Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of genotype × environment interactions for yield and fiber quality in cotton performance trials

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant breeding programs involving a wide range of crop plants routinely practice selection (directly or indirectly) for genotypes that display stability for a given trait or set of traits across testing environments through the genotype evaluation process. Genotype stability for trait performance is a direct measure of the presence and effect of genotype × environment interactions, which result from the differential performance of a genotype or cultivar across environments. The genotype evaluation process also requires selection of the proper field trial locations that best represent the target environments the breeding program is directed toward. In this study, we assessed the extent to which genotype × environment interactions affected agronomic performance (lint yield, gin turnout) and fiber quality (fiber length, fiber strength, uniformity index, micronaire, fiber elongation) in a series of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) performance trials in 12 location–year environments in South Carolina. Genotype × environment interactions affecting lint yield were larger in higher yielding environments, while interactions for fiber strength were greater for genotypes with lower mean fiber strength values. Two regions within the South Carolina cotton production areas were identified as proper testing locations for lint yield performance, while testing for fiber strength can be accomplished in any location within the statewide cotton production areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMMI:

additive main effects and multiplicative interactions model

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

G × E:

genotype × environment interaction

IPCA:

interaction principal component axis

References

  • Agrobase Generation II, 2004. Agrobase Generation II users manual. Agronomix Software, Inc., Winnipeg, Mannitoba. Canada.

  • Bilbro, J.D. & L.L. Ray, 1976. Environmental stability and adaptation of several cotton cultivars. Crop Sci 16: 821–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D.T., 2000. Attributes of public and private cotton breeding programs. J Cotton Sci 4: 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, B.F., E.L. Smith & H.O. England, Jr., 1987. Regression and cluster analysis of environmental responses of hybrid and pureline winter wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 27: 659–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. & R.W. Zobel, 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: M.S. Kang & H.G. Gauch (Eds.), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction, pp. 85–122, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, J.H.G., & R.W. Zobel, 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci 37: 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, S., Q.F. Zhang & D.M. Bassett, 1987. Stability in yield and fiber quality of California cotton. Crop Sci 27: 1004–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, S., B.M. Hu & D.M. Bassett, 1990. Quantification and classification of locational effects on cotton cultivar testing programs. Agron J 82: 514–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns & L.P. Lefkovitch, 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci 26: 894–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W.R., 1984. Genotype × environment interactions. In: R.J. Kohel & C.F. Lewis (Eds.), Cotton, pp. 138–141, Vol. 24. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W.R. & R. Bridge. 1984. Genetic contributions to yield changes in upland cotton. In: W. Fehr (Ed.), Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants, pp. 75–86, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A.H., Y. Saranga, M. Menz, C.X. Jiang & R.J. Wright, 2003. QTL analysis of genotype × environment interactions affecting cotton fiber quality. Theor Appl Genet 106: 384–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho, H.-P., 1999. Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron J 91: 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Insitute, 1999. The SAS system for windows. Release 8.2. SAS Inst., Cary, NC. U.S.A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. T. Campbell.

Additional information

The U.S. Government's right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, B.T., Jones, M.A. Assessment of genotype × environment interactions for yield and fiber quality in cotton performance trials. Euphytica 144, 69–78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-4336-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-4336-7

Key Words

Navigation