The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. (II): Cannabigerol predominant plants

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify the genetic mechanism that is responsible for the accumulation of cannabigerol (CBG) in certain phenotypes of Cannabis sativa L. CBG is the direct precursor of the cannabinoids CBD, THC and CBC. Plants strongly predominant in CBG have been found in different fibre hemp accessions. Inbred offspring derived from one such individual were crossed with true breeding THC predominant- and CBD predominant plants, respectively. The segregations in the cross progenies indicate that CBG accumulation is due to the homozygous presence of a minimally functional allele, tentatively called B0, at the single locus B that normally controls the conversion of CBG into THC (allele BT) and/or CBD (allele BD). The fact that CBG accumulating plants have so far been found in European fibre hemp populations that are generally composed of BD/BD plants, and the observation that the here investigated B0 allele possesses a residual ability to convert small amounts of CBG into CBD, make it plausible that this B0 is a mutation of normally functional BD. Therefore, B0 is considered as a member of the BD allelic series encoding a CBD synthase isoform with greatly weakened substrate affinity and/or catalytic capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, R., M. Hunt & J.H. Clark, 1940. Structure of cannabidiol, a product isolated from the marihuana extract of Minnesota wild hemp. J Am Chem Soc 62: 196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fellermeier, M. & M.H. Zenk, 1998. Prenylation of olivetolate by a hemp transferase yields cannabigerolic acid, the precursor of tetrahydrocannabinol. FEBS Lett 427: 283–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fournier, G., C. Richez-Dumanois, J. Duvezin, J.-P. Mathieu & M. Paris, 1987. Identification of a new chemotype in Cannabis sativa: Cannabigerol-dominant plants, biogenetic and agronomic prospects. Planta Med 53: 277–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaoni, Y. & R. Mechoulam, 1964a. Isolation, structure and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish. J Am Chem Soc 86: 1646–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaoni, Y. & R. Mechoulam, 1964b. The structure and synthesis of cannabigerol a new hashish constituent. Proc Chem Soc, March: 82.

  6. Gaoni, Y. & R. Mechoulam, 1966. Cannabichromene, a new active principle in hashish. Chem Commun 1: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hillig, K., 2002. Letter to the editor. J Ind Hemp 7: 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillig, K. & E.P.M. de Meijer, 2004. Letter to the editor ‘On Cannabis’. Econ Bot 58: 328.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillig, K.W. & P.G. Mahlberg, 2004. A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Am J Bot 91: 966–975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandolino, G., 2004. Again on the nature of inheritance of chemotype. Letter to the editor. J Ind Hemp 9: 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mechoulam, R. & Y. Shvo, 1963. Hashish-I, the structure of cannabidiol. Tetrahedron 19: 2073–2078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Meijer, E.P.M., M. Bagatta, A. Carboni, P. Crucitti, V.M.C. Moliterni, P. Ranalli & G. Mandolino, 2003. The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics 163: 335–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Meijer, E.P.M., 2004. The breeding of Cannabis cultivars for pharmaceutical end-uses. In: G.W. Guy, B.A. Whittle & P.J. Robson (Eds.), The medicinal uses of Cannabis and cannabinoids, pp. 55–69. Pharmaceutical Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morimoto, S., K. Komatsu, F. Taura & Y. Shoyama, 1997. Enzymological evidence for cannabichromenic acid biosynthesis. J Nat Prod 60: 854–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morimoto, S., K. Komatsu, F. Taura & Y. Shoyama, 1998. Purification and characterization of cannabichromenic acid synthase from Cannabis sativa. Phytochemistry 49: 1525– 1529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shoyama, Y., H. Hirano & I. Nishioka, 1984. Biosynthesis of propyl cannabinoid acid and its biosynthetic relationship with pentyl and methyl cannabinoid acids. Phytochemistry 23: 1909– 1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Small, E. & D. Marcus, 2003. Tetrahydrocannabinol levels in hemp (Cannabis sativa) germplasm resources. Econ Bot 57: 545–558.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taura, F., S. Morimoto, Y. Shoyama & R. Mechoulam, 1995. First direct evidence for the mechanism of delta-1-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 38: 9766–9767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taura, F., S. Morimoto & Y. Shoyama, 1996. Purification and characterization of cannabidiolic-acid synthase from Cannabis sativa L. J Biol Chem 271: 17411–17416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Virovets, V.G., 1996. Selection for non-psychoactive hemp varieties (Cannabis sativa L.) in the CIS (former USSR). J Int Hemp Assoc 3: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vree, T.B., D.D. Breimer, C.A.M. van Ginneken & J.M. van Rossum, 1971. Identification of the methyl and propyl homologues of CBD, THC and CBN in hashish by a new method of combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Acta Pharm Suedica 8: 683–684.

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Zeeuw, R.A., J. Wijsbek, D.D. Breimer, T.B. Vree, C.A. Van Ginneken & J.M. van Rossum, 1972. Cannabinoids with a propyl side chain in Cannabis. Occurrence and chromatographic behaviour. Science 175: 778–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. P. M. de Meijer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Meijer, E.P.M., Hammond, K.M. The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. (II): Cannabigerol predominant plants. Euphytica 145, 189–198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-1164-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • cannabigerol
  • cannabinoids
  • Cannabis
  • chemotype
  • inheritance