Advertisement

Fertility and Women’s Employment: A Meta-analysis

Fécondité et travail des femmes: une méta-analyse
  • Anna MatysiakEmail author
  • Daniele Vignoli
Article

Abstract

Our research objective was to systematise the existing literature on the relation between fertility and women’s employment at the micro-level. Instead of carrying out a traditional literature review, we conducted a meta-analysis. This allowed us to compare estimates from different studies standardised for the country analysed, the method applied, control variables used and sample selected. We focused on two effects: the impact of work on fertility and the impact of young children on employment entry. First, we found a high variation in the studied effects among the institutional settings, reflecting the existence of a north–south gradient. Second, we observed a significant change in the effects over time. Finally, we demonstrated that a failure to account for the respondent’s social background, partner and job characteristics tends to produce a bias in the estimated effects.

Keywords

Fertility Women’s employment Meta-analysis Welfare regimes 

Résumé

Notre objectif est de faire la synthèse de la littérature concernant la relation entre fécondité et travail des femmes à l’échelle micro, et nous avons effectué une méta-analyse plutôt qu’une synthèse traditionnelle. Ceci nous a permis de comparer les estimations de différentes études en ajustant pour le pays, la méthode d’analyse, les variables de contrôle, et l’échantillon. Nous avons considère deux effets: l’impact du travail sur la fécondité, et l’impact des jeunes enfants sur l’entrée de la mère dans la vie professionnelle. En premier lieu, nous avons observé une forte variation des effets en fonction du contexte d’étude, avec l’existence d’un gradient Nord-Sud. En second lieu, nous démontrons que la non prise en compte de la position sociale du sujet, de celle de son partenaire et des caractéristiques de l’emploi tend à conduire à des biais dans l’estimation des effets.

Mots-clés

Fécondité Travail des femmes Méta-analyse Systèmes de protection sociale 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was to a large extent prepared during our stay at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research and continued when Anna Matysiak was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science. The library of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research is gratefully acknowledged for having provided us with the articles for this analysis. The article profited remarkably from discussions with Gunnar Andersson, Gabriele Doblhammer, Irena E. Kotowska, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Gerda Neyer, Beata Nowok and Silvana Salvini as well as the suggestions of the two anonymous reviewers of this journal. This work was presented at the “Interdisciplinary Workshop on Meta-Analysis” at the University of Cologne (Germany), 26–27 October 2006, whose participants provided us with very useful comments. We would also like to thank Susann Backer for the language editing.

References

  1. Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2004). Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berinde, D. (1999). Pathways to a third child in Sweden. European Journal of Population, 15, 349–378.Google Scholar
  7. Bernardi, F. (2001). The employment behaviour of married women in Italy. In H.-P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary societies (pp. 121–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernardi, F., & Nanio, T. (2005). Globalization and the transition to adulthood in Italy. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klizing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 349–374). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Blossfeld, H.-P., Drobnič, S., & Rohwer, G. (2001). Spouses’ employment careers in (West) Germany. In H.-P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary societies (pp. 53–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industralised nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Card, D., & Kruger, A. B. (1995). Time-series minimum-wage studies: A meta-analysis. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 238–243. Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
  12. Castles, F. G. (2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD Countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corijn, M. (2001). Couples’ Careers in flanders. In H.-P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary societies (pp. 98–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Drobnič, S. (2000). The effects of children on married and lone mothers’ employment in the United States and (West) Germany. European Sociological Review, 16(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drobnič, S., Blossfeld, H.-P., & Rohwer, G. (1999). Dynamics of women’s employment patterns over the family life course: A comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drobnič, S., & Wittig, I. (1997). Part-time work in the United States of America. In H.-P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization. Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 289–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Engelhardt, H., Kögel, T., & Prskawetz, A. (2004). Fertility and women’s employment reconsidered: A macro-level time-series analysis for developed countries, 1960–2000. Population Studies, 58(1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Felmlee, D. H. (1993). The dynamic interdependence of women’s employment and fertility. Social Science Research, 22, 333–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geisler, E., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2005). Müttererwerbstätigkeit in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Eine Analyse mit den Mikrozensen 1991–2002. MPIDR Working Paper No. 2005-033.Google Scholar
  22. Giannelli, G. C. (1996). Women’s transitions in the labour market: A competing risks analysis on German panel data. Journal of Population Economics, 9(3), 287–300.Google Scholar
  23. Grimm, M., & Bonneuil, N. (2001). Labour market participation of French women over the life cycle, 1935–1990. European Journal of Population, 17(3), 235–260.Google Scholar
  24. Grunow, D., Hofmeister, H., & Buchholz, S. (2006). Late 20th-century persistence and decline of the female homemaker in Germany and the United States. International Sociology, 21(1), 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grunow, D., & Leth-Sørensen, S. (2006). Danish women’s unemployment, job mobility and non-employment, 1980s and 1990s: Marked by globalization? In: H.-P. Blossfeld & H. Hofmeister (Eds.), Globalisation, uncertainty and women’s careers. An international comparison (pp. 142–170). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hofmeister, H. (2006). Women’s employment transitions and mobility in the United States: 1968 to 1991. In H.-P. Blossfeld & H. Hofmeister (Eds.), Globalisation, uncertainty and women’s careers. An international comparison (pp. 302–328). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Kögel, T. (2004). Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really change its sign? Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kögel, T. (2006, June). An explanation of the positive correlation between fertility and female employment across Western European countries. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Liverpool, The UK.Google Scholar
  30. Kotowska, I. E. (1999). Drugie przejście demograficzne i jego uwarunkowania. In I. E. Kotowska (Ed.), Przemiany demograficzne w Polsce w kontekście drugiego przejścia demograficznego (pp. 11–33). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German fertility and family survey. Demographic Research Special Collection, 3, 275–318.Google Scholar
  32. Kreyenfeld, M. (2005). Economic uncertainty and fertility postponement—evidence from German panel data. MPIDR Working Paper 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Lesthaeghe, R. (1991). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. IPD Working Paper No 2, Vrije Universiteit, Brussel.Google Scholar
  34. Lesthaeghe, R. (1992). The second demographic transition in western countries. In M. K. Oppenheim & A. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Leth-Sørensen, S., & Rohwer, G. (2001). Work careers of married women in Denmark. In H.-P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary societies (pp. 261–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lück, D., & Hofäcker, D. (2003). Rejection and acceptance of the male breadwinner model: Which preferences do women have under which circumstances? Globalife Working Paper No 60, University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
  37. Matysiak, A., & Steinmetz, S. (2006). Who follows whom? Female employment patterns in West Germany, East Germany and Poland. MZES Working Paper No 94, Mannheimer Zentrum fuer Europaeische Sozialforschung, Mannheim.Google Scholar
  38. Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2006). High fertility or childlessness: Micro-level determinants of reproductive behaviour in Italy. Population, 4, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muszyńska, M. (2007). Structural and cultural determinants of fertility in Europe. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2000). Gender culture and social change in the European context. In S. Duncan & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), Gender work and culture in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Rindfuss, R. R., Guzzo, K., & Morgan, S. P. (2003). The changing institutional context of low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Róbert, P., & Bukodi, E. E. (2005). The effects of the globalization process on the transition to adulthood in Hungary. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klizing, M. Mills & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 176–214). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salvini, S. (2004). Low Italian fertility: The Bonaccia of Antilles? Genus, LX(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
  45. Santow, G., & Bracher, M. (2001). Deferment of the first birth and fluctuating fertility in Sweden. European Journal of Population, 17, 343–363.Google Scholar
  46. Siemieńska, R. (1997). Wartości i postawy warunkujące obecność kobiet na rynku pracy. In R. Siemienska (Ed.), Wokół problemów zawodowego równouprawnienia kobiet i mężczyzn. Warsaw: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  47. Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stropnik, N. (2003). Impact of transition on family policy. In I. E. Kotowska & J. Jóźwiak (Eds.), Population of Central and Eastern Europe—challenges and opportunities. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.Google Scholar
  49. Stuck, A. E., Walthert, J. M., Nikolaus, T., Büla, C. J., Hohmann, C., & Beck, J. C. (1999). Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  51. Van de Kaa, D. J. (1988). The second demographic transition revisited: Theories and expectations. Paper presented at the conference on Population and European Society by the Commission of the European Economic Community and the European University Institute, Florence, 7–9 December.Google Scholar
  52. Vemer, E. C., Marilyn, G., Lowrence, H., & Cooper, H. (1989). Marital satisfaction in remarriage: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(3), 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner, M., & Weiβ, B. (2006). On the variation of divorce risks in Europe: Findings from a meta-analysis of European longitudinal studies. European Sociological Review, Advanced Access published on August 18.Google Scholar
  54. Waldorf, B., & Byrun, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the impact of age structure on fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 18, 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weichselbaumer, D., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of the international gender gap. Journal of Economics Survey, 19(3), 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weller, R. H. (1977). Wife’s employment and cumulative family size in the United States, 1970 and 1960. Demography, 14(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang, J., & Yu, K. F. (1998). What’s the relative risk? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(19), 1690–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Statistics and DemographyWarsaw School of EconomicsWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of DemographyUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations