The Effect of Population Growth on the Environment: Evidence from European Regions

  • Hannes WeberEmail author
  • Jennifer Dabbs Sciubba


There is a long-standing dispute on the extent to which population growth causes environmental degradation. Most studies on this link have so far analyzed cross-country data, finding contradictory results. However, these country-level analyses suffer from the high level of dissimilarity between world regions and strong collinearity of population growth, income, and other factors. We argue that regional-level analyses can provide more robust evidence, isolating the population effect from national particularities such as policies or culture. We compile a dataset of 1062 regions within 22 European countries and analyze the effect from population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use change between 1990 and 2006. Data are analyzed using panel regressions, spatial econometric models, and propensity score matching where regions with high population growth are matched to otherwise highly similar regions exhibiting significantly less growth. We find a considerable effect from regional population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use increase in Western Europe. By contrast, in the new member states in the East, other factors appear more important.


Population growth CO2 emissions Land use NUTS-3 regions 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. An, L., Lindermann, M., Qi, J., Shortdridge, A., & Liu, J. (2005). Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus, I., & Butler, S. (2011). Too many people? Population, immigration, and the environmental crisis. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.Google Scholar
  3. Basten, S., Huinink, J., & Klüsener, S. (2012). Spatial variation of sub-national fertility trends in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies, 36(2–3), 615–660.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S12–S37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benfield, K. (2011). How Hamburg became Europe’s Greenest City. Citylab. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Bijak, J., Kupiszewska, D., Kupiszewski, M., Saczuk, K., & Kicinger, A. (2007). Population and labour force projections for 27 European countries, 2002–2052: Impact of international migration on population ageing. European Journal of Population, 23, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bivand, R., & Piras, G. (2015). Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Software, 63(18), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend. A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change. Santa Monica: RAND.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (1992). Population growth and global warming. Population and Development Review, 18(2), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bookchin, M. (1996). Which way for the ecology movement?. San Francisco, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boserup, E. (1965). The condition of agricultural growth. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell, J. C. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2(3/4), 312–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson, R. T. (2010). The environmental Kuznets curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Catalán, B., Saurí, D., & Serra, P. (2008). Urban sprawl in the Mediterranean? Patterns of growth and change in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region 1993–2000. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(3), 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. City of Aarhus (2016). Aarhus CO2 neutral in 2030. Cited 1 April 2016.
  16. Conca, K., Princen, T., & Maniates, M. F. (2002). Confronting consumption. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coole, D. (2013). Too many bodies? The return and disavowal of the population question. Environmental Politics, 22(2), 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Couch, C., Karecha, J., Nuissl, H., & Rink, D. (2005). Decline and sprawl: An evolving type of urban development–observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. European Planning Studies, 13(1), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cramer, J. (2002). Population growth and local air pollution: Methods, models, and results. Population and Development Review, 28(Supplement), 22–52.Google Scholar
  20. De Ridder, K., Lefebre, F., Adriaensen, A., Arnold, U., Beckroege, W., Bronner, C., et al. (2008). Simulating the impact of urban sprawl on air quality and population exposure in the German Ruhr area. Part II: Development and evaluation of an urban growth scenario. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 7070–7077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Sherbinin, A., Carr, D., Cassels, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). Population and Environment. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dublin City Council. (2016). Dublin City development plan 2016–2022 written statement (Vol. 1). Dublin: Dublin City Council.Google Scholar
  24. Dyson, T. (2010). Population and development: The demographic Transition. London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  25. Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  26. Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2006. Count Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (1995). Eurobarometer 44.0. INRA, Brussels. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA2689 Data file Version 1.0.1.
  28. European Commission (2009). Environment: Stockholm and Hamburg win first European Green Capital awards. Brussels, European Commission 23 Feb.Google Scholar
  29. European Commission. (2011). Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe, Communication COM (2011) 571 of 20 September 2011. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  30. European Commission. (2015). The 2015 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  31. European Environmental Agency. (2007). CLC2006 technical guidelines. EEA Technical report No 17/ 2007. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  32. European Spatial Planning Observation Network (2012). Corine land cover, third level of the nomenclature (CLC_AGG3). Cited 9 March 2015.
  33. European Spatial Planning Observation Network (2014). CO2 emissions from ground transport. Cited 11 March 2015.
  34. Eurostat (2015a). Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanaggr3). Cited 17 March 2015.
  35. Eurostat (2015b). Gross domestic product (GDP) at current market prices by NUTS 3 regions (nama_r_e3gdp). Cited 13 March 2015.
  36. Gorrenflo, L. J., Corson, C., Chomitz, K. M., Harper, G., Honzák, M., & Özler, B. (2011). Exploring the association between people and deforestation in Madagascar. In R. P. Cincotta & L. J. Gorenflo (Eds.), Human population: Its influences on biological diversity. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Granger, C. W., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Höhn, C., Avramov, D., & Kotowska, I. E. (Eds.). (2008). People, Population Change and Policies. Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study: Demographic knowledge—gender—ageing. Data CD-ROM (Vol. 2). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Holdren, J. P., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Human population and the global environment: Population growth, rising per capita material consumption, and disruptive technologies have made civilization a global ecological force. American Scientist, 62(3), 282–292.Google Scholar
  41. Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang, P. (2012). Over-breeders and the population bomb. the reemergence of nativism and population control in anti-immigration policies. In L. Mazur (Ed.), A pivotal moment. Population, justice, and the environmental challenge. Washington, D.C./Covelo (CA): Island Press.Google Scholar
  43. Huang, B., Zhang, L., & Wu, B. (2009). Spatiotemporal analysis of rural–urban land conversion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(3), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hummel, D., Adamo, S., de Sherbinin, A., Murphy, L., Aggarwal, R., Zulu, L., et al. (2013). Inter-and transdisciplinary approaches to population–environment research for sustainability aims: A review and appraisal. Population and Environment, 34(4), 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 205–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. LeSage, P., & Pace, R. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. London/New York: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liddle, B. (2013). Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: evidence from panel cointegration modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 40, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liddle, B. (2014). Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses. Population and Environment, 35(3), 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lutz, W., & Qiang, R. (2002). Determinants of human population growth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 357(1425), 1197–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lutz, W., Scherbov, S., Prskawetz, A., Dworak, M., & Feichtinger, G. (2002). Population, natural resources, and food security: Lessons from comparing full and reduced-form models. Population and Development Review, 28, 199–224.Google Scholar
  51. MacKellar, F. L., Lutz, W., Prinz, C., & Goujon, A. (1995). Population, households, and CO2 emissions. Population and Development Review, 21(4), 849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayda, A. M. (2010). International migration: A panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. Journal of Population Economics, 23, 1249–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mazur, L. (2012). Introduction. In L. Mazur (Ed.), A pivotal moment. Population, justice, and the environmental challenge. Washington, D.C./Covelo (CA): Island Press.Google Scholar
  54. O’Neill, B. C., Dalton, M., Fuchs, R., Jiang, L., Pachauri, S., & Zigova, K. (2010). Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17521–17526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Neill, B. C., Liddle, B., Jiang, L., Smith, K. R., Pachauri, S., Dalton, M., et al. (2012). Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions. The Lancet, 380(9837), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Palomba, R., Menniti, A., & Mussino, A. (1998). Attitudes towards demographic trends and policy. European Journal of Population, 4, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., Henderson, J. V., & Epple, D. (2009). Urban sprawl in Europe. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (pp. 125–149).Google Scholar
  58. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Cited 30 September 2013.
  59. Rasmussen, U.V. & Christensen, A.M.H. (2010). Danish EcoCities: Six cutting-edge climate and energy cities. In 2010 aceee summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. Cited 1 April 2016.
  60. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Satterthwaite, D. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schrodt, P. A. (2014). Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schulp, C. J., Nabuurs, G. J., & Verburg, P. H. (2008). Future carbon sequestration in Europe—effects of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 127(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schultz, T. P. (1993). Returns to women’s education. In E. M. King & M. A. Hill (Eds.), Women’s education in developing countries: Barriers, benefits, and policies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (for the World Bank).Google Scholar
  65. Schumpeter, J. A. (1994 [1954]). History of economic analysis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., & Reilly, M. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shi, A. (2003). The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecological Economics, 44(1): 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Siedentop, S., & Fina, S. (2012). Who sprawls most? Exploring the patterns of urban growth across 26 European countries. Environment and Planning A, 44(11), 2765–2784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simon, J. L. (1993). Economic thought about population consequences: Some reflections. Journal of Population Economics, 6(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simon, J. L. (1994). More people, greater wealth, more resources, healthier environment. Economic Affairs, 14(3), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spengler, J. J. (1998). History of population theories. In: Simon, J. L. (Ed.) The economics of population: Classic writings (pp. 3–15). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  72. Teitelbaum, M. S., & Winter, L. M. (1985). The fear of population decline. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. United Nations (2015). World Population Projections. The 2015 Revision. Volume I: Comprehensive Tables. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  74. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Spatial regression models. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. York, R., & McGee, J. A. (2016). Understanding the Jevons Paradox. Environmental. Sociology, 2(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
  77. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhu, Q., & Peng, X. (2012). The impacts of population change on carbon emissions in China during 1978–2008. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 36, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Department of International StudiesRhodes CollegeMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations