Skip to main content

Family Trajectories and Health: A Life Course Perspective

Trajectoires familiales et santé: une approche sous l’angle de parcours de vie

European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie volume 29, pages 357–385 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of family trajectory, i.e., the whole sequence of family events during the life course of early adults in shaping their health outcomes. Union formation and childbearing are jointly considered, since the two life domains are highly connected and their intersections may have an effect on health outcomes. Data come from wave I and wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) in the United States. The paper is divided in two parts. The first part focuses on family transitions and investigates if changes in timing (when events happen), quantum (what and how many transitions), and ordering (in what order), have an effect on the health of young women. In the second part, life course trajectories are classified into six groups representing different ideal-types of family trajectories and the association of these trajectories with health outcomes is explored. Results suggest that family trajectories play an important role on different health outcomes. Controlling for selection and background characteristics, precocious and “non-normative” transitions are associated with lower self-reported health and higher propensity of smoking and drinking.

Résumé

Cet article étudie le rôle des trajectoires familiales, i.e., la totalité des séquences d’évènements familiaux survenus au cours de la vie de jeunes adultes, sur l’état de santé de ces derniers. La formation d’union et la procréation sont pris en compte conjointement car ces deux dimensions sont étroitement liées et leurs croisements peuvent avoir un effet sur la santé. Les données sont issues des vagues 1 et 4 de l'enquête longitudinale nationale sur la santé des adolescents (Add Health) réalisée aux Etats-Unis. Cet article est subdivisé en deux parties. La première partie s’intéresse aux transitions familiales et examine si des changements dans le calendrier (quand les événements arrivent-ils), le type et le nombre (quelles transitions et combien) et l’ordre (dans lequel elles surviennent) ont un effet sur la santé des jeunes femmes. Dans la deuxième partie, les trajectoires de vie sont classées en six catégories représentant les idéal-types des trajectoires familiales, et les associations entre ces trajectoires et l’état de santé sont étudiées. Les résultats indiquent que les trajectoires familiales jouent un rôle important sur l’état de santé. En contrôlant les effets de sélection et les caractéristiques individuelles, les transitions précoces et non normatives sont associées à un moins état de santé auto-déclaré et une tendance plus élevée de consommation de tabac et d’alcool.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work–family trajectories. European Journal of Population, 23(3–4), 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, G. (2007). Can we promote child well-being by promoting marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1326–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. (2007). Strengthening marriage is an appropriate social policy goal. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 952–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P., Landale, N., & Havasevich-Brooks, T. (2008). Precursors of young women’s family formation pathways. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1271–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Kane, J. B. (2011). Life course pathways and the psychosocial adjustment of young adult women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barban, N., & Billari, F. (2012). Classifying life course trajectories: A comparison of latent class and sequence analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 61(5), 765–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Kuh, D. (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(2), 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. (2001). The analysis of early life courses: Complex descriptions of the transition to adulthood. Journal of Population Research, 18(2), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. (2005). Life course analysis: Two (complementary) cultures? Some reflections with examples from the analysis of the transition to adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C., Fürnkranz, J., & Prskawetz, A. (2006). Timing, sequencing, and quantum of life course events: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Population, 22(1), 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L., Martin, T., & Sweet, J. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, J., Boyle, M., Offord, D., & Racine, Y. (2003). Stress, social support and depression in single and married mothers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 442–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 15(2), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., Bessie, W., & Paula, E. (2006). Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43(4), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, M. E., Beck, A. N., & Meadows, S. O. (2009). Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(5), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, C., & Liefbroer, A. (2007). De-standardization of family–life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population, 23(3), 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, C., Rahmann, S., & Wang, H. (2008). Algorithms for subsequence combinatorics. Theoretical Computer Science, 409(3), 394–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J., & Pevalin, D. (2005). Early motherhood and later partnerships. Journal of Population Economics, 18(3), 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francesconi, M., Jenkins, S. P., & Siedler, T. (2010). The effect of lone motherhood on the smoking behavior of young adults. Health Economics, 19(11), 1377–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F. (1976). Unplanned parenthood: The social consequences of teenage childbearing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F. (1998). When will teenage childbearing become a problem? The implications of western experience for developing countries. Studies in Family Planning, 29(2), 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). Non-normative life course transitions: Reflections on the significance of demographic events on lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K. (2009). Conceptualizing life course trajectories. In G. H. Elder & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, marital status, and mental illness. Social Forces, 51(1), 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfon, N., & Hochstein, M. (2002). Life course health development: An integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. The Milbank Quarterly, 80(3), 433–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., & Eileen, B. (2010). An integrative approach to health. Demography, 47(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., Lee, H., & Deleone, F. (2010). Marriage and health in the transition to adulthood: Evidence for African Americans in the Add Health study. Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1106–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. (1978). The variable order of events in the life course. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A., & White, H. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. (1995). Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(4), 1065–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koball, H., Moiduddin, E., & Henderson, J. (2010). What do we know about the link between marriage and health? Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1019–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, K., Lee, G., & DeMaris, A. (2003). Union formation and depression: Selection and relationship effects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4), 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. (1988). Determinants of marital instability: A Cox-regression model. Applied Economics, 20(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnard, L. (2006). Setting cost in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 389–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenshtein, V. I. (1965). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D., Graefe, D., & Brown, J. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L., & Waite, L. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography, 30(4), 653–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, R. (2005). The structure of the life course: Classic issues and current controversies. Advances in Life Course Research, 9, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T., & Bumpass, L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2007). Should government promote marriage? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 951–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar, D., & Anyadike-Danes, M. (2002). Predicting successful and unsuccessful transitions from school to work by using sequence methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 165(2), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, S. (2009). Family structure and fathers’ well-being: Trajectories of mental health and self-rated health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(2), 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miech, R., & Shanahan, M. (2000). Socioeconomic status and depression over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(2), 162–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J. (2002). Parenthood and health: The pivotal and optimal age at first birth. Social Forces, 81(1), 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J. (2005). Age at first birth, health, and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouw, T. (2005). Sequences of early adult transitions: A look at variability and consequences. In R. Settersten, F. Furstenberg, & R. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage, and trajectories in well-being and relationships. NSFH Working Paper No. 93. Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research, UCLA. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/34f1h2nt.

  • Nock, S. (1981). Family life-cycle transitions: Longitudinal effects on family members. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(3), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. (2005). Marriage as a public issue. The Future of Children, 15(2):13–32. Marriage and Child Wellbeing.

  • O’Connell, M., & Rogers, C. (1984). Out-of-wedlock births, premarital pregnancies and their effect on family formation and dissolution. Family Planning Perspectives, 16(4), 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, M., Gilchrist, L., Gillmore, M., & Lohr, M. (2006). Predicting variation in the life course of adolescent mothers as they enter adulthood. J Adolescent Health, 39(1), 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A., & Liefbroer, A. (1997). Beyond marital status: Partner history and well-being in old age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccarreta, R., & Billari, F. C. (2007). Clustering work and family trajectories by using a divisive algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 170(4), 1061–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, M. S., Weden, M. M., Favreault, M. M., & Waldron, H. (2011). The protective effect of marriage for survival: A review and update. Demography, 48(2), 481–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R., Swicegood, C., & Rosenfeld, R. (1987). Disorder in the life course: How common and does it matter? American Sociological Review, 52, 785–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., Landale, N., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44(4), 807–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenborn, C. (2004). Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002. Advance data.

  • Seltzer, J. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 921–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, M. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons, J., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-Being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons, J., Liefbroer, A., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1254–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. (2002). Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors. Demography, 39(2), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Bachrach, C. (2000). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, I., Hughes, M., & Brooks, T. (1996). Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Social Science & Medicine, 43(1), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, E. D., & Ritschard, G. (2009). The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal?. Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1–2), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., & Umberson, D. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., Goesling, B., & Avellar, S. (2007). The effects of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. Technical report, Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Wu, L. (2000). Some comments on “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect”. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Hart, R. (2002). The effects of marital and nonmarital union transition on health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due to Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Nicola Barban

Authors
  1. Nicola Barban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Barban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barban, N. Family Trajectories and Health: A Life Course Perspective. Eur J Population 29, 357–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9296-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9296-3

Keywords

  • Sequence analysis
  • Life course analysis
  • Health outcomes
  • Transition to adulthood

Mots-clés

  • Analyse de séquence
  • Analyse de parcours de vie
  • État de santé
  • Transition vers l’âge adulte