Skip to main content

Family Attitudes and Fertility Timing in Sweden

European Journal of Population volume 31, pages 259–285 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Employing a novel latent attitude profile approach, as developed by Moors (Eur J Popul 24:33–57, 2008), within the theory of planned behavior, this paper models the association between attitudes and the transition to parenthood. We use survey data from the Young Adult Panel Study (1999) and linked prospective population register data (1999–2009) to investigate the family attitudes and fertility timing of a sample of three birth cohorts in Sweden, a country at the leading edge of family change in Europe. We generate latent attitude profiles of men and women based on attitudes related to the Value of Children, the Second Demographic Transition, and Competing Alternatives. We then show that compared with Children- and Partnership-Oriented individuals, the Partnership-Oriented and Non-Family-Oriented were less likely to transition to parenthood. We found greater diversity in fertility behavior by latent attitude profiles than previous work, suggesting that more attention should be given to the role of attitude profiles in determining modern-day fertility intentions and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29(8), 203–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G. (2008). Family forerunners? Family dynamics in the Nordic countries versus Europe. Paper presented at the Nordic Demographic Symposium, Helsinki.

  • Bachrach, C. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2013). A cognitive–social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, J., & Yi, Y. (1989). An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). The degree of intention formation as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(4), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(1), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J.S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 101–127.

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. Austria: Austrian Institute for Family Studies publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C., & Philipov, D. (2004). Education and the transition to motherhood: a comparative analysis of Western Europe. European Demographic Research Paper No.3. Vienna Institute of Demography.

  • Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Testa, M. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F.C., & Wilson, C. (2001). Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary Western Europe. MPIDR Working Paper, 2001(39).

  • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulatao, R. A. (1981). Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography, 18(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979). The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility. The American Economic Review, 69(3), 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., VanOrman, A., & Pilkauskas, N. (2013). Examining the antecedents of U.S. nonmarital fatherhood. Demography, 50(4), 1421–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. (2003). The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis for the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Heer, W. (1999). International response trends: results of an international survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, K., Hale, C., & Blankson, M. (1994). Family structure, function, and the early transition to fatherhood in Great Britain: Identifying antecedents using longitudinal data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 844–852.

  • Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dommermuth, L., Klobas, J., & Lappegård, T. (2011). Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions. Advances in Life Course Research, 16(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvander, A.-Z., & Johansson, M. (2012). What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. T. (1988). The value of children and the transition to parenthood. Marriage & Family Review, 12(3–4), 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N. (1997). The immigrant family: cultural legacies and cultural changes. International Migration Review, 31(4), 961–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of “lowest-low” fertility? Population and Development Review, 35(4), 663–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J., & Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work: policies for reconciling parenthood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G. (1993). Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. Sociological Methodology, 23, 217–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W., & Hoffman, M. L. (1973). The value of children to parents. In J. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population (pp. 19–76). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29(11), 275–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, R., Dykstra, P. A., & Jansen, M. D. (2008). Pathways into childlessness: evidence of gendered life course dynamics. Journal of Biosocial Science, 40(6), 863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a life-course perspective. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: the efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. B. (2011). Comparing the TPB and the TDIB framework. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., Velde, E. T., & Force, E. R. S. T. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, J., Budig, M. J., & Moller, S. (2007). Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 9(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, G. (2008). The valued child. In search of a latent attitude profile that influences the transition to motherhood. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 24(1), 33–57. doi:10.2307/40271477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. J. (2006). Working mothers and the welfare state: religion and the politics of work-family policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., & Taylor, M. G. (2006). Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2012). Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies, 66(3), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). OECD factbook 2011–2012: economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden’s marriage revival: an analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 65(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipov, D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 25, 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesnel-Vallée, A., & Morgan, S. P. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 497–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A, Jr, Furstenberg, F. F, Jr, & Rumbaut, R. G. (2008). On the frontier of adulthood: theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A, Jr, & Ray, B. (2010). What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. Transition to Adulthood, 20(1), 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2010). Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Studies in Family Planning, 41(4), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, T. (2004). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review, 30(2), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19(6), 85–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. (2011). Olika generationers barnafödande [Childbearing patterns of different generations]. Demographic reports. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

  • Statistics Sweden. (2013). Summary of Population Statistics 1960–2012. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. J. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in northern, western and southern Europe: an update. Demographic Research, S3(3), 45–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E., & Eriksson, H. (2013). Register-based estimates of parents’ coresidence in Sweden, 1969–2007. Demographic Research, 29(42), 1153–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Balen, F., & Inhorn, M. C. (2002). Interpreting infertility, a view from the social sciences. In F. van Balen & M. C. Inhorn (Eds.), Interpreting infertility: childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies in global perspective (pp. 3–32). Berkeley: UCLA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kaa, D. J. (1994). The second demographic transition revisited: theories and expectations. In G. C. N. Beets (Ed.), Population and family in the low countries 1993 (pp. 81–126). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, F. B., van Balen, F., & Hermanns, J. M. A. (2006). Migrants and the meaning of parenthood: involuntary childless Turkish migrants in The Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 21(7), 1832–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful suggestions from Eva Bernhardt, Helga de Valk, Dana Garbarski, Kia Sorensen, Elizabeth Thomson, Kimberly Turner; two anonymous reviewers; and the participants of the international conference on “Changing Families and Fertility Choices,” sponsored by the Research Council of Norway and Statistics Norway (Oslo, Norway; June 2013). This work was supported in part by the European Research Council Starting Grant project “Families of migrant origin: a life course perspective” (project number 263829) and a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Veni grant (grant number 016.125.054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Jennifer A. Holland

  2. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Jennifer A. Holland

  3. Department of Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Renske Keizer

  4. Research Institute of Child Development and Education (CDE), Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Renske Keizer

Authors
  1. Jennifer A. Holland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renske Keizer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Holland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holland, J.A., Keizer, R. Family Attitudes and Fertility Timing in Sweden. Eur J Population 31, 259–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9333-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9333-x

Keywords

  • Transition to parenthood
  • Fertility
  • Attitudes
  • Sweden
  • Latent class analysis
  • Administrative register data