Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 755–772 | Cite as

There Should Not Be Shame in Sharing Responsibility: An Alternative to May’s Social Existentialist Vision

Article
  • 165 Downloads

Abstract

Some of the greatest harms perpetrated by human beings—mass murders, for example—are directly caused by a small number of individuals, yet the full force of the transgressions would not obtain without the indirect contributions of many others. To combat such evils, Larry May (1992) argues that we ought to cultivate a sense of shared responsibility within communities. More specifically, we ought to develop a propensity to feel ashamed of ourselves when we choose to be associated with others who transgress. Grant that we ought to assume greater moral responsibility for contributing to harms that we do not directly commit. My goal is to challenge May’s claim that we should move towards a shame culture, and to argue that we ought to focus on cultivating empathy-based care and guilt instead. An established research program spearheaded by June Tangney (Tangney, Stuewig, & Mashek, 2007) has shown that individuals who are disposed to feel shame are more likely to hide from scrutiny, blame others, get angry, and become aggressive. Cultivating shame, in short, is a recipe for increasing antisocial behavior. Policies that promote feelings of empathy-based care and guilt, however, seem better designed to achieve the desired result, namely, minimizing the harms caused by groups.

Keywords

Shame Empathy Guilt Social existentialism Sharing responsibility Larry May 

References

  1. Appiah A (1987) Racism and moral pollution. Philos Forum 18:185–202Google Scholar
  2. Barrett KC, Zahn-Waxler C, Cole PM (1993) Avoiders vs. amenders: implications for the investigation of guilt and shame in toddlerhood? Cogn Emot 7:481–505. doi:10.1080/02699939308409201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson CD (1991) The altruism question: toward a social psychological answer. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Batson CD, Ahmad NY (2009) Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Soc Iss Policy Rev 3:141–177. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01013.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite J (2000) Repentance rituals and restorative justice. J Polit Philos 8:115–131. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown R, Gonzalez R, Zagefka H, Manzi J, Cehajic S (2008) Nuestra culpa: collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:75–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan CJ, Adams GS, Monin B (2013) When cheating would make you a cheater: implicating the self prevents unethical behavior. J Exp Psychol Gen 142:1001–1005. doi:10.1037/a0030655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clore GL, Jeffery KM (1972) Emotional role playing, attitude change, and attraction toward a disabled person. J Pers Soc Psychol 23:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Hooge IE, Breugelmans SM, Zeelenberg M (2008) Not so ugly after all: when shame acts as a commitment device. J Pers Soc Psychol 95:933–943. doi:10.1037/a0011991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert M (2002) Collective guilt and collective guilt feelings. J Ethics 6:115–143. doi:10.1023/A:1015819615983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilligan J (2003) Shame, guilt, and violence. Soc Res 70:1150–1180Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman M (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huebner B (2011) Genuinely collective emotions. Eur J Philos Sci 1:89–118. doi:10.1007/s13194-010-0006-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leith KP, Baumeister RF (1998) Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. J Pers 66:1–37. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lickel B, Steele RR, Schmader T (2011) Group-based shame and guilt: emerging directions in research. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 5:153–163. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00340.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. List C, Pettit P (2011) Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. May L (1992) Sharing responsibility. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. May L (1996) The socially responsible self: social theory and professional ethics. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Nussbaum M (2004) Hiding from humanity: disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Peters JR, Geiger PJ, Smart LM, Baer RA (2014) Shame and borderline personality features: the potential mediating role of anger and anger rumination. Pers Disord 5:1–9. doi:10.1037/per0000022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pettigrove G, Parsons N (2012) Shame: a case study of collective emotion. Soc Theory Pract 38:504–530. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201238327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Piff PK, Martinez AG, Keltner D (2012) Me against we: in­group transgression, collective shame, and in­group­directed hostility. Cogn Emot 26:634–649. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.595394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prinz J (2011) Against empathy. Southern J Philos 49:214–233. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rushdie S (2005) India and Pakistan’s code of dishonor. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/10/opinion/10rushdie.html?_r=0. Accessed 9 August 2015
  25. Salmela M (2012) Shared emotions. Philos Explor 15:33–46. doi:10.1080/13869795.2012.647355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scarnier M, Schmader T, Lickel B (2009) Parental shame and guilt: distinguishing emotional responses to a child’s wrongdoings. Pers Relationship 16:205–220. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01219.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheff T, Retzinger S (1991) Emotions and violence: shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Lexington Books, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmader T, Lickel B (2006) Stigma and shame: emotional responses to the stereotypic actions of one’s ethnic ingroup. In: Levin S, van Laar C (eds) Stigma and group inequality: social psychological approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 281–286Google Scholar
  29. Shepherd L, Spears R, Manstead ASR (2013) ‘This will bring shame on our nation’: the role of anticipated group-based emotions on collective action. J Exp Soc Psychol 49:42–57. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinnott-Armstrong W (2005) You ought to be ashamed of yourself (when you violate an imperfect moral obligation). Nous Suppl: Philos Iss 15:193–208. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2005.00061.x Google Scholar
  31. Slote M (2001) Morals from motives. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slote M (2007) The ethics of care and empathy. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Slote M (2010) Moral sentimentalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Striblen C (2007) Guilt, shame, and shared responsibility. J Soc Philos 38:469–485. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00392.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stuewig J, McCloskey LA (2005) The relation of child maltreatment to shame and guilt among adolescents: psychological routes to depression and delinquency. Child Maltreat 10:324–336. doi:10.1177/1077559505279308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stuewig J, Tangney JP, Heigel C, Harty L, McCloskey L (2010) Shaming, blaming, and maiming: functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. J Res Pers 44:91–102. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tangney JP, Dearing RL (2002) Shame and guilt. The Guilford Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tangney JP, Stuewig J, Martinez AG (2014) Two faces of shame: the roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychol Sci 25:799–805. doi:10.1177/0956797613508790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tangney JP, Stuewig J, Mashek DJ (2007) Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 58:345–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tangney JP, Wagner P, Fletcher C, Gramzow R (1992) Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol 62:669–675. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomaes S, Stegge H, Olthof T, Bushman B, Nezlek JB (2011) Turning shame inside-out: “humiliated fury” in young adolescents. Emotion 11:786–793. doi:10.1037/a0023403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. von Scheve C, Salmela M (eds) (2014) Collective emotions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault (2014) Not alone: the first report of the white house task force to protect students from sexual assault. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams B (1993) Shame and necessity. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright K, GudJonsson GH, Young S (2008) An investigation of the relationship between anger and offence-related shame and guilt. Psychol Crime Law 14:415–423. doi:10.1080/10683160701770369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology ProgramWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations