Gender Roles, Comparative Advantages and the Life Course: The Division of Domestic Labor in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples
- 1.7k Downloads
Lesbian and gay couples by definition cannot establish sex-specific divisions of domestic tasks, at least not literally. Previous research has shown that high levels of equality characterize domestic work arrangements in same-sex couples. This study scrutinizes explanations for this. The theoretical background stems from family economics, from the theory of relative resources and from gender role and life-course considerations. The empirical analysis is based upon the Generations and Gender Survey from Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Australia. Results show that same-sex partners engage in more tasks equally, that their housework-sharing pattern is less segregated and that the partners’ workload is more equally balanced. Comparative advantages, life-course differences and gender roles contribute to the explanation of higher levels of equality in same-sex compared to different-sex relationships.
KeywordsDivision of housework Same-sex couples Family economics Gender roles
The author is grateful to Henning Best, Tim Birkenbach, Norman Braun, Josef Brüderl, Freya Gassmann, Marita Jacob, Thorsten Kneip and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Bauer, G. (2015). Graphical display of regression results. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), The Sage handbook of regression analysis and causal inference (pp. 205–224). Los Angelos, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands & wives—The dynamics of married living (2 Auflage ed.). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
- Browning, M., Chiappori, P.-A., & Weiss, Y. (2014). Economics of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Heaphy, B., Donovan, C., & Weeks, J. (2002). Sex, money and the kitchen sink. In S. Jackson, & S. Scott (Eds.), Gender. A Sociological Reader (pp. 248–258, Routledge Student Readers). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Höpflinger, F., & Charles, M. (1990). Innerfamiliale Arbeitsteilung: Mikro-soziologische Erklärungsansätze und empirische Beobachtungen. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 2, 87–113.Google Scholar
- McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple. How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
- Schulz, F. (2010). Verbundene Lebensläufe. Partnerwahl und Arbeitsteilung zwischen neuen Ressourcenverhältnissen und traditionellen Geschlechterrrollen (Life Course Research). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2004). Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay male couples in civil unions compared with those not in civil unions and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(2), 275–286. doi: 10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar