Advertisement

Religiosity, Secularity and Fertility in Canada

  • Maryam Dilmaghani
Article

Abstract

Using several cycles of the Canadian General Social Survey covering cohorts born from the early 1900s onwards, this paper examines how religiosity and secularity associate with fertility in Canada. The analysis shows that among multiple dimensions of religiosity, religious attendance is the strongest predictor of higher fertility in the country. For the latest cycle conducted in 2011, three mutually exclusive groups of secularized women are compared with the actively religious in their fertility behaviour and intentions. All these secularized women are found to have lower fertility rates compared with the actively religious. Among them, the strictly seculars, a proxy identifier for the atheists, have the lowest fertility and the highest likelihood of remaining childless. Various implications are discussed.

Keywords

Fertility Religiosity Secularity Canada 

Supplementary material

10680_2018_9487_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (144 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 295 kb)

References

  1. Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., Aupers, S., Koster, W. D., Mascini, P., & Waal, J. V. D. (2009). A Christian cancellation of the secularist truce? Waning Christian religiosity and waxing religious deprivatization in the West. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adsera, A. (2006a). Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies, 60(2), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adsera, A. (2006b). Religion and changes in family-size norms in developed countries. Review of Religious Research, 47(3), 271–286.Google Scholar
  4. Adsera, A. (2011). Where are the babies? Labor market conditions and fertility in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adsera, A., & Ferrer, A. (2016). The fertility of married immigrant women to Canada. International Migration Review, 50(2), 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ammerman, N. T., & Roof, W. C. (2014). Work, family and religion in contemporary society: Remaking our lives. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Argue, A., Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (1999). Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(3), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahr, H. M. (1970). Aging and religious disaffiliation. Social Forces, 49(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Atheism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. Baker, J. O. B., & Smith, B. (2009). None too simple: Examining issues of religious nonbelief and nonbelonging in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balakrishnan, T. R., & Chen, J. (1990). Religiosity, nuptiality and reproduction in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 27(3), 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Balakrishnan, T. R., Kantner, J. F., & Allingham, J. D. (1975). Fertility and family planning in a Canadian metropolis. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barrett, D. B., Kurian, G. T., & Johnson, T. M. (2000). World Christian encyclopedia (Vol. 3). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Becker, P. E., & Hofmeister, H. (2001). Work, family, and religious involvement for men and women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berghammer, C. (2012a). Family life trajectories and religiosity in Austria. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berghammer, C. (2012b). Church attendance and childbearing: Evidence from a Dutch panel study, 1987–2005. Population Studies, 66(2), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berman, E., Iannaccone, L. R., & Ragusa, G. (2012). From empty pews to empty cradles: Fertility decline among European Catholics (No. 18350). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  19. Bibby, R. (2007). Nevers, nones, and nots. http://001a339.netsolhost.com/images/NNNpaper07.pdf.
  20. Bibby, R. W. (2011). Continuing the conversation on Canada: changing patterns of religious service attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(4), 831–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bibby, R., Meunier, M., & Mager, R. (2007). Religion à la carte in Québec: A problem of demand, supply, or both. Prepared for a special issue on religion in Québec in Globe, ed. Robert Mager and Martin Meunier, pp. 151–179.Google Scholar
  22. Billari, F. C., Liefbroer, A. C., & Philipov, D. (2006). The postponement of childbearing in Europe: Driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Borooah, V. (2004). The politics of demography: A study of inter-community fertility differences in India. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(3), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brenner, P. S. (2011). Identity importance and the overreporting of religious service attendance: Multiple imputation of religious attendance using the American Time Use Study and the General Social Survey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brenner, P. S. (2012). Identity as a determinant of the overreporting of church attendance in Canada. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(2), 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  27. Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West (Vol. 3). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Bumpass, L. L. (1987). The risk of an unwanted birth: The changing context of contraceptive sterilization in the US. Population Studies, 41(3), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children and family contexts in the United States. Population studies, 54(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Burch, T. K. (1966). The fertility of North American Catholics: A comparative overview. Demography, 3(1), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Burr, W. R., Marks, L. D., & Day, R. D. (2011). Sacred matters: Religion and spirituality in families. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Chatters, L. M., & Taylor, R. J. (2005). Religion and families. Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 517–541). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Chatters, L. M., Taylor, R. J., Lincoln, K. D., & Schroepfer, T. (2002). Patterns of informal support from family and church members among African Americans. Journal of Black Studies, 33(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cochran, J. K., Chamlin, M. B., Beeghley, L., & Fenwick, M. (2004). Religion, religiosity, and nonmarital sexual conduct: An application of reference group theory. Sociological Inquiry, 74(1), 70–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cragun, R. T., Kosmin, B., Keysar, A., Hammer, J. H., & Nielsen, M. (2012). On the receiving end: Discrimination toward the non-religious in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Curtis-White, K. J. (2002). Declining fertility among North American Hutterites: The use of birth control within a Dariusleut colony. Social Biology, 49(1–2), 58–73.Google Scholar
  37. Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Davie, G. (2002). Europe: the exceptional case: Parameters of faith in the modern world. London: Darton Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
  39. Davie, G. (2007). Vicarious religion: A methodological challenge. In N. T. Ammerman (Ed.), Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives (pp. 21–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Davie, G. (2008). From believing without belonging to vicarious religion. In D. V. A. Olson & D. Pollack (Eds.), The Role of Religion in Modern Societies (pp. 165–168).Google Scholar
  41. De Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1987). Gender differences in religion: A test of the structural location theory. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dilmaghani, M. (2017a). Civic participation of secular groups in Canada. Review of Social Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2017.1299203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dilmaghani, M. (2017b). Religiosity and labour earnings in Canadian provinces. Journal of Labor Research, 38(1), 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dilmaghani, M. (2017c). Exploring the relationship between secularity and marital behavior. Marriage & Family Review.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1403989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dilmaghani, M. (2017d). Religious identity and real estate wealth accumulation: Evidence from Canada. Housing Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1364714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dobbelaere, K. (1999). Towards an integrated perspective of the processes related to the descriptive concept of secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dobbelaere, K. (2000). Secularization. In W. H. Swatos & D. V. A. Olson (Eds.), The secularization debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Eagle, D. E. (2011). Changing patterns of attendance at religious services in Canada, 1986–2008. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(1), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Edgell, P., Frost, J., & Stewart, E. (2017). From existential to social understandings of risk: Examining gender differences in nonreligion. Social Currents, 4(6), 556–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Edgell, P., Hartmann, D., Stewart, E., & Gerteis, J. (2016). Atheists and other cultural outsiders: Moral boundaries and the non-religious in the United States. Social Forces, 95(2), 607–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population, 24(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gauvreau, M. (2005). Catholic origins of Quebec’s quiet revolution, 1931–1970 (Vol. 2). Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.Google Scholar
  54. Gauvreau, D., & Laplante, B. (2016). La fécondité au Canada durant le baby-boom. Divergence et convergence des comportements. In Annales de démographie historique (No. 2, pp. 65–110). Belin.Google Scholar
  55. Gervais, W. M. (2011). Finding the faithless: Perceived atheist prevalence reduces anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goldscheider, C. (2006). Religion, family, and fertility: What do we know historically and comparatively? (pp. 41–57). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Goldscheider, C., & Mosher, W. D. (1991). Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: The importance of religious factors. Studies in Family Planning, 22(2), 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Greeley, A. M. (2002). Religious revivals in Eastern Europe. Society, 39(2), 76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Grim, B. J., & Finke, R. (2007). Religious persecution in cross-national context: Clashing civilizations or regulated religious economies? American Sociological Review, 72(4), 633–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Guetto, R., Luijkx, R., & Scherer, S. (2015). Religiosity, gender attitudes and women’s labour market participation and fertility decisions in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 58(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Haan, M. D. (2005). Studying the impact of religion on fertility in nineteenth-century Canada. Social Science History, 29(03), 373–411.Google Scholar
  63. Hackett, C., Grim, B., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potančoková, M., & Abel, G. (2012). The global religious landscape. In Pew Research center’s forum on religion & public life. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  64. Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B. J., & Skirbekk, V. (2015). The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic research, 32(27), 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Harknett, K., & Hartnett, C. S. (2014). The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries, 2004–07. Population Studies, 68(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hay, D. A. (2014). An investigation into the swiftness and intensity of recent secularization in Canada: Was Berger right? Sociology of Religion, 75(1), 136–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Henripin, J. (1972). Trends and factors of fertility in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  68. Henripin, J., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (1974). La fin de la revanche des berceaux: qu’en pensent les Québécoises? (Vol. 2). Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  69. Hertel, B. R., & Hughes, M. (1987). Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for “pro-family” issues in the United States. Social Forces, 65(3), 858–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hout, M. (2003). Demographic methods for the sociology of religion. In M. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2014). Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987–2012. Sociological Science, 1(9), 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hout, M., & Greeley, A. M. (1987). The center doesn’t hold: Church attendance in the United States, 1940–1984. American Sociological Review, 325–345.Google Scholar
  74. Hout, M., Greeley, A., & Wilde, M. J. (2001). The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 468–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Impicciatore, R., & Billari, F. C. (2012). Secularization, union formation practices, and marital stability: Evidence from Italy. European Journal of Population, 28(2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Krause, N., & Morgan, D. (2002). Religious trajectories and transitions over the life course. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 55(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Iqbal, M., Richards, J., Noble, R., Weitzman, G., Washofsky, M., Aderibigbe, T., et al. (2009). Faith and fertility: Attitudes towards reproductive practices in different religions from ancient to modern times. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  78. Johnson, T. M., & Grim, B. J. (2013). The world’s religions in figures: An introduction to international religious demography. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth?: Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  80. Kaufmann, E., Goujon, A., & Skirbekk, V. (2012). The end of secularization in Europe?: A socio-demographic perspective. Sociology of Religion, 73(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Krause, N., Ellison, C. G., Shaw, B. A., Marcum, J. P., & Boardman, J. D. (2001). Church-based social support and religious coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 637–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Laing, L. M. (1980). Declining fertility in a religious isolate: the Hutterite population of Alberta, Canada, 1951–1971. Human Biology, 52, 289–310.Google Scholar
  83. Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., & Lussier, M. H. (2003). De la forte fécondité à la fécondité désirée. La démographie québécoise: enjeux du XXIe siècle (pp. 66–109). Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  84. Lehrer, E. L. (2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 707–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lehrer, E. L., & Chiswick, C. U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography, 30(3), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lim, C., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Murray-Swank, A., & Murray-Swank, N. (2003). Religion and the sanctification of family relationships. Review of Religious Research, 44(3), 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Marchisio, R., & Pisati, M. (1999). Belonging without believing: Catholics in contemporary Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 4(2), 236–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Martin, D. (1978). A general theory of secularization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  92. Martin, D. (2005). On secularization. Towards a revised general theory. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  93. McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., Szalma, I., Donno, A., & Tanturri, M. L. (2015). Increasing childlessness in Europe: Time trends and country differences. Families and Societies. Working Paper Series, 3. http://www.familiesandsocieties.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/WP33MiettinenEtAl2015.pdf.
  95. Mikołajczak, M., & Pietrzak, J. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and religion: Connected through values. Sex Roles, 70(9–10), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Miller, W. B., & Pasta, D. J. (1995). Behavioral intentions: Which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 530–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107(6), 1399–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B., & Johnson, D. P. (1992). Religion and fertility in the United States: New patterns. Demography, 29(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. O’Gráda, C., & Walsh, B. (1995). Fertility and population in Ireland, North and South. Population Studies, 49(2), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Peek, C. W., Lowe, G. D., & Williams, L. S. (1991). Gender and God’s word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces, 69(4), 1205–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Peri-Rotem, N. (2016). Religion and fertility in Western Europe: Trends across cohorts in Britain, France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population, 32(2), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Philipov, D., & Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: a comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 5, 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Putnam, R. D., Lim, C., & MacGregor, C. A. (2010). Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Régnier-Loilier, A., & Prioux, F. (2008). Does religious practice influence family behaviours? Population & Societies, 447, 1–4.Google Scholar
  106. Reimer, S. (2017). Conservative Protestants and religious polarization in Canada. Studies in Religion, 46(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ribberink, E., Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2013). Deprivatization of disbelief?: Non-religiosity and anti-religiosity in 14 Western European Countries. Politics and Religion, 6(01), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Swicegood, G. (1988). First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood (Vol. 2). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sander, W. (1992). Catholicism and the economics of fertility. Population Studies, 46(3), 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sander, W. (2002). Religion and human capital. Economics Letters, 75(3), 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Scheitle, C. P., Kane, J. B., & Hook, J. V. (2011). Demographic imperatives and religious markets: Considering the individual and interactive roles of fertility and switching in group growth. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(3), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sherkat, D. E. (2000). “That they be keepers of the home”: The effect of conservative religion on early and late transitions into housewifery. Review of Religious Research, 41(3), 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sherkat, D. E. (2001). Tracking the restructuring of American religion: Religious affiliation and patterns of religious mobility, 1973–1998. Social Forces, 79(4), 1459–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sherkat, D. E. (2008). Beyond belief: Atheism, agnosticism, and theistic certainty in the United States. Sociological Spectrum, 28(5), 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Skirbekk, V., Kaufmann, E., & Goujon, A. (2010). Secularism, fundamentalism, or Catholicism? The religious composition of the United States to 2043. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(2), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Smith, C. (2008). Future directions in the sociology of religion. Social Forces, 86(4), 1561–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Stark, R. (1996). The rise of christianity: A sociologist reconsiders history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Stark, R., & Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). A supply-side reinterpretation of the “secularization” of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33(3), 230–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Statistics Canada. (2005). Population projections of visible minority groups, Canada, provinces and regions 2001–2017 Demography Division Catalogue no. 91-541-XIE. www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/91-541-XIE/91-541-XIE2005001.pdf.
  123. Statistics Canada. (2017). The general social survey: An overview. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89f0115x/89f0115x2013001-eng.htm.
  124. Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Kaufmann, E., & Goujon, A. (2015). The end of secularisation through demography? Projections of Spanish religiosity. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Storm, I., & Voas, D. (2012). The Intergenerational transmission of religious service attendance. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 25(2), 19–38.Google Scholar
  127. Stover, R. G., & Hope, C. A. (1984). Monotheism and gender status: A cross-societal study. Social Forces, 63(2), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research, 3, 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Thiessen, J. (2012). Marginal religious affiliates in Canada: Little reason to expect increased church involvement. Canadian Review of Sociology, 49(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34(3), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Thomson, E., McDonald, E., & Bumpass, L. L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography, 27(4), 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Trent, K., & Crowder, K. (1997). Adolescent birth intentions, social disadvantage, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Trovato, F. (1986). The relationship between marital dissolution and suicide: The Canadian case. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48(2), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Van Tubergen, F. (2006). Religious affiliation and attendance among immigrants in eight western countries: Individual and contextual effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Van Tubergen, F. (2007). Religious affiliation and participation among immigrants in a secular society: A study of immigrants in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(5), 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Vernon, G. M. (1968). The religious “nones”: A neglected category. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 7(2), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Voas, D. (2003). Intermarriage and the demography of secularization. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Voas, D. (2009). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Waite, L. J., & Lehrer, E. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29(2), 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Walter, T., & Davie, G. (1998). The religiosity of women in the modern West. British Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 640–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Westoff, C. F., & Ryder, N. B. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography, 14(4), 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wilkins-Laflamme, S. (2014). Toward religious polarization? Time effects on religious commitment in US, UK, and Canadian regions. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 284–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wilkins-Laflamme, S. (2015). How unreligious are the “religious nones” religious? Dynamics of the unaffiliated in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 40(4), 477–500.Google Scholar
  144. Wilkins-Laflamme, S. (2016). Secularization and the wider gap in values and personal religiosity between the religious and nonreligious. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wilkins-Laflamme, S. (2017). Religious-secular polarization compared: The cases of Quebec and British Columbia. Studies in Religion, 46(2), 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86(3), 1311–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zubrzycki, G. (2016). Beheading the Saint: Nationalism, religion, and secularism in Quebec. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSaint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations