Advertisement

Firm Authority and Workplace Democracy: a Reply to Jacob and Neuhäuser

  • Iñigo González-RicoyEmail author
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Workplace democracy, which is attracting renewed political and philosophical interest, is often advocated on two intertwined views. The first is that the authority relation of employee to firm is akin to that of subject to state, such that reasons favoring democracy in the state likewise apply to the firm. The second is that, when democratic controls are absent in the workplace, employees are liable to objectionable forms of subordination by their bosses, who may then issue arbitrary directives on matters ranging from pay to the allocation of overtime and to relocation and promotion.

Daniel Jacob and Christian Neuhäuser (2018) have recently submitted these views to careful criticism in this journal.1Jacob and Neuhäuser (JN, for short) argue, on the one hand, that the parallel between firms and states is unwarranted. For, unlike managerial authority, state authority is final. The state grants firms their legal status and subjects their authority to its regulations, which citizens in...

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Keith Breen, Jahel Queralt, and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for comments on a previous version of the article. Research for this article was completed under project PGC2018-095917-A-I00 on 'Justice at Work: A Normative Analysis of Nonstandard Forms of Work' funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities.

References

  1. Anderson E (2017) Private government. How employers rule our lives (and why we Don't talk about it). Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry B (2007) The cringing and the craven: freedom of expression in, around, and beyond the workplace. Bus Ethics Q 17(2):263–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breen K (2015) Freedom, republicanism, and workplace democracy. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 18:470–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cordelli C (2017) Democratizing organized religion. J Polit 79:576–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahl RA (1985) A preface to economic democracy. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. González-Ricoy I (2014a) The republican case for workplace democracy. Soc Theory Pract 40:232–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. González-Ricoy I (2014b) Firms, states, and democracy: a qualified defense of the parallel case argument. Law, Ethics and Philosophy 2:32–57Google Scholar
  8. González-Ricoy I (2018) Ownership and control rights in democratic firms–a republican approach. Rev Soc Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2018.1552792
  9. Hsieh N-h (2005) Rawlsian justice and workplace republicanism. Soc Theory Pract 31:115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacob D, Neuhäuser C (2018) Workplace democracy, market competition and republican self-respect. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 21:927–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolodny N (2014) Rule over none II: social equality and the justification of democracy. Philos Public Aff 42:287–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Landemore H, Ferreras I (2016) In defense of workplace democracy: towards a justification of the firm-state analogy. Political Theory 44:53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leipold B. (2017). Citizen Marx. The Relationship between Karl Marx and Republicanism. PhD dissertation. Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. McMahon C (2008) The public authority of organization and business corporations. In: Brenkert GG, Beauchamp TL (eds) Oxford handbook of business ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Singer A (2018) The political nature of the firm and the cost of norms. J Polit.  https://doi.org/10.1086/697122
  16. Vickers L (2008) Religious freedom, religious discrimination and the workplace. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat de Barcelona, Department of PhilosophyBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations