European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 127–153

Labor Market Laws and Intra-European Migration: The Role of the State in Shaping Destination Choices

Article

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between migrants’ destination choices and the formal labor market access afforded by multiple potential host countries in the context of the EU’s eastward enlargement. We use an index of labor market access laws combined with data on migration from new EU member states into the existing states of the EU and EFTA from 2004 through 2010 to test whether (1) migrants are attracted to destinations that give them greater formal labor market access, (2) migration flows to any given destination are influenced by the labor market policies of competing destinations, and (3) the influence of labor market laws on migrant flows is mediated by social networks, language ability, and educational level. Our data support the first two propositions and partly support the third: Migration between origin/destination pairs was positively associated with the loosening of destination labor market restrictions, while negatively associated with the loosening of competing destinations’ labor market restrictions. In addition, the influence of destination labor market access appears to be weaker for destinations in which migrants have larger existing co-national networks, and for migrants from countries with languages that are more similar to the destination language, although we do not discern a clear mediating effect of education level. Our models also include variables for a set of economic indicators, social welfare spending, geographic distance, and historical relationships, and the estimated coefficients on these variables are largely in line with theoretical predictions. By combining rich EU data with a unique approach to evaluating competing legal regimes, the analysis helps us better understand how law shapes migration in a multi-destination world.

Keywords

Migration Migrant preferences European expansion 

Supplementary material

10680_2015_9341_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (210 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 210 kb)

References

  1. Adsera, A, & Pytliková, M. (forthcoming). The role of language in shaping international migration. The Economic Journal. Google Scholar
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.Google Scholar
  3. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.Google Scholar
  4. Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Özden, C. (2011). Diasporas. Journal of Development Economics, 95(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belot, M., & Ederveen, S. (2012). Cultural barriers in migration between OECD countries. Journal of Population Economics, 25(3), 1077–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belot, M., & Hatton, T. (2008). Immigrant selection in the OECD. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
  7. Bertoli, S., & Fernández-Huertas Moraga, J. (2013). Multilateral resistance to migration. Journal of Development Economics, 102, 79–100.Google Scholar
  8. Bijak, J. (2010). Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis Series. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.Google Scholar
  10. Borjas, G. J. (1987). Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. American Economic Review, 77(4), 531–553.Google Scholar
  11. Borjas, G. J. (1989). Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review, 23(3), 457–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borjas, G. J. (2006). Native internal migration and the labor market impact of immigration. Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 221–258.Google Scholar
  13. Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 22–64.Google Scholar
  14. Card, D. (2005). Is the new immigration really so bad? The Economic Journal, 115(507), 300–323.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, X., Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (2007). Explaining U.S. immigration, 1971–1998. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cobb-Clark, D., & Connolly, M. (1997). The worldwide market for skilled migrants: Can Australia compete? International Migration Review, 31(3), 670–693.Google Scholar
  17. Cornelius, W., Martin, P., & Hollifield, J. (1994). Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. DeWaard, J., Kim, K., & Raymer, J. (2012). Migration systems in Europe: Evidence from harmonized flow data. Demography, 49(4), 1307–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2002). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Directive 94/80/EC on the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2008). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Directive 2004/38/ec on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2009). Five years of an enlarged EU: Economic achievements and challenges. Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, L. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92(2), 353–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fussell, E., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The limits to cumulative causation: International migration from Mexican urban areas. Demography, 41(1), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giulietti, C., Guzi, M., Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2013). Unemployment benefits and immigration: Evidence from the EU. International Journal of Manpower, 34(1/2), 24–38.Google Scholar
  27. Grogger, J., & Hanson, G. H. (2011). Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants. Journal of Development Economics, 95(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hailbronner, K. (2007). Free movement of EU nationals and Union citizenship. In R. Cholewinski, R. Perruchoud, & E. MacDonald (Eds.), International migration law: Developing paradigms and key challenges. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4). 1029–1054.Google Scholar
  30. Hanson, G. H., & McIntosh, C. (2010). The great Mexican emigration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, J., & Todaro, M. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review, 60, 126–142.Google Scholar
  32. Hatton, T. J. (2005). Explaining trends in UK immigration. Journal of Population Economics, 18(4), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hatton, T. J., & Leigh, A. (2011). Immigrants assimilate as communities, not just as individuals. Journal of Population Economics, 24(2), 389–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (2002). Out of Africa? Using the past to project African emigration pressure in the future. Review of International Economics, 10(3), 556–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henderson, J. A. (1975). Expanding the negligence concept: Retreat from the rule of law. Indiana Law Journal, 51, 475.Google Scholar
  36. Hicks, J. R. (1932). The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Joppke, C. (2001). The evolution of alien rights in the United States, Germany, and the European Union. In T. A. Aleinikoff & D. B. Klusmeyer (Eds.), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  38. Kim, K., & Cohen, J. E. (2010). Determinants of international migration flows to and from industrialized countries: A panel data approach beyond gravity. International Migration Review, 44(4), 899–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993) Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.Google Scholar
  41. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2002). Worlds in motion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Massey, D. S., & Espinosa, K. E. (1997). What’s driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 939–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayda, A. M. (2010). International migration: A panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. Journal of Population Economics, 23(4), 1249–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011) Notes on CEPII’s distances measures (geodist). CEPII Working Paper 2011-25.Google Scholar
  45. McKenzie, D., Theoharides, C., & Yang, D. (2014). Distortions in the international migrant labor market: Evidence from filipino migration and wage responses to destination country economic shocks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 49–75.Google Scholar
  46. Munshi, K. (2003). Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the US labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 549–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ortega, F., & Peri, G. (2013). The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration. Migration Studies, 1(1), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Palloni, A., Massey, D. S., Ceballos, M., Espinosa, K., & Spittel, M. (2001). Social capital and international migration: A test using information on family networks. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1262–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmer, J. (2014). The changing legal value of naturalization: A set of indices quantifying the gaps between immigrants’ and citizens’ rights in 22 OECD countries, working paper.Google Scholar
  51. Pedersen, P. J., & Pytliková, M. (2008). EU enlargement: Migration flows from Central and Eastern Europe into the Nordic countries-exploiting a natural experiment, working Paper, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  52. Pedersen, P. J., Pytliková, M., & Smith, N. (2006). Migration into OECD countries 1990-2000. In T. M. Smeeding (Ed.), Immigration and the transformation of Europe (pp. 43–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pedersen, P. J., Pytliková, M., & Smith, N. (2008). Selection and network effects: Migration flows into OECD countries 1990-2000. European Economic Review, 52, 1160–1186.Google Scholar
  54. Peri, G., & Sparber, C. (2009). Task specialization, immigration, and wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(3), 135–169.Google Scholar
  55. Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Portes, A. (1997). Immigration theory for a new century: Some problems and opportunities. International Migration Review, 31, 799–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Portes, A., & Walton, J. (1981). Labor, class, and the international system. Waltham: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
  59. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415.Google Scholar
  60. Schuck, P. H. (2000). Law and the study of migration. In J. F. Hollifield & C. B. Brettell (Eds.), Migration theory: Talking across disciplines. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  61. Shachar, A. (2006). The race for talent: Highly skilled migrants and competitive immigration regimes. New York University Law Review, 81, 148–206.Google Scholar
  62. Simpson, N. B., & Sparber, C. (2012). The short-and long-run determinants of less-educated immigrant flows into US states. Southern Economic Journal, 80(2), 414–438.Google Scholar
  63. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93.Google Scholar
  64. Stan Development Team (2014a). Rstan: the R interface to Stan, version 2.5.0. http://mc-stan.org/rstan.html.
  65. Stan Development Team (2014b). Stan: A C++ library for probability and sampling, version 2.5.0. http://mc-stan.org/.
  66. Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.Google Scholar
  67. Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. State, B., Rodriguez, M., Helbing, D., & Zagheni, E. (2014). Migration of professionals to the US. In L. M. Aiello & D. McFarland (Eds.), Social Informatics (pp. 531–543). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148.Google Scholar
  70. Waldinger, R. D., & Lichter, M. I. (2003). How the other half works. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Zolberg, A. R. (1989). The next waves: Migration theory for a changing world. International Migration Review, 23(3), 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREAFCerdanyola del VallèsSpain
  2. 2.ICREA Movement Ecology Laboratory (CEAB-CSIC)BlanesSpain
  3. 3.VSB-Technical University OstravaOstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations