Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 417–444 | Cite as

Social Background and Becoming a Parent in Sweden: A Register-Based Study of the Effect of Social Background on Childbearing in Sweden

  • Johan DahlbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this study, I introduce three measures of social background, namely occupational class, social status, and parental education, into fertility research. The objective is to examine whether these dimensions of social background affect entry into parenthood even after controlling for several potential pathways. I estimate event history models on first birth rates using data, which include all Swedes born in 1960. The results show that each of the three dimensions of social background has a clear bivariate association with the risk of becoming a parent, both for men and for women. Parental education has the strongest effect of class and status background, and the latter two do not affect the entry into fatherhood when the effects of all dimensions of social background are estimated simultaneously. Much of the remaining association between social background and fertility persists when controlling for own educational history, mother’s age at first birth, and father’s mean incomes. The results also show that higher social background leads to postponement of childbearing but that it has no effect on the final likelihood of ever become a parent. The influence of social background on fertility is stronger for women than for men.

Keywords

Social background Stratification Intergenerational transmission of fertility Class reproduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Juho Härkönen, Gunnar Andersson, Sunnee Billingsley, Elizabeth Thomson, Robert Erikson, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions. Financial support from the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) via the Swedish Initiative for Research on Microdata in the Social and Medical Sciences (SIMSAM): Stockholm University SIMSAM Node for Demographic Research (Grant Registration Number 340-2013-5164) and Linnaeus Center on Social Policy and Family Dynamics in Europe (SPaDE) (Grant 349-2007-8701), and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research for Working Life and Social research (Grant 2010-0831) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Aarskaug Wiik, K. (2009). ‘You’d Better Wait!’—socioeconomic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation. European Sociological Review, 25, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamse, A. F., Morrison, P. A., & Waite, L. J. (1988). Beyond stereotypes: Who becomes a single teenage mother? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 628–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, G. (2000). The impact on labor force participation on childbearing behavior: Pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing developments in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden from the 1970s to the 1990s: A comparison. Demographic Research, 3, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., et al. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the nordic countries. Demographic Research, 20, 313–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderton, D. L., Tsuya, N. O., Bean, L. L., & Mineau, D. G. P. (1987). Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns. Demography, 24, 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aronson, J. (1992). Women’s sense of responsibility for the care of old people: “But who else is going to do it?”. Gender & Society, 6, 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J., & Wolff, F. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2(3), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Axinn, W., Clarkberg, M. E., & Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family size preferences. Demography, 31, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (1992). The influence of parental resources on the timing of the transition to marriage. Social Science Research, 21, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 58, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barber, J. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers’ preferences for family and nonfamily behavior. Social Forces, 79, 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barber, J. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research, 30, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bean, F. D., & Swicegood, C. G. (1979). Intergenerational occupational mobility and fertility: A reassessment. American Sociological Review, 44, 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernardi, F. (2001). Is it a timing or a probability effect? Four simulations and an application of transition rate models to the analysis of unemployment exit. Quality & Quantity, 35(3), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bernhardt, E. (1989). Social background, education and childbearing before 30: The experience of the Stockholm Metropolitan birth cohort. Stockholm University: Department of Sociology, Project Metropolitan Research Report No 28.Google Scholar
  19. Bernhardt, E., & Hoem, B. (1985). Cohabitation and social background: Trends observed for Swedish women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population, 1, 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blackwell, D. (2000). Marital homogamy in the United States: The influences of individual and paternal education. Social Science Research, 27, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blossfeld, H. P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Böhlmark, A., & Lindquist, M. J. (2006). Life-cycle variations in the association between current and lifetime income: Replication and extension for Sweden. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(4), 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review, 24, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (1990). Transmission of marital and family quality over the generations: The effect of parental divorce. Journal of Divorce, 13(2), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2001). Class, mobility and merit: The experience of two British birth cohorts. European Sociological Review, 17, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1475–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Breen, R., & Rottman, D. B. (1995). Class stratification: A comparative perspective. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  31. Buis, M. L. (2012). The composition of family background: The influence of the economic and cultural resources of both parents on the offspring’s educational attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2012). Causes, classes and cases. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3, 292–296.Google Scholar
  33. Chan, T. W. (2010). The social status scale: Its construction and properties. In T. W. Chan (Ed.), Social status and cultural consumption (pp. 28–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2004). Is there a status order in contemporary British society? Evidence from the occupational structure of friendship. European Sociological Review, 20, 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review, 72, 512–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cnattingius, S., & Stephansson, O. (2002). The epidemiology of stillbirth. Seminars in Perinatology, 26, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dahlberg, J. (2013). Family influence in fertility: A longitudinal analysis of sibling correlations in first birth risk and completed fertility among Swedish men and women. Demographic Research, 29(9), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Easterlin, R. A. (1973). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.Google Scholar
  40. Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 6(3), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elo, I. T. (2009). Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18, 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). Individual or family? Results from two approaches to class assignment. Acta Sociologica, 35, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 33, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  46. Furstenberg, F. F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. P. (1987). Adolescent mothers in later life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Geyer, S., Hemström, Ö., Peter, R., & Vågerö, D. (2006). Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 804–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). On sociology (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Goldthorpe, J. H. (2012). Back to class and status: Or why a sociological view of social inequality should be reasserted. Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas, 137(1), 201–215.Google Scholar
  50. Goldthorpe, J. H., & McKnight, A. (2006). The economic basis of social class. In S. Morgan, D. B. Grusky, & G. S. Fields (Eds.), Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research from sociology and economics (pp. 109–136). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hank, K. (2002). Regional social contexts and individual fertility decisions: A multilevel analysis of first and second births in western Germany. European Journal of Population, 18, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hardy, J. B., Astone, N. M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Shapiro, S., & Miller, T. L. (1998). Like mother, like child: Intergenerational patterns of age at first birth and associations with childhood and adolescent characteristics and adult outcomes in the second generation. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1220–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Härkönen, J., & Bihagen, E. (2011). Occupational attainment and career progression in Sweden. European Societies, 13, 451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoem, J. M. (1986). The impact of education on modern family-union initiation. European Journal of Population Revue Européenne de Démographie, 2(2), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoem, J. M. (1993). Classical demographic methods of analysis and modern event-history techniques. In IUSSP: 22nd International population conference, Montreal, Canada, 3, 281–291.Google Scholar
  56. Hoem, B. (2000). Entry into motherhood in Sweden: The influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986–1997. Demographic Research, 2(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
  57. Hoem, B., & Hoem, J. (1992). The disruption of marital and non- marital unions in contemporary Sweden. In J. Trussell, R. Hankinson, & J. Tilton (Eds.), Demographic applications of event history analysis (pp. 61–93). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hoem, J. M., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2006a). Education and childlessness: The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research, 14(15), 331–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hoem, J. M., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2006b). Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research, 14(16), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hoffman, S. D. (1998). Teenage childbearing is not so bad after all… or is it? A Review of the New Literature, Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sander, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference. Teachers College Record, 97(2), 310–331.Google Scholar
  62. Horwitz, S. M. C., Klerman, L. V., Kuo, H. S., & Jekel, J. F. (1991). Intergenerational transmission of school-age parenthood. Family Planning Perspectives, 23, 168–172, 177.Google Scholar
  63. Huang, L., Sauve, R., Birkett, N., Fergusson, D., & van Walraven, C. (2008). Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 147, 435–443.Google Scholar
  64. Johnson, M. K. (2002). Social origins, adolescent experiences, and work value trajectories during the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 80, 1307–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Johnson, N. E., & Stokes, C. S. (1976). Family size in successive generations: The effects of birth order, intergenerational change in lifestyle, and familial satisfaction. Demography, 13, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Johnstone, D. B. (1986). Sharing the costs of higher education: Student financial assistance in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, France, Sweden, and the United States. New York: Institution College Board Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Jonsson, J. O., & Erikson, R. (1997a). Klasstruktur och social rörlighet under 1900-talet. In J. Vogel, L. Häll (Eds.), Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-årsperspektiv 19751995. Rapport 91 i serien Levnadsförhållanden (pp. 491–511). Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.Google Scholar
  68. Jonsson, J. O., & Erikson, R. (1997b). Social snedrekrytering i svensk skola. In J. Vogel, L. Häll (Eds.), Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-årsperspektiv 19751995. Rapport 91 i serien Levnadsförhållanden (pp. 513–527). Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.Google Scholar
  69. Kahn, J. R., & Anderson, K. E. (1992). Intergenerational Patterns of teenage fertility. Demography, 29, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kohler, H. P., & Philipov, D. (2001). Variance effects in the Bongaarts–Feeney formula. Demography, 38, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kolk, M. (2014). Understanding transmission of fertility across multiple generations: Socialization or socioeconomics? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 35, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 7, 127–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kravdal, Ø. (1994). The importance of economic activity, economic potential and economic resources for the timing of first births in Norway. Population Studies, 48, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lappegård, T., & Rønsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population, 21, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Leridon, H. (2004). Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Human Reproduction, 19, 1549–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The impact of parents’ and spouses’ education on divorce rates in Norway. Demographic Research, 10, 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lyngstad, T. H. (2006). Why do couples with highly educated parents have higher divorce rates? European Sociological Review, 22, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Manlove, J. (1997). Early motherhood in an intergenerational perspective: The experiences of a British cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Manzoni, A., Härkönen, J., & Mayer, K. U. (2014). Moving on? A growth-curve analysis of occupational attainment and career progression patterns in West Germany. Social Forces, 92(4), 1285–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Martin, S. P. (2004). Women’s education and family timing: Outcomes and trends associated with age at marriage and first birth. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality. Russell Sage: New York.Google Scholar
  83. McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Michael, R. T., & Brandon Tuma, N. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography, 22(4), 515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moore, K. A., Miller, B. C., Glei, D., & Morrison, D. R. (1995). Early sex, contraception, and childbearing: A review of recent research. Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  86. Murphy, M., & Knudsen, L. B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies, 56, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Murphy, M., & Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population, 17, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Prandy, K. (1998). Class and continuity in social reproduction: An empirical investigation. The Sociological Review, 46, 340–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Prandy, K. (1999). Class, stratification and inequalities in health: A comparison of the registrar-general’s social classes and the Cambridge scale. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21, 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Prandy, K., & Lambert, P. (2003). Marriage, social distance and the social space: An alternative derivation and validation of the Cambridge scale. Sociology, 37, 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pullum, T. W., & Wolf, D. A. (1991). Correlations between frequencies of kin. Demography, 28, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rijken, A. J., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies, 63, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rossi, P. P. H., & Rossi, A. S. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  94. Skirbekk, V., Kohler, H.-P., & Prskawetz, A. (2004). Birth month, school graduation and the timing of births and marriages. Demography, 41, 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sobotka, T. (2006). In pursuit of higher education, do we postpone parenthood too long? Gender Medicine, 3(183–186), 29.Google Scholar
  96. Stanfors, M., & Scott, K. (2013). Intergenerational transmission of young motherhood. Evidence from Sweden, 1986–2009. The History of the Family, 18(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Steenhof, L., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherlands for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from municipal registers. Population Studies, 62, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thalberg, S. (2011). Does money matter? Childbearing behaviour of Swedish students in the 1980s and 1990s. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 46, 5–19.Google Scholar
  100. Torssander, J., & Erikson, R. (2009). Marital partner and mortality: The effects of the social positions of both spouses. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63(12), 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Torssander, J., & Erikson, R. (2010). Stratification and mortality: A comparison of education, class, status, and income. European Sociological Review, 26, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Vossensteyn, H. (2009). Challenges in student financing: State financial support to students—A worldwide perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 34(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weber, M. (1922/1968). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  104. Yaish, M., & Andersen, R. (2012). Explaining cross-national variation in social mobility: The role of economic and political context. Social Science Research, 41, 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zill, N., & Nord, C. (1994). Running in place: How American families are faring in a changing economy and an individualistic society. Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  106. Zimmer, B. G., & Fulton, J. (1980). Size of family, life chances, and reproductive behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Demography Unit, Department of SociologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations