Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 207–230 | Cite as

Between Flows and Places: Using Geodemographics to Explore EU Migration Across Neighbourhoods in Britain

  • Albert SabaterEmail author
Article

Abstract

During the past decade, the growing significance of EU migrants in Britain has attracted considerable media and policy attention. While the rhetoric and public policy debate has focused on national and regional levels, surprisingly, little is known about the emerging settlement patterns of EU migrants at the local level. This paper sheds some light on this important issue by exploring the socio-spatial characteristics of the places of destination/residence of EU migrants and, in doing so, reveals the extent to which the concentration-dispersal framework applies to their settlement pattern. To evaluate whether and in what ways EU migrants have settled across neighbourhoods in Britain, 2001 and 2011 census estimates as well as geodemographic data are used. The findings suggest that EU migrants have consolidated their national presence in Britain because of their growing numbers and unprecedented geographical dispersal. While EU migrants’ settlement does not seem to translate into strong clustering patterns, diverging socio-spatial experiences are found among the largest groups (Polish, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish).

Keywords

EU migrants Socio-spatial experiences Geodemographics Britain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Census output is Crown copyright, and all tables containing Census data, and the results of analysis, are reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. The author alone is responsible for the interpretation of the data. The author is grateful to David McCollum Sharon Leahy and Georgina Lloyd for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper and to two anonymous reviewers for their useful insights and suggestions.

References

  1. Arango, J., et al. (2009). The making of an immigration model: Inflows, impacts and policies in Southern Europe, IDEA working papers 9. Warsaw: Centre of Migration Research.Google Scholar
  2. Boden, P., & Rees, P. (2010). Using administrative data to improve the estimation of immigration to local areas in England. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 173(4), 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castells, M. (1989). The Information City. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Champion, T. (2007). Defining “urban”: The disappearing urban-rural divide. In H. S. Geyer (Ed.), International handbook of urban policy, volume 1: Contentious global issues (pp. 22–37). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Cockings, S., Harfoot, A., Martin, D., & Hornby, D. (2011). Maintaining existing zoning systems using automated zone-design techniques: Methods for creating the 2011 Census output geographies for England and Wales. Environment and Planning A, 43(10), 2399–2418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Lima, P. (2008). Rural minority ethnic experiences: Housing and health. Race Equality Foundation Briefing Paper. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  7. Dorling, D., et al. (2007). Poverty, wealth and place in Britain, 1968 to 2005. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Favell, A. (2008). The new face of East–West migration in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(5), 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Findlay, A., Geddes, A., & McCollum, D. (2010). International migration and recession. Scottish Geographical Journal, 126(4), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finney, N., & Simpson, L. (2009). Sleepwalking to segregation? Challenging myths about race and migration. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford, R., Goodwin, M. J., & Cutts, D. (2012). Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 51(2), 204–234.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, J. E., Morosanu, L., & Szilassy, E. (2012). The racialization of the new European migration to the UK. Sociology, 46(4), 680–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garapich, M. P. (2008). The migration industry and civil society: Polish immigrants in the United Kingdom before and after the EU enlargement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(5), 735–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, A. E., Jones, P., & Owen, D. (2007). Migrant workers in the East Midlands labour market. Coventry: Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  15. General Register Office for Scotland. (2014). Census geography comparison with England & Wales. http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files2/geography/2011-census/geography-bckground-info-comparison-of-thresholds.pdf
  16. Harris, R., Sleight, R., & Webber, R. (2005). Geodemographics, GIS and neighbourhood targeting. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Hickman, M., Crowley, H., & Mai, N. (2008). Immigration and social cohesion in the UK. The rhythms and realities of everyday life. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. HM Government. (2014). Review of the balance of competences between the United Kingdom and the European Union—Single market: Free movement of persons. BIS/14/987, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and Foreign and Commonwealth Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332668/bis-14-987-free-movement-of-services-balance-of-competencies-report.pdf
  19. Home Office. (2009). Accession Monitoring Report May 2004–March 2009. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  20. Jentsch, B., & Simard, M. (Eds.). (2009). International migration and rural areas: Cross-national comparative perspectives. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, R., Forrest, J., & Poulsen, M. (2002). Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities? Urban Studies, 39(4), 591–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lymperopoulou, K. (2013). The area determinants of the location choices of new immigrants in England. Environment and Planning A, 45(3), 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, D. (2002). Geography for the 2001 Census in England and Wales. Population Trends, 108, 7–15.Google Scholar
  24. Massey, D. S. (Ed.). (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Massey, D. S. (2015). Segregation and the Perpetuation of Disadvantage. In Linda Burton & David Brady (Eds.), The oxford handbook of poverty and society (forthcoming). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mateos, P., & Aguilar, A. G. (2013). Socioeconomic segregation in Latin American cities. A geodemographic application in Mexico City. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 4(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
  28. May, J., Wills, J., Datta, K., Evans, Y., Herbert, J., & McIlwaine, C. (2007). Keeping London working: Global cities, the British state, and London’s new migrant division of labour. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2), 151–167.Google Scholar
  29. McCollum, D., & Findlay, A. M. (2015). Flexible’ workers for ‘flexible’ jobs? The labour market function of A8 migrant labour in the UK. Work, Employment and Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2012). Free movement of workers and labour market adjustment: Recent experiences from OECD countries and the European Union. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Office for National Statistics. (2009). Interim report on the potential use of Department for Work and Pensions data to improve population and migration statistics. http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/niall/ons_paper.pdf
  32. Office for National Statistics. (2012). Changes to output areas and Super output areas in England and Wales, 2001 to 2011. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/geography/products/census/report--changes-to-output-areas-and-super-output-areas-in-england-and-wales--2001-to-2011.pdf
  33. Office for National Statistics. (2013). 2011 Census analysis - comparing rural and urban areas of England and Wales. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_337939.pdf
  34. Peixoto, J., et al. (2013). Immigrants, markets and policies in Southern Europe. In M. Okólski (Ed.), European immigrations: Trends, Structures and policy implications (pp. 107–148). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Phillimore, J., Thornhill, J., & Goodson, L. (2008). Migrants from A8 countries and housing in the East Midlands. Report from the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies for Decent and Safe Homes and Government Office East Midlands, University of Birmingham. http://migrationtoolkit.emcouncils.gov.uk/upload/resources/CURS_DASH%20Migrant%20Workers%20Research%20Final.docx
  36. Phillips, D., & Harrison, M. (2010). Constructing an integrated society: Historical lessons for tackling black and minority ethnic housing segregation in Britain. Housing Studies, 25(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  37. Popke, J. (2011). Latino migration and neoliberalism in the US South: Notes toward a rural cosmopolitanism. Southeastern Geographer, 51(2), 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rath, J., van de Kamp, M., Slootman, M., & Tzaninis, I. (2013). Issues of ‘Normalcy’ around social and spatial mobility. Final report of the NICIS/Platform31 research program on social mobility: Individuals, groups, neighbourhoods. Amsterdam: Center for Urban Studies, University of Amsterdam. http://www.uva.nl/binaries/content/documents/personalpages/s/l/m.w.slootman/nl/tabblad-een/tabblad-een/cpitem%5B8%5D/asset?1384440356671
  39. Recchi, E. (2008). Cross-state mobility in the EU: Trends, puzzles and consequences. European Societies, 10(2), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Recchi, E., & Favell, A. (Eds.). (2009). Pioneers of European integration: Citizenship and mobility in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, D. (2010). Neighbourhood effects of new immigration. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2451–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson, D., & Walshaw, A. (2012). New migration, neighbourhood effects and community change. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council, Connected Communities Programme.Google Scholar
  43. Rogaly, B. (2008). Intensification of workplace regimes in British horticulture: The role of migrant workers. Population Space and Place, 14(6), 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruhs, M., & Anderson, B. (Eds.). (2010). Who needs migrant workers? (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sabater, A., & Massey, D. S. (2014). Contrasting patterns of migration and settlement. In A. Domingo, A. Sabater, & R. Verdugo (Eds.), Demographic analysis of Latin American immigrants in Spain, Applied Demography Series (Vol. 5, pp. 55–82). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salt, J. (2012). International migration and the United Kingdom: Report of the United Kingdom SOPEMI correspondent to the OECD 2012. London: Migration Research Unit, University College London.Google Scholar
  47. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, S. (2007) The ability of ‘world city’ theory to explain con-temporary patterns and processes on intra-Europan labour migration. http://www.migrationonline.cz/
  49. Stenning, A., et al. (2006). Assessing the local and regional impacts of international migration. Newcastle: Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
  50. Tamas, K., & Munz, R. (2006). Labour migrants unbound? EU Enlargement, transitional measures, and labour market effects. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies.Google Scholar
  51. Verwiebe, R. (2008). Migration to Germany: Is a middle class emerging among intra-European migrants? Migration Letters, 5(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  52. White, A. (2011). Polish families and migration since EU accession. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, R., Holloway, S., & Ellis, M. (2011). Reconsidering both diversity and segregation: A reply to Poulsen, Johnston and Forrest, and to Peach. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 167–176.Google Scholar
  54. Zelinsky, W., & Lee, B. A. (1998). Heterolocalism: An alternative model of sociospatial behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities. International Journal of Population Geography, 4(4), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmermann, K. F. (2009). Labour Mobility and the Integration of European Labour Markets. IZA discussion paper series No. 3999. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography and GeosciencesUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland, UK
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Sustainable Development, ESRC Centre for Population ChangeUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations