Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 575–597 | Cite as

Who Delays Childbearing? The Associations Between Time to First Birth, Personality Traits and Education

  • Lara Patrício Tavares
Article

Abstract

Using data from a large-scale survey, the British Household Panel Survey, this paper assesses the influence of personality traits on the timing of first childbirth and investigates whether, and in what way, personality traits explain the differences in maternity timing across educational groups. We estimate a log-logistic model of the time to first childbirth and show that there is a statistically significant relationship between the Big Five personality traits and the timing of motherhood. The results also show that highly qualified women who are ‘open-minded’ have the lowest hazards of childbirth, lower than similar less educated counterparts.

Keywords

Reproductive behaviour Fertility determinants Delayed childbearing Personality Big Five Educational status 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under Grant SFRH/BD/18356/2004 and ERC under Grant StG-201194. My thanks go also to John Ermisch, Emilia Del Bono, Francesco Billari, Arnstein Aassve, Maria Iacovou, Joshua Goldstein, João Bilhim, Luís Baptista, Francesca Zantomio, Priscila Ferreira and Chiara Pronzato.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behaviour (2nd ed.). Milton-Keynes: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Kimmel, J. (2006). The family earnings and postponement of maternity in the United States. In S. Gustfasson & A. Kalwij (Eds.), Education and postponement of maternity. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhrolcháin, M. N., & Beaujouan, E. (2012). Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 66(3), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billari, F. C. (2006). The transition to parenthood in European societies. Population Studies, 49, 63–116. Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Billari, F. C., & Philipov, D. (2001). Education and transition to motherhood: A comparative analysis of Western Europe. European Demographic Research Papers , 3, 1–40.Google Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boislard, M.-A. P., & Poulin, F. (2011). Individual, familial, friends-related and contextual predictors of early sexual intercourse. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cigno, A., & Ermisch, J. (1989). A microeconomic analysis of the timing of births. European Economic Review, 33(4), 737–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R., Gould, W., & Marchenko, Y. (2008). An introduction to survival analysis using STATA (2nd ed.). College Station, Texas: STATA Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, D. (2007). The road to low fertility. Aging Horizons, 7, 7–15.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, M. L., Wood, P. K., Orcutt, H. K., & Albino, A. (2003). Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Creighton, S. (2005). Adolescent gynaecology. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 15, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellwood, D., Wilde, T., & Batchelder, L. (2004). The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  19. Frejka, T., & Sardon, J.-P. (2006). First birth trends in developed countries: Persisting parenthood postponement. Demographic Research, 15, 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, D., Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the value of children. Demography, 31, 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustafsson, S. (2001). Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe, Journal of Population Economics, 14, 225–247.Google Scholar
  22. Gustafsson, S., & Kalwij, A. (2006). Education and postponement of maternity: Economic analyses for industrialized countries. European studies of population (vol. 15). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29, 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heineck, G., & Anger, S. (2008). The returns to cognitive abilities and personality traits in Germany. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research. p 124.Google Scholar
  25. Hobcraft, J. (2003). Reflections on demographic, evolutionary, and genetic approaches to the study of human reproductive behavior. In K. W. Wachter & R. A. Bulatao (Eds.), Offspring: Human fertility behavior in biodemographic perspective. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hobcraft, J. (2006). The ABC of demographic behaviour: How the interplays of alleles, brains, and contexts over the life course should shape research aimed at understanding population processes. Population Studies, 60(2), 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobcraft, J., & Kiernan, K. (1995). Becoming a parent in Europe. In European Association for population studies/international union for the scientific study of population, evolution or revolution in European population Vol. I, plenary sessions, European population conference. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  28. Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1556–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Johns, S. E., Dickins, T. E., & Clegg, H. T. (2011). Teenage pregnancy and motherhood: How might evolutionary theory inform policy? Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jokela, M., Alvergne, A., Pollet, T. V., & Lummaa, V. (2011). Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor model. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiernan, K. E. (1986). Teenage marriage and marital breakdown: A longitudinal study. Population Studies, 40(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behaviour in our genes? Findings from a Danish twins study. Population and Development Review, 25, 253–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (2002). Between nurture and nature: The shifting determinants of female fertility in Danish twin cohorts. Social Biology, 49, 218–248.Google Scholar
  36. Langston, C. A., & Sykes, E. W. (1997). Beliefs and the Big Five: Cognitive bases of broad individual differences in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 1, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leridon, H. (2004). Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment, Human Reproduction, 19, 1548–1553.Google Scholar
  38. Liefbroer, A. C. (2005). The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: Evidence from a panel study. European Journal of Population, 21, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loehlin, J. C. (2005). Resemblance in personality and attitudes between parents and their children: Genetic and environmental contributions. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family, background and economic success. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lundberg, S. (2012). Personality and marital surplus. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 1, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, S. P. (2000). Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30. Demography, 37, 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, W. B. (1992). Personality traits and developmental experiences as antecedents of childbearing motivation. Demography, 29, 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, A. (2010). The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1071–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D., Zimmerman, R. S., Logan, T. K., Leukefeld, C., & Clayton, R. (2004). The utility of the Five Factor model in understanding risky sexual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1611–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morgan, S. P., & Taylor, M. G. (2006). Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nyhus, E. K., & Pons, E. (2005). The effects of personality on earnings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 363–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oates, G. L. (1997). Self-esteem enhancement through fertility? Socioeconomic prospects, gender, and mutual influence. American Sociological Review, 62, 965–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Office for National Statistics. (2015). Births by parents’ characteristics in England and Wales. http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsbyparentscharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2014.
  50. Phillips, S. D., & Imhoff, A. R. (1997). Women and career development: A decade of research. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pronzato, C. D. (2010). British household panel survey consolidated marital, cohabitation and fertility histories, 1991–2005. UK Data Archive.Google Scholar
  53. Retherford, R. D., & Sewell, W. H. (1989). How intelligence affects fertility. Intelligence, 13, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Offutt, K. (1996). Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989. Demography, 33, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodgers, J. L., Kohler, H.-P., Kyvik, K., & Christensen, K. (2001). Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: Findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography, 38, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodgers, J. L., Kohler, H.-P., McGue, M., Behrman, J. R., Petersen, I., Bingley, P., et al. (2008). Education and cognitive ability as direct, mediating, or spurious influences on female age at first birth: Behavior genetic models fit to Danish twin data. American Journal of Sociology, 114(Suppl.), S202–S232.Google Scholar
  58. Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 246–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shearer, D. L., Mulvihill, B. A., Klerman, L., Wallander, J. L., Hovinga, M. E., & Redden, D. T. (2002). Association of early childbearing and low cognitive ability. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(5), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sobotka, T. (2008). Does persistent low fertility threaten the future of European populations? In J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere & J. van Bavel (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st century: A state of the art in demography (ch. 2). Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
  61. Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stormer, S., & Fahr, R. (2010). Individual determinants of work attendance: Evidence on the role of personality. IZA Discussion Paper, 4927.Google Scholar
  63. Tanturri, M. L., & Mencarini, L. (2008). Childless or childfree? Paths to Voluntary Childlessness in Italy, Population and Development Review, 34(1), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Testa, M. R., & Toulemont, L. (2006). Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcomes. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2006, 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas, F., Renaud, F., Benefice, E., Meeus, T., & Guegan, J.-F. (2001). International variability of ages at menarche and menopause: Patterns and main determinants. Human Biology, 73, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Udry, J. R. (1996). Biosocial models of low-fertility societies. Population and Development Review, 22 (Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories), 325–336.Google Scholar
  67. Van Bavel, J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition and family attitudes. Demography, 47, 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van de Kaa, D. J. (2004). Is the second demographic transition a useful research concept: Questions and answers. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2004, 4–10.Google Scholar
  69. Van der Zee, K., Thijs, M., & Schakel, L. (2002). The relationship of emotional intelligence with academic intelligence and the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 16, 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAPP, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e PolíticasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social DynamicsBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.CICS.NOVA, Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências SociaisUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations