Genetic diversity is the basis for successful crop improvement and can be estimated by different methods. The objectives of this study were to estimate the genetic diversity of 30 ancestral to modern hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars adapted to the Northern Great Plains using pedigree information, morphological traits (agronomic measurements from six environments), end-use quality traits (micro-quality assays on 50 g grain or milled flour samples for the six environments), and molecular markers (seed storage proteins separated using SDS-PAGE, 51 SSRs, and 23 SRAP DNA markers), and to determine the relationships of genetic distance estimates obtained from these methods. Relationships among diversity estimates were determined using simple (Pearson) and rank (Spearman) correlation coefficients between distance estimates and by clustering cultivars using genetic-distances for different traits. All methods found a wide range in genetic diversity. The genetic distance estimates based on pedigree had the highest values due to possible over-estimation arising from model assumptions. The genetic diversity estimates based on seed storage protein were lowest because they were the major determinants of end-use quality, which is a highly selected trait. In general, the diversity estimates from each of the methods were positively correlated at a low level with the exceptions of SRAP diversity estimates being independent of morphologic traits (simple correlation), SDS-PAGE, and SSR diversity estimates (rank correlation). However, SSR markers, thought to be among the most efficient markers for estimating genetic diversity, were most highly correlated with seed storage proteins. The procedures used to accurately estimate genetic diversity will depend largely upon the tools available to the researcher and their application to the breeding scheme.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
coefficient of diversity
coefficient of parentage
genotype by environment interaction
high molecular weight
low molecular weight
sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
simple sequence repeats
sequence-related amplified polymorphism
Almanza-Pinzon, M.I., M.L. Warburton, P.N. Fox & M. Khairallah, 2003. Comparison of molecular markers and coefficients of parentage for the analysis of genetic diversity among spring bread wheat accessions. Euphytica 130: 77–86.
Baenziger, P.S., D.R. Shelton, M.J. Shipman & R.A. Graybosch, 2001. Breeding for end-use quality: Reflections on the Nebraska experience. Euphytica 119: 95–100.
Barrett, B.A., K.K. Kidwell & P.N. Fox, 1998. Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity assessment methods using wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci 38: 1271–1278.
Beer, S.C., W. Siripoonwiwat, L.S.O. Donoughu, E. Souza, D. Mattews & M.E. Sorrells, 1997. Association between molecular markers and quantitative traits in oats germplasm pool: Can we infer linkage? http://www.cabi-publishing.org/jag/index.html.
Bohn, M., H.F. Utz & A.E. Melchinger, 1999. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci 39: 228–237.
Bryan, G.J., P. Stephenson, A.J. Collins, J. Kirby, J.B. Smith & M.D. Gale, 1997. Low levels of DNA sequence variation among adapted genotypes of hexaploid bread wheat. Theor Appl Gent 99: 192–198.
Cox, T.S., J.P. Murphy & D.M. Rodgers, 1985. Coefficient of parentages for 400 winter wheat cultivars. In: Agricultural Experiment Station. Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA.
Cox, T.S., J.P. Murphy & D.M. Rodgers, 1986. Changes in genetic diversity in the red winter wheat regions of the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 5583–5586.
Domini, P., J.R. Law, R.M.D. Koebner, J.C. Reeves & R.J. Cooke, 2000. Temporal trends in the diversity of UK wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100: 912–917
Engles, J.M.M., V.R. Rao, A.H.D. Brown & M.T. Jackson, 2002. Managing Plant Genetic Diversity, p. 487. CABI Publishing, UK.
FAO, 1998. The States of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, p. 510. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Fufa, H., P.S. Baenziger, B.S. Beecher, R.A. Graybosch, K.M. Eskridge & L A. Nelson, 2005. Genetic improvement trends in agronomic performances and end-use quality characteristics among hard red winter wheat cultivars in Nebraska. Euphytica (in press).
Graybosch, R.A., 1992. High molecular weight glutenin subunit composition of cultivars, germplasm and parents of U. S. red winter wheat. Crop Sci 32: 1151–1155
Graybosch, R.A. & R. Morris, 1990. An improved SDS-PAGE method for the analysis of wheat endosperm storage proteins. J Cereal Sci 11: 201–212.
Graybosch, R.A., J.-H. Lee, C.J. Peterson, D.R. Porter & O.K. Chung, 1999. Genetic, agronomic and quality comparisons of two 1AL.1RS wheat-rye chromosomal translocations. Plant Breed 118: 125–130.
Gupta, R.B. & K.W. Shepherd, 1990. Two-step one-dimensional SDS-PAGE analysis of LMW subunits of glutelin. 1. Variation and genetic control of the subunits in hexaploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet 80: 65–74.
Gupta, P.K., R.K. Varshney, P.C. Sharma & B. Ramesh, 1999. Molecular markers and their applications in wheat breeding. Plant Breed 118: 369–390.
Huang, X.Q., A. Borner, M.S. Roder & M.W. Ganal, 2002. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 105: 699–707.
Kuleung, C., P.S. Baenziger & I. Dweikat, 2004. Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye and triticale. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1147–1150.
Kempthorne, O., 1969. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Kim, H.S. & R.W. Ward, 1997. Genetic diversity in Eastern U.S. soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) based on RFLPs and coefficient of parentage. Theor Appl Genet 94: 472– 479.
Li, G. & C.F. Quiros, 2001. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a sample PCR reaction: Its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103: 455–461.
Manifesto, M.M., A.R. Schlatter, H.E. Hopp, E.Y. Suarez & J. Dubcovsky, 2001. Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers. Crop Sci 41: 682– 690.
May, O.L., D.T. Bowman & D.S. Calhoun, 1995. Genetic diversity of U.S upland cotton cultivars released between 1980 and 1990. Crop Sci 35: 1570–1574.
Murphy, J.P., T.S. Cox & D.M. Rodgers, 1986. Cluster analysis of red winter wheat cultivars based upon coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci 26: 672–676.
Nei, M. & W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 5269–5273.
Payne, P.I., 1987. Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variation on bread-making quality. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 38: 141–153.
Payne, P.I. & G.J. Lawrence, 1983. Catalogue of alleles for the complex loci, Glu-A1, Glu-B1, and Glu-D1, which code for high-molecular-weight subunits of glutenin in hexaploid wheat. Cereal Res Commun 11: 29–35.
Plaschke, J., M.W. Ganal & M.S. Roder, 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 91: 1001–1007.
Powell, W., M. Morgante, C. Andree, M. Hanafey, J. Vogel, S. Tingery & A. Rafalski, 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2: 225–238.
Prasad, M., R.K. Varshney, J K. Roy & H.S. Balyan, 2000. The use of microsatellites for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100: 584–592.
Roder, M.S., V. Korzun, K. Wendehake, J. Plaschke, M. Tixier, P. Lorey & M.W. Ganal, 1998. A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149: 2007–2023.
Roldan-Ruiz, I., F.A. Van Eeuwijk, T.J. Gilliland, P. Dubreuil, C. Dillmann, J. Lallemand, M. DeLoose & C.P. Baril, 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor Appl Genet 103: 1138–1150.
Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, v. 2.202k. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.
Saghai-Maroof, M.A., K.M. Soliman, R.A. Jorgensen & R.W. Allard, 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018.
SAS Institute Inc, 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn., Vols. 1 and 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Sneath, P.H.A. & R.R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practices of Classification. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Souza, E. & M.E. Sorrells, 1989. Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci 29: 595–601.
Sun, Q., Z. Ni, Z. Liu, J. Gao & T. Haung, 1998. Genetic relationships and diversity among Tibetan wheat, common wheat and European spelt wheat revealed by RAPD markers. Euphytica 99: 205–211.
Tatham, A.S. & P.R. Shewry, 1995. The S-poor prolamins of wheat, barley and rye. J Cereal Sci 22: 1–16.
Tinker, N.A. & D.E. Mather, 1993. Software for computing kinship coefficients. Heredity 84: 238.
U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative, 2003. Preliminary BARC SSR maps and primer pair. http://www.scabusa.org/pdfs/BARC-SSR.html.
van Beuningen, L.T. & R.H. Busch. 1997a. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: I. Analysis of the coefficients of parentage matrix. Crop Sci 37: 570–579.
van Beuningen, L.T. & R.H. Busch, 1997b. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: III. Cluster analysis based on quantitative morphological traits. Crop Sci 37: 981– 988.
Weir, B.S., 1996. Genetic Analysis. II. Sinauer Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.
About this article
Cite this article
Fufa, H., Baenziger, P.S., Beecher, B. et al. Comparison of phenotypic and molecular marker-based classifications of hard red winter wheat cultivars. Euphytica 145, 133–146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-0626-3