Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1151–1163 | Cite as

Contractualism and the Non-Identity Problem

  • Elizabeth Finneron-Burns
Article

Abstract

This paper argues that T.M. Scanlon’s contractualism can provide a solution to the non-identity problem. It first argues that there is no reason not to include future people in the realm of those to whom we owe justification, but that merely possible people are not included. It then goes on to argue that a person could reasonably reject a principle that left them with a barely worth living life even though that principle caused them to exist, and that current people could not justify creating people with barely worth living lives on the grounds that it caused those people to exist.

Keywords

Non-identity problem Contractualism T.M. Scanlon Future generations Intergenerational justice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Versions of this paper were presented at the Universities of Oxford, Pavia, and Manchester; I am grateful to these audiences. I am also very grateful to Simon Caney and David Miller, Tim Campbell and the anonymous reviewers for Ethical Theory and Moral Practice for extremely helpful written comments on earlier drafts. This work was undertaken with the financial support of the Swedish Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Belshaw C (2000) Identity and disability. J Appl Philos 17(3):263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benatar D (2006) Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finneron-Burns E (2015) What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics.Google Scholar
  4. Kumar R (2009) Wronging future people. In: Gosseries A, Meyer LH (eds) Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Kumar R (2015) Risking and wronging. Philos Public Aff 43(1):27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McMahan J (2009) Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In: Roberts MA, Wasserman DT (eds) Harming future persons: ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Mulgan T (2006) Future people : a moderate consequentialist account of our obligations to future generations. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Parfit D (2011) On what matters, vol 2. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scanlon TM (1998) What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Weinberg RM (2008) Identifying and dissolving the non-identity problem. Philos Stud 2008(137):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Woodward J (1986) The non-identity problem. Ethics 96(4):804–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Futures StudiesStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations