Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 365–382 | Cite as

Age Differences in Unions: Continuity and Divergence Among Swedish Couples Between 1932 and 2007

  • Martin KolkEmail author
Article

Abstract

Age differences in unions have important implications for a number of demographic and societal outcomes. This study examines patterns of age differences in Swedish marital and childbearing unions during the twentieth century, using administrative register data on all first births (1932–2007) and first marriages (1968–2007). All first births are further analyzed by civil status of the parents, and non-married and married parents are compared. The study discusses the theoretical and methodological importance of distinguishing between age heterogamy (absolute age differences) and age hypergamy (gendered age differences) and examines changes in both measures. Results show that age differences in unions changed only slowly over the twentieth century. Age hypergamy decreased at a slow pace, while age heterogamy showed a u-shaped pattern with increasing heterogamy the last decades. These results are confirmed in quantile analyses. Standardizations are also done to examine the influence of age distribution of first unions. Trends for marital versus childbearing unions are similar overall.

Keywords

Age differences Union formation Fertility Marriage Homogamy Sweden 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study is supported by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) via the Swedish Initiative for Research on Microdata in the Social and Medical Sciences (SIMSAM): Stockholm University SIMSAM Node for Demographic Research, Grant 340-2013-5164. Support was also received from STINT (The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education) and the Sweden-America Foundation. I am grateful for suggestions and comments by Gunnar Andersson, Margarita Chudnovskaya and Juho Härkönen.

References

  1. Agree, E. M., & Glaser, K. (2009). Demography of informal caregiving. In P. Uhlenberg (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 647–668). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akers, D. S. (1967). On measuring the marriage squeeze. Demography, 4(2), 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, G., & Kolk, M. (2011). Trends in childbearing and nuptiality in Sweden: An update with data up to 2007. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 46, 21–29.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., & Weedon-Fekjaer, H. (2006). The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography, 43(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, M. P., & Glass, B. L. (1985). Marital age heterogamy and homogamy, 1900 to 1980. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(3), 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstrom, T., & Lam, D. (1994). The effects of cohort size on marriage-markets in twentieth-century Sweden. In J. Ermish & N. Ogawa (Eds.), The family, the market and the state in ageing societies (p. 46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (2003). Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies: A conceptual framework. In Who Marries (Ed.), Whom? (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Bozon, M. (1991). Women and the age gap between spouses: An accepted domination? Population, 3, 113–148.Google Scholar
  9. Brückner, H., & Mayer, K. U. (2005). De-standardization of the life course: What it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? Advances in Life Course Research, 9, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1972). Differentials in marital instability: 1970. American Sociological Review, 37(6), 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bytheway, W. R. (1981). The variation with age of age differences in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(4), 923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cain, M. (1993). Patriarchal structure and demographic change. In N. Federici, K. O. Mason, & S. Sogner (Eds.), Women’s position and demographic change (Vol. International Union for the Scientific Study of Population [IUSSP], pp. 43–60). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Casterline, J. B., Williams, L., & McDonald, P. (1986). The age difference between spouses: Variations among developing countries. Population Studies, 40(3), 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charles, K. K., & Sevak, P. (2005). Can family caregiving substitute for nursing home care? Journal of Health Economics, 24(6), 1174–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drefahl, S. (2010). How does the age gap between partners affect their survival? Demography, 47(2), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, M. J., Brinton, S., & Clark, L. (2010). Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: Comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elzinga, C. H., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 23(3–4), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. England, P., & McClintock, E. A. (2009). The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review, 35(4), 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esteve, A., Cortina, C., & Cabré, A. (2009). Long term trends in marital age homogamy patterns: Spain, 1922–2006. Population, 64(1), 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent–grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogan, D. P., & Astone, N. M. (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laslett, P. (1977). Characteristics of the western family considered over time. Journal of Family History, 2(2), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marini, M. M. (1978). The transition to adulthood: Sex differences in educational attainment and age at marriage. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mercy, J. A., & Saltzman, L. E. (1989). Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1976–85. American Journal of Public Health, 79(5), 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mu, Z., & Xie, Y. (2014). Marital age homogamy in China: A reversal of trend in the reform era? Social Science Research, 44, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neugarten, B. L., & Neugarten, D. A. (1986). Age in the aging society. Daedalus, 115(1), 31–49.Google Scholar
  29. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1992). Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective. European Journal of Population, 8(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2001). Flexibility in the marriage market. Population, 13(2), 9–47.Google Scholar
  31. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2005). The age difference at marriage in England and Wales: A century of patterns and trends. Population Trends, 120, 7–14.Google Scholar
  32. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2008). Demographic decomposition of the marriage market in England and Wales 1911–1991. Journal of Biosocial Science, 40(4), 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Sigle-Rushton, W. (2005). Partner supply in Britain and the US. Population, 60(1), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden’s marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies, 65(2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Popenoe, D. (1987). Beyond the nuclear family—A statistical portrait of the changing family in Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(1), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Presser, H. B. (1975). Age differences between spouses. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(2), 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qian, Z. (1998). Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1890. Demography, 35(3), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qian, Z., & Preston, S. H. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qu, L. (1998). Age differences between brides and grooms in Australia. Family matters, 49, 27.Google Scholar
  40. Rothstein, B. (2010). Den Moderna Könsmaktsordningens Grundbult. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 102(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  41. Shorter, E. (1975). The making of the modern family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Statistics Sweden. (2011). Olika Generationers Barnafödande [Childbearing Patterns of Different Generations] (Vol. 2011:3). Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  43. Thomson, E., & Eriksson, H. (2013). Register-based estimates of parents’ coresidence in Sweden, 1969–2007. Demographic Research, 29(42), 1153–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.Google Scholar
  45. Van de Putte, B., Van Poppel, F., Vanassche, S., Sanchez, M., Jidkova, S., Eeckhaut, M., et al. (2009). The rise of age homogamy in 19th century Western Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1234–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Poppel, F., Liefbroer, A. C., Jeroen, K. V., & Smeenk, W. (2001). Love, necessity and opportunity: Changing patterns of marital age homogamy in the Netherlands, 1850–1993. Population Studies, 55(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veevers, J. E. (1988). The “Real” marriage squeeze: Mate selection, mortality, and the mating gradient. Sociological Perspectives, 31(2), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vera, H., Berardo, D. H., & Berardo, F. M. (1985). Age heterogamy in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(3), 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wheeler, R. H., & Gunter, B. G. (1987). Change in spouse age difference at marriage: A challenge to traditional family and sex roles? Sociological Quarterly, 28(3), 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Demography Unit, Department of SociologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations