadmium: Lipid peroxidation and activities of antioxidant capacity. Environ Exp Bot 50: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xing, Z.Z., S.R. Jing, L.P. Guo, Y.L. Yuan & H.L. Wang, 2000. Study on heterosis and combining ability of transgenic Bt cotton,. Acta Gossypii Sinica 12(1): 6–11.Google Scholar
  18. Zhang Z.S., X.B. Li, Y.H. Xiao, M. Luo, D. Liu, S.L. Huang & F.X. Zhang, 2003. Combining ability and heterosis between high strength lines and transgenic Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) bollworm-resistant lines in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agric Sci in China 2(1): 13–18.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang, T.Z. & C.M. Tang, 2000. Commercial production of transgenic Bt insect resistant cotton varieties and the resistance management for bollworm. China Sci Bull 45: 1249–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang, T.Z. & J.J. Pan, 1999. Hybrid seed production in cotton. In: A.S. Basra (ed.), Heterosis and Hybrid Seed Production in Agronomic Crops, pp. 149–184. Food Production Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture & BiotechnologyZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Cixi Research Institute of Agriculture ScienceCixiChina

Personalised recommendations