Skip to main content

Continuous cropping systems and weed selection

Euphytica volume 148, pages 61–73 (2006)Cite this article

Summary

Changes in the weed flora of agro-ecosystems can occur as long-term changes or temporary fluctuations in species composition. The rate at which weed population shifts occur depends on the selection pressure imposed, genetic variability among weed populations, plant characteristics and environmental factors. Agronomic practices associated with cropping systems including crop rotation, tillage, herbicide use, soil amendments, and mechanization of harvesting that impart a range of selection pressures on weed populations are discussed in this review. Widespread use of herbicides has had the greatest impact on weed selection in recent years. Evolution of herbicide resistant weeds presents an enormous challenge to farmers. Development of herbicide tolerant crops has provided another tool for farmers however the selection pressure on weeds and potential impact on weed population shifts will require judicious use of this technology. Simulation models provide an excellent opportunity to predict future weed population shifts in response to management practices. Further insight into future management changes on weed selection must proceed towards an investigation of the processes rather than the outcomes. In particular, this must involve an understanding of the ecological factors and processes that are likely to determine the weed responses to particular management regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Andersson, T.N. & P. Milberg, 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop rotation and nitrogen. Weed Sci 46: 30–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré, C.L., A.L. Scopel, C.M. Ghersa & R.A. Sánchez, 1987. The population ecology of Datura ferox in soybean crops. A simulation approach incorporating seed dispersal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 19: 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw, R.E., 1994. Rotation affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Tech 8: 728–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw, R.E., F.O. Larney, C.W. Lindwall & G.C. Kozub, 1994. Crop rotation and tillage effects on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian Praries. Weed Technol 8: 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borger, C., D. Minkey & H. Spafford Jacob, 2002. Weed seed predation in a low rainfall cropping zone of Western Australia: Spatial variation of weed seed predation. In: H. Spafford Jacob, J. Dodd & J.H. Moore (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Australian Weeds Conference, Perth, Australia, p. 403. Plant Protection Society of WA.

  • Buhler, D.D., 1998. Tillage systems and weed population dynamics and management. In: J.L. Hatfield, D.D. Buhler & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Integrated Weed and Soil Management, pp. 223–246. Ann Arbor Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos, N.R., M. Anders, L.R. Oliver, C.C. Wheeler, S. Payne & M.S. Mobley, 1999. Weed shift in cropping systems involving transgenic cultivars. AAES Research Series 476: 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardina, J., T.M. Webster & C.P. Herms, 1998. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on soil seedbank characteristics. Asp Appl Biol 51: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbach, N. & J.M. Meynard, 1996. Modelling the influence of cropping system on gene flow for herbicide resistant rapeseed. Presentation of model structure. In: 10eme Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon. Paris: Association Nationale pour la Protection des Plantes, pp. 223–230.

  • Cousens, R. & M. Mortimer, 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussans, G.W. & S.R. Moss, 1982. Population dynamics of annual grass weeds. In: Proceedings of the 1982 British Crop Protection Symposium ‘Decision Making in the Practice of Crop Protection’, pp. 91–98.

  • Derksen, D.A., G.P. Lafond, A.G. Thomas, H.A. Loeppky & C.J. Swanton, 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci 41: 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, D.A., G. Thomas, G.P. Lafond, H.A. Loeppky & C.J. Swanton, 1994. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: Fallow within tillage systems. Weed Sci 42: 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, D.A., R.L. Anderson, R.E. Blackshaw & B. Maxwell, 2002. Weed dynamcis and weed management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plain. Agron J 95: 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, A.J., P.B. Neve & F.P. Smith, 2003. Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Res 43: 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, J., J.P. Del Monte & C. Lopez-Fando, 1999. Weed seedbank response to crop rotation and tillage in semi arid agroecosystems. Weed Sci 47: 67–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, P.M., D.L. Michalk & B.M. Sindel, 2000. Weed management in pasture systems. In: B.M. Sindel (Ed.), Australian Weed Management Systems, pp. 307–328. R.G. and F.J. Richardson, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, S.O., 1999. Weed management: Implications of herbicide resistant crops. In: P.L. Traynor & J.H. Westwood (Eds.), Ecological Effects of Pest Resistance Genes in Managed Ecosystems, pp. 21–25. Information Systems for Biotechnology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S.R., C. Alzugaray, P.S. Torres & P. Lewis, 1997. The effect of different tillage systems on the composition of the seedbank. Weed Res 37: 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcella, F., 1999. Weed seed bank dynamics under herbicide tolerant crops. The 1999 Brighton Conference–Weeds, 409–416.

  • Forcella, F., D.D. Buhler & M.E. McGiffen, 1994. Pest management and crop residues. In: J.L. Hatfield & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Crop Residue Management, Adv. Soil Sci., pp. 173–189. Lewis Publishers, Boca Taon, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud-Williams, R.J., R.J. Chancellor & D.S.H. Drennan, 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res 21: 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud-Williams, R.J. & R.J. Chancellor, 1982. A survey of grass weeds in cereals in central southern England. Weed Res 22: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud-Williams, R.J., D.S.H. Drennan & R.J. Chancellor, 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J Appl Ecol 20: 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, J.J., L.J. Rew, R.W. Medd, G. Robinson & S. Walker, 1999. On farm monitoring of weed occurrence and density in the northern grain region. In: A.C. Bishop, M. Boersma & C.D. Barnes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Australian Weeds Conference, Hobart, pp. 31–34. Tasmanian Weed Society, Australia.

  • Gill, G.S. 1996. Management of herbicide resistant ryegrass in Western Australia–research and its adoption. In: R.C.H. Shepherd (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 542–545. Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc. Australia.

  • Gill, G.S., M.L. Poole & J.E. Holmes, 1987. Competition between wheat and brome grass in Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 27: 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P., 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.H., 1986. Invasion of Mediterranean ecoystems by weeds. In: B. Dell, A.J.M. Hopkins & B.B. Lamont (Eds.), ‘Resilience in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems’, pp. 129–145. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, H. & J.C. Streibig, 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. In: H.M. LeBaron & J. Gressel (Eds.), Herbicide Resistance in Plants, Chapter 4, pp. 57–79. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzler, B., 1998. Are Roundup Ready weeds in your future? http://www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/qrt98-4/roundupfuture.htm.

  • Hartzler, B., 2000. Weed population dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Integrated Crop Management Conference, 20–29 November, Ames, Iowa, USA.

  • Harper, J.L., J.T. Wiliams & G.R. Sagar, 1965. The behaviour of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants from seed. J Ecol 53: 273–2860

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, I., 2000. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds, Weed Science Society of America and the Herbicide Action Committee, http://www.weedscience.com/.

  • Heenan, D.P., A.C. Taylor, B.R. Cullis & W.J. Lill, 1994. Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW Aust J Agric Res 45: 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J.S., 1990. Fitness and ecological adaptability of herbicide-resistant biotypes. In: M.B. Green, H.M. LeBaron & W.K. Moberg (Eds.), Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals: From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies, pp. 419–429. American Chemical Soc., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C.L., A.M. Mortimer, P. Gould & R.D. Putwain, 1991. The dispersal of weeds: Seed movement in arable agriculture. Proc Brighton Crop Prot Conf 2: 821–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, L., 1982. The long-term effects of fertilizer application and three rotations on weed communities in wheat (after 21–22 years at Indian Head, Saskatchewan). Can J Plant Sci 62: 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, L., S. Tessier & F.B. Dyck, 1991. Tillage and rotation influences on weed community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in southwestern Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 71: 783–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISAAA, 2003. Global status of commercialised transgenic crops: 2003. ISAAA Briefs No. 30 2003 http://www.isaaa.org/.

  • Jasieniuk, M., A.L. Brûlé-Babel & I.N. Morrison, 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44: 176–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jasieniuk, M. & B.D. Maxwell, 2001. Plant diversity: New insights from molecular biology and genomics technology. Weed Sci 49: 257–265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lafond, G.P., S. Brandt, D. McAndrew, E. Stobbe & S. Tessier, 1990. Tillage systems and crop production. In: G.P. Lafond & D.B. Fowler (Eds.), Crop management for conservation, pp. 155–201. University of Saskatchewan Ext. Press, Saskatoon, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafond, G.P., D.A. Derksen, H.A. Loeppky & D. Struthers, 1994. An evaluation of conservation tillage and continuous cropping systems in east central Saskatchewan. J Soil Water Conserv 49: 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Légère, A., C. Lemieux, R.R. Simmard & C. Lapierre, 1993. Response of weed communities to fertility and tillage. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Quantitative Approaches in Weed and Herbicide Research and their Practical Application, pp. 41–48. EWRS, Braunschweig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Légère, A. & N. Samson, 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weeds Sci 47: 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle, D., B. Verbeek, R.D. Cousens & N. Coombes, 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res 36: 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle, D. & C.E. Murphy, 2000. Cultural management methods. In: B.M. Sindel (Ed.), Australian Weed Management Systems, pp. 123–138. R.G. and F.J. Richardson, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle, D., G.S. Gill, C.E. Murphy, S.R. Walker, R.D. Cousens, S. Mokhtari, S. Peltzer, R. Coleman & D.J. Luckett, 2001. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Invited review Aust J Agric Res 52: 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, M., 1989. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation, and crop genotype on canopy relations and yields on an intercrop/weed mixture. Field Crops Res 22: 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, M. & T. Ohno, 1998. Crop rotation and legume residue effects on weed emergence and growth: Applications for weed management. In: J.L Hatfield, D.D Buhler & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Integrated Weed and Soil Management, pp. 181–222. Ann Arbor Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, B. & D.E. Stoltenberg, 1998. Tillage systems and crop residue management impacts on soil physical properties: Implications for weed management. In: J.L. Hatfield, D.D. Buhler & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Integrated Weed and Soil Management, pp. 87–106. Ann Arbor Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, E.G., 1988. Structural changes of weed communities and populations. Vegetatio 58: 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M.W., K. Al-Khatib & L. Maddux, 2000. Weed community shifts associated with continuous glyphosate applications in corn and soybean rotation. Proc Western Soc Weed Sci 53: 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.M. & S. Powles, 1996. Managing herbicide resistant annual ryegrass, southern Australian research. In: R.C.H. Shepherd (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 537–541. Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc. Australia.

  • Maxwell, B.D., M.L. Roush & S.R. Radosevich, 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol 4: 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, B.D. & C. Ghersa, 1992. The influence of weed seed dispersal versus the effect of competition on crop yield. Weed Technol 6: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, B.D. & A.M. Mortimer, 1994. Selection for herbicide resistance. In: S.B. Powles & J.A.M. Holtum (Eds.), Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry, pp. 1–25. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalk, D.L., C.C. Byrnes & G.E. Robards, 1976. Effects of grasing management on natural pastures in a marginal area of southeastern Australia. J Range Manage 29: 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, A.E. & I.R. Noble, 1986. Ecological and physiological characters of invading species. In: R.H. Groves & J.J. Burdon (Eds.), Ecology of Biological Invasions: An Australian Perspective, pp. 1–20. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, M.D.K., 1998. Producer attitudes and weed management. In: J.L Hatfield, D.D Buhler & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Integrated weed and soil management, pp. 43–60. Ann Arbor Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzold, K., 1956. Combine-harvesting and weeds. J Agric Eng Res 1: 178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, A., 1974. Survey of the presence of wild oat and blackgrass in parts of the United Kingdom. Weed Res 14: 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles, S.B. & D.G. Bowran, 2000. Crop weed management systems. In: B.M. Sindel (Ed.), Australian Weed Management Systems, pp. 287–306. R.G. and F.J. Richardson, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratley, J.E., 1995. Long term investigations of the effect of tillage practices on crop production at Wagga Wagga, New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric 35: 885–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, C., 2000. Herbicide mode of action and herbicide resistance. In: B.M. Sindel (Ed.), Australian Weed Management Systems pp. 209–225. R.G. and F.J. Richardson, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich, S., J. Holt & C. Ghersa, 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M.A., M. Lamond, C. Preston, S.B. Powles & R.T. Roush, 2002. Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296: 2386–2388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, W., 1996. The use of seed handling techniques to reduce the impact of herbicide resistant Lolium rigidum within continuous cropping systems. In: R.C.H. Shepherd (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 118–121. Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc. Australia.

  • Seefeldt, S., R. Zemetra, F. Yound & S. Jones, 1998. Production of herbicide resistant jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrical) × wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids in the field by natural hybridization. Weed Sci 46: 632–634.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semp Torresen, K. & R. Skuterud, 2002. Plant protection in spring ceral production with reduced tillage. IV. Changes in weed flora and weed seedbank. Crop Protec 21: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaner, D.L., 1997. Herbicide resistance in North America: history, circumstances of development and current situation. In: R. De Prado, J. Jorrin & L. Garcia-Torres (Eds.), Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindel, B.M., 1991. A review of the ecology and control of thistles in Australia. Weed Res 31: 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.F., 1968. The growth of barley grass (Hordeum leporinum) in annual pasture. 4. The effect of some management practices on barley grass content. Aust J Exp Agric Animal Husb 8: 706–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stupnicka-Rodzynkiewicz, E., T. Hochol, T. Labza & J. Pula, 1998. Influence of fallow on weed seedbanks. Aspects of Appl Biol 51: 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, C.J., D.R. Clements & D.A. Derksen, 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: A hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Tech 7: 286–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, D. & D. Lemerle, 2001. Resistance Management in Wheat-dominated Agro-ecosystems. In: S. Powles & D. Shaner (Eds.), Herbicide Resistance Management and World Grain, pp. 165–194. CRC Press. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, D.C. & C.A. Mallory-Smith, 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weeds Sci 45: 337–342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A.G., B. Frick, D.A. Derksen, S.A. Brandt & R.P. Zentner, 1996. Crop rotations and weed community dynamics on the Canadian prairies. P. 227–232. In: H. Brown et al. (Ed.), Proc. Int. Weed Control Congr., 2nd, Copenhagen, Denmark. 25–29 June 1996. Dep. Of Weed Control & Pestic. Ecology, Flakkebjerg, Slagelse, Denmark.

  • Thompson, K. & J.P. Grime, 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67: 893–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, G.A., W.L. Felton, R.D. Murison & R.J. Martin, 2000. Changes in fallow weed species in continuous wheat in northern New South Wales, 1981–90. Aust J Exp Agric 40: 831–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M., 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, G., S. Otto, L. Riello & M. Borin, 1997. Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems. Ag Eco & Env 66: 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Ageing, Office of the Prudential Regulator, GPO Box 9848, Woden, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia

    Clare E. Murphy

  2. EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University & NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, 2650, Australia

    Deirdre Lemerle

Authors
  1. Clare E. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deirdre Lemerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deirdre Lemerle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, C.E., Lemerle, D. Continuous cropping systems and weed selection. Euphytica 148, 61–73 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-5941-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-5941-9

Key Words

  • farming systems
  • herbicide resistant crops
  • population shifts
  • reduced tillage
  • selection pressure
  • weed management