Do Japanese and Italian Women Live Longer than Women in Scandinavia?
- 84 Downloads
Life expectancies at birth are routinely computed from period life tables. When mortality is falling, such period life expectancies will typically underestimate real life expectancies, that is, life expectancies for birth cohorts. Hence, it becomes problematic to compare period life expectancies between countries when they have different historical mortality developments. For instance, life expectancies for countries in which the longevity improved early (like Norway and Sweden) are difficult to compare with those in countries where it improved later (like Italy and Japan). To get a fair comparison between the countries, one should consider cohort data. Since cohort life expectancies can only be computed for cohorts that were born more than a hundred years ago, in this paper we suggest that for younger cohorts one may consider the expected number of years lost up to a given age. Contrary to the results based on period data, our cohort results then indicate that Italian women may expect to lose more years than women in Norway and Sweden, while there are no indications that Japanese women will lose fewer years than women in Scandinavia. The large differences seen for period data may just be an artefact due to the distortion that period life tables imply in times of changing mortality.
KeywordsCohort data Expected number of years lost Life expectancy Life tables Period data
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Barbi, E., Bongaarts, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2008). How long do we live? Demographic models and reflections on tempo effects. Demographic research monographs 5. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Barker, D. (1994). Mothers, babies and disease in later life. London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Christensen, K. (2007). Early life events and later life health: Twin and famine studies. In T. Bengtsson (Ed.), Perspectives on mortality forecasting. V. Cohort factors: How conditions in early life influence mortality in later life (pp. 31–39)., Social Insurance Studies no. 5 Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency.Google Scholar
- Dinkel, R. H. (1984). Sterblichkeit in Perioden-und Kohortenbetrachtung. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 10, 477–500.Google Scholar
- Forsdahl, A. (1977). Are poor living conditions in childhood and adolescence an important risk factor for arteriosclerotic heart disease? British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 31, 91–95.Google Scholar
- Frenk, J., Bobadilla, J. L., Stern, C., Frejka, T., & Lozano, R. (1991). Elements for a theory of the health transition. Health Transition Review, 1, 21–38.Google Scholar
- Mamelund, S.-E., & Borgan, J.-K. (1996). Kohort-og periodedødelighet i Norge 1846–1994 (“Cohort and period mortality in Norway 1846–1994”). Report nr. 96/9. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
- Omran, A. R. (1971). The epidemiologic transition: A theory of the epidemiology of population change. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 49, 509–538. Reprinted 2005, The Milbank Quarterly, 83, 731–757.Google Scholar
- Rowland, D. (2003). Demographic methods and concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vallin, J., & Meslé, F. (2004). Convergences and divergences in mortality: A new approach to health transition. Demographic Research (Special Collection S2, Article 2), 11–44.Google Scholar