, Volume 146, Issue 1–2, pp 143–148 | Cite as

Chromosome 1D as a possible location of a gene (s) controlling variation between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties for carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) under water-stress conditions

  • Shahram Mohammady-D


Carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) is an important character regarding to water-stress tolerance in wheat. In this study, F2 backcross reciprocal monosomic crosses between varieties Falchetto (low Δ) and 18 monosomic lines of Oxley (high Δ) were used to identify chromosomal location of the gene (s) responsible for carbon isotope discrimination and therefore to detect allelic variation between the two wheat varieties. F2 reciprocal monosomic families were initially assessed for dry matter production. F2 families belonging to the chromosomes that indicated allelic variation for dry matter production were then assessed for Δ. The results revealed that reciprocal families belonging to chromosomes 1B, 7B, 1D and 5D indicated significant differences from which the family having chromosome 1D from Falchetto had the highest difference from its relevant reciprocal. Assessing the reciprocals of this chromosome for evapotranspiration efficiency (ETE) at the F3 disomic generation indicated that the observed variation for Δ was translated into differences for ETE. These results indicate that chromosome 1D of Falchetto is promising in reducing Δ and that the improvement of wheat varieties for ETE can be done by selection for Δ. When selecting for Δ, managing the experiment is easier and there is no need to monitor the water use during the growth cycle.

Key words

carbon isotope monosomic analysis pre-anthesis reciprocal crosses water-stress wheat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al Hakimi, A., P. Monneveux & E. Deleens, 1996. Selection response for carbon isotope discrimination in a Triticum polinicum × T. durum cross: Potential interest for improvement of water efficiency in durum wheat. Plant Breed 115: 317-324.Google Scholar
  2. Araus, J.L., G.A. Slafer, M.P. Reynolds & C. Royo, 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: What should we breed for? Ann Bot 89: 925–940.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buerstmayr, H., M. Lemmens, G. Fedak & P. Ruckenbauer, 1999. Back-cross reciprocal monosomic analysis of Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 98: 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Condon, A.G., G.D. Farquhar & R.A. Richards, 1990. Genotype variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat. Leaf gas exchange and whole plant studies. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehdaie, B. & J.G. Waines, 1994. Genetic-analysis of carbon isotope discrimination and agronomic characters in a bread wheat cross. Theor Appl Genet 88: 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehdaie, B. & J.G. Waines, 1996. Dwarfing genes, water use efficiency and agronomic performance of spring wheat. Can J Plant Sci 76: 707–714.Google Scholar
  7. Farquhar, G.D. & R.A. Richards, 1984. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 539–552.Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths, H., 1993. Carbon isotope discrimination. In: D.O. Hall, J.M.O. Scurlock, H.R. Bolhar-Nordenkampf, R.C. Leegood & S. Long (Eds.), Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment, pp. 181–192. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  9. Law, C.N. & A.J. Worland, 1996. Inter-varietal chromosome substitution lines in wheat- revisited. Euphytica 89: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Law, C.N., J.W. Snape & A.J. Worland, 1987. Aneuploidy in wheat and its uses in genetic analysis. In: F.G.H. Lupton (Ed.), Wheat Breeding: Its Scientific Basis, pp. 71–108. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Merah, O., E. Deleens & P. Monneveux, 1999. Grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination, mineral and silicon content in durum wheat under different precipitation regimes. Physiologia Plantarum 107: 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohammady-D, S., 2002. Inheritance of tolerance to water-stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. UK.Google Scholar
  13. Quarrie, S.A., J. Stojanovic & S. Pekic, 1999. Improving drought resistance in small grain cereals: A case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation 29: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rebetzke, G.J., A.G. Condon, R.A. Richards & G.D. Farquhar, 2002. Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci 42: 739–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Snape, J.W., B.B. Parker & M.D. Gale, 1983. Use of the backcross reciprocal monosomic method for evaluation chromosomal variation for quantitative characters. In: S. Sakamoto (Ed.), Proceedings of 6th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Kyoto, pp. 367–373.Google Scholar
  16. Steel, R.G.D. & J.H. Torrie, 1976. Introduction to Statistics. McGrow-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Change & C.F. Knozak, 1974. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14: 415–421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of ShahrekordShahrekordIran

Personalised recommendations