Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 355–379 | Cite as

Work–Family Conflict Moderates the Relationship Between Childbearing and Subjective Well-Being

  • Anna MatysiakEmail author
  • Letizia Mencarini
  • Daniele Vignoli
Article

Abstract

Many empirical studies find that parents are not as happy as non-parents or that parenthood exerts a negative effect on subjective well-being (SWB). We add to these findings by arguing that there is a key moderating factor that has been overlooked in previous research, i.e. the level of work–family conflict. We hypothesize that the birth of a child means an increase in the level of work–family tension, which may be substantial for some parents and relatively weak for others. To outline such an approach, we estimate fixed-effects models using panel data from the Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia survey. We find that childbearing negatively affects SWB only when parents, mothers in particular, face a substantial work–family conflict, providing thus support for our hypothesis.

Keywords

Fertility Subjective well-being Work–family conflict 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors contributed to the paper equally and are listed alphabetically. Letizia Mencarini and Daniele Vignoli gratefully acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council under the European ERC Grant Agreement no StG-313617 (SWELL-FER: Subjective Well-being and Fertility, P. I. Letizia Mencarini). The collaboration with Anna Matysiak was supported by the European Research Council under the European ERC Grant Agreement no 284238 (EURREP: Fertility and Reproduction in the twenty-first Century, PI Tomáš Sobotka). We are grateful to Francesca Luppi for her help at the early stages of this project. This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either DSS or the Melbourne Institute.

References

  1. Aassve, A., Goisis, A., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Social Indicator Research, 108, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aassve, A., Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. (2015). Institutional change, happiness and fertility. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adhikari, P. (2006). Socio-economic indexes for areas: Introduction, Use and future directions. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1351.0.55.015Sep%202006?OpenDocument.
  4. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Baranowska, A. (2010). Family formation and subjective well-being. A literature overview. Working Papers, n. 5, ISID, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, J. (2013). Parents working out work (Australian family trends no. 1). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Baxter, J., Buchler, S., Perales, F., & Western, M. (2015). A life-changing event: First births and men’s and women’s attitudes to mothering and gender divisions of labour. Social Forces, 93(3), 989–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Begall, K., & Mills, M. (2011). The impact of subjective work control, job strain and work–family conflict on fertility intentions: a European comparison. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 27(4), 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billari, F. C. (2009). The happiness commonality: Fertility decisions in low fertility settings. Paper presented at Conference on How Generations and Gender Shape Demographic Change: Toward policies based on better knowledge, Geneva: UNECE, May 14–16, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. Billari, F. C., & Kohler, H.-P. (2009). Fertility and happiness in the XXI century: Institutions, preferences, and their interactions. Paper presented at the XXVI IUSSP International Population Conference in Marrakech, Morocco, 27 September–2 October, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Baranowska, A., & Matysiak, A. (2011). Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence from Poland. Vienna Yearbook, 9, 307–325.Google Scholar
  13. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–305). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cass, B. (2002). Employment time and family time: the intersection of labour market transformations and family responsibilities in Australia. In R. Callus & R. D. Lansbury (Eds.), Working futures: the changing nature of work and employment relations in Australia (pp. 142–174). Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (2002). A simple statistical model for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 1139–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa, P. T., Zonderman, A. B., McCrae, R. R., Cornonihuntley, J., Locke, B. Z., & Barbano, H. E. (1987). Longitudinal analyses of psychological well-being in a national sample—Stability of mean levels. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craig, L., Mullan, K., & Blaxland, M. (2010). Parenthood, policy and work–family time in Australia 1992–2006. Work, Employment & Society, 24(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Craig, L., & Siminski, P. (2010). Men’s housework, women’s housework and second births in Australia. Social Politics, 17(2), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Jeremy, H. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness, 4(2), 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Neve, J.-E., Christakis, N. A., Fowler, J. H., & Frey, B. S. (2012). Genes, economics, and happiness. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(4), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dykstra, P. A., & Keizer, R. (2009). The wellbeing of childless men and fathers in mid-life. Ageing and Society, 29(Special Issue 08), 1227–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Even, W. E. (1987). Career interruptions following childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics, 5(2), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110(446), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frijters, P., Johnston, D. V., & Shields, M. A. (2011). Life satisfaction dynamics with quarterly life event data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(1), 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.Google Scholar
  32. Hansen, T. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoffmann, L. W., & Hoffmann, M. L. (1973). The value of children to parents. In J. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population (pp. 19–76). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Joesch, J. M. (1994). Children and the timing of women’s paid work after childbirth: A further specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(2), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Keizer, R., Dykstra, P., & Poortman, A.-R. (2010). The transition to parenthood and well-being: The impact of partner status and work hour transitions. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Skytthe, A. (2005). Partner? Children = happiness? The effect of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 407–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: a review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lavee, Y., Sharlin, S., & Katz, R. (1996). The effect of parenting stress on marital quality: An integrated mother–father model. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Le Moglie, M., Mencarini, L., & Rapallini, C. (2015). Is it just a matter of personality? On the role of well-being in childbearing behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luppi, F. (2016). When is the second one coming? The effect of couple’s subjective well-being following the onset of parenthood. European Journal of Population. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9388-y.
  42. Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDonald, P. (2001). Family support policy in Australia: the need of a paradigm shift. People and Place, 9(2), 14–20.Google Scholar
  45. McDonald, P., & Moyle, H. (2010). Why English-speaking countries have relatively high fertility? Journal of Population Research, 27(4), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McLanahan, S., & Adams, J. (1987). Parenthood and psychological well-being. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 32, 689–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Misra, J., Budig, M., & Boeckmann, I. (2011). Work–family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community, Work and Family, 14(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Myrskylä, M., & Margolis, R. (2014). Happiness: Before and after the kids. Demography, 51(5), 1843–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nauck, B. (2000). The changing value of children—A special action theory of fertility behavior and intergenerational relationships in cross-cultural comparison. Paper presented at the seminar “Low fertility, families and public policies”, organised by the European Observatory on Family Matters in Sevilla, September 15–16, 2000.Google Scholar
  52. Nieuwenhuis, R., Need, A., & Van Der Kolk, H. (2012). Institutional and demographic explanations of women’s employment in 18 OECD Countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 614–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00965.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nomaguchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(2), 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pailhe, A., & Solaz, A. (2009). Work–family arrangements. In I. E. Kotowska, A. Matysiak, M. Styrc, A. Pailhe, A. Solaz, & D. Vignoli (Eds.), Family life and work. Analytical report on the Second quality of Life Survey (pp. 33–54). Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  55. Qian, Y., & Sayer, L. C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 383–400.Google Scholar
  56. Ranson, G. (1998). Education, work and family decision making: Finding the “right time to have a baby. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 35(4), 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D. K., Morgan, S. P., & Kravdal, Ø. (2010). Child-care availability and fertility in Norway. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodgers, J. L., Kohler, H.-P., Kyvik, K., & Christensen, K. (2001). Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: Findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography, 38(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11(6), 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheldon, K. M., & Lucas, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). Stability of happiness. Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  61. Skirbekk, V., & Blekesaune, M. (2014). Personality traits increasingly important for male fertility: evidence from Norway. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 521–529.Google Scholar
  62. Summerfield, M., Freidin, S., Hahn, M., Li, N., Macalalad, N., Mundy, L., et al. (2014). HILDA user manual—Release 13. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  63. Tavares, L. (2016). Who delays childbearing? The associations between time to first birth, personality traits and education. European Journal of Population. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9393-1.
  64. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work–family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, D. E., & Thompson, J. K. (1993). Biology and behavior: A set-point hypothesis of psychological functioning. Behavior Modification, 17, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zimmermann, A. C., & Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Matysiak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Letizia Mencarini
    • 2
  • Daniele Vignoli
    • 3
  1. 1.Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human CapitalVienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  2. 2.Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public PolicyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations