Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 817–833 | Cite as

Rejecting Empathy for Animal Ethics

  • T. J. Kasperbauer
Article

Abstract

Ethicists have become increasingly skeptical about the importance of empathy in producing moral concern for others. One of the main claims made by empathy skeptics is a psychological thesis: empathy is not the primary psychological process responsible for producing moral concern. Some of the best evidence that could confirm or disconfirm this thesis comes from research on empathizing with animals. However, this evidence has not been discussed in any of the prominent critiques of empathy. In this paper, I investigate six different empirical claims commonly made about empathy toward animals. I find all six claims to be problematic, though some are more plausible than others, and argue that empathy is indeed not psychologically central to producing moral concern for animals. I also review evidence indicating that other moral emotions, particularly anger, are more strongly engaged with producing moral concern for animals, and are thus more capable of achieving various normative aims in animal ethics. The conclusion of my argument is that empathy should lose its currently privileged place.

Keywords

Empathy Moral psychology Animal ethics Emotions Anger 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper benefited from helpful comments by Clare Palmer, Linda Radzik, Gary Varner, José Bermúdez, Brandon Schmeichel, and David Wright.

References

  1. Aaltola E (2012) Animal suffering: Philosophy and culture. Palgrave, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen MW, Hunstone M, Waerstad J, Foy E, Hobbins T, Wikner B, Wirrel J (2002) Human-to-animal similarity and participant mood influence punishment recommendations for animal abusers. Soc Anim 10:267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angantyr M, Eklund J, Hansen EM (2011) A comparison of empathy for humans and empathy for animals. Anthrozoös 24:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arluke A, Sanders CR (1996) Regarding animals. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Arluke A, Sax B (1992) Understanding Nazi animal protection and the holocaust. Anthrozoös 5:6–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ascione F (1992) Enhancing children’s attitudes about the humane treatment of animals: generalization to human-directed empathy. Anthrozoös 5:176–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ascione F (1999) The abuse of animals and human interpersonal violence: Making the connection. In: Ascione FR, Arkow P (eds) Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 50–61Google Scholar
  8. Ascione F (ed) (2008) The international handbook of animal abuse and cruelty: Theory, research, and application. Purdue University Press, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen S (2011) The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Batson CD, Chang J, Orr R, Rowland J (2002) Empathy, attitudes, and action: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Pers Soc Psychol B 28:1656–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batson CD, Chao MC, Given JM (2009) Pursuing moral outrage: outrage at torture. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Batson CD, Kennedy CL, Nord LA, Stocks EL, Fleming DA, Marzette CM (2007) Anger at unfairness: is it moral outrage? Eur J Soc Psychol 37:1272–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Batson CD, Klein TR, Highberger L, Shaw LL (1995) Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol 68:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batson CD, Polycarpou MP, Harmon-Jones E, Imhoff HJ, Mitchener EC, Bednar LL, Klein LL, Highberger L (1997) Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? J Pers Soc Psychol 72:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Batt S (2009) Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: a multivariate approach. Biosci Horiz 2:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berenguer J (2007) The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environ Behav 39:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blader SL, Tyler TR (2002) Justice and empathy: What motivates people to help others? In: Ross M, Miller DT (eds) The justice motive in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 226–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Broida JP, Tingley L, Kimball R, Miele J (1993) Personality differences between pro and antivivisectionists. Soc Anim 1:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown LM, Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2006) Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biol Psychol 71:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carver CS, Harmon-Jones E (2009) Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychol Bull 135:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coplan A (2011) Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In: Coplan A (ed) Goldie (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coplan A, Goldie P (2011) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Darwall S (1998) Empathy, sympathy, care. Philos Stud 89:261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis MH, Mitchell KV, Hall JA, Lothert J, Snapp T, Meyer M (1999) Empathy, expectations and situational preferences: personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. J Pers 67:469–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donovan J (1996) Attention to suffering: a feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. J Soc Phil 27:81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eddy TJ, Gallup GG Jr, Povinelli DJ (1993) Attribution of cognitive states to animals: anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. J Soc Issues 49:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL (2006) Prosocial development. In: Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 647–702Google Scholar
  28. Eisenberg N, Miller PA (1987) The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychol Bull 101:91–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellingsen K, Zanella AJ, Bjerkås E, Indrebø A (2010) The relationship between empathy, perception of pain and attitudes toward pets among Norwegian dog owners. Anthrozoös 23:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erlanger AC, Tsytsarev SV (2012) The relationship between empathy and personality in undergraduate student’s attitudes toward nonhuman animal. Soc Anim 20:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Favre DS (2011) Animal law: Welfare interests and rights, 2nd edn. Aspen Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Filippi M, Riccitelli G, Falini A, di Salle F, Vuilleumier P, Comi G, Rocca MA (2010) The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. PLoS One 5:1–9Google Scholar
  33. Fox MA, McLean L (2008) Animals in moral space. In: Castricano J (ed) Animal subjects: An ethics reader in a post-human world. Wilfried Laurier University Press, Waterloo, pp 145–175Google Scholar
  34. Furnham A, McManus C, Scott D (2003) Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös 16:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldman A (1993) Ethics and cognitive science. Ethics 103:337–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gruen L (2004) Empathy and vegetarian commitments. In: Sapontzi SS (ed) Food for thought: The debate over eating meat. Prometheus, New York, pp 284–293Google Scholar
  37. Gruen L (2009) Attending to nature: empathetic engagement with the more than human world. Ethics Environ 14:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gruen L (2012) Navigating difference (again): Animal ethics and entangled empathy. In: Smulewics-Zucker GR (ed) Strangers to nature: Animal lives and human ethics. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 213–234Google Scholar
  39. Gutsell J, Inzlicht M (2010) Empathy constrained: prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups. J Exp Soc Psychol 46:841–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gutsell JN, Inzlicht M (2012) Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap. Soc Cogn Affect Neur 7:596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harmon-Jones E, Gable P, Peterson C (2010) The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update. Biol Psychol 84:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harmon-Jones E, Sigelman JD, Bohlig A, Harmon-Jones C (2003) Anger, coping, and frontal cortical activity: the effect of coping potential on anger-induced left frontal activity. Cognit Emot 17:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hatfield E, Rapson RL, Le YL (2009) Emotional contagion and empathy. In: Decety J, Ickes W (eds) The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Held V (2006) The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Henry BC (2006) Empathy, home environment, and attitudes toward animals in relation to animal abuse. Anthrozoös 19:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hills AM (1993) The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals. Soc Anim 1:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holton R, Langton R (1999) Empathy and animal ethics. In: Jamieson D (ed) Singer and his critics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 209–232Google Scholar
  48. Howe D (2013) Empathy: What it is and why it matters. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Klimecki O, Singer T (2013) Empathy from the perspective of social neuroscience. In: Jorge A, Vuilleumier P (eds) Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 533–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knight S, Bard K, Vrij A, Brandon D (2010) Human rights, animal wrongs? Exploring attitudes toward animal use and possibilities for change. Soc Anim 18:251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krueger F, Parasuraman R, Moody L, Twieg P, de Visser E, McCabe K, Lee MR (2013) Oxytocin selectively increases perceptions of harm for victims but not the desire to punish offenders of criminal offenses. SCAN 8:494–498Google Scholar
  52. Linzey A (ed) (2009) The link between animal abuse and human violence. Sussex Academic Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  53. Luke B (1995) Taming ourselves or going feral? Toward a nonpatriarchal metaethic of animal liberation. In: Adams CJ, Donovan J (eds) Animals and women. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 230–319Google Scholar
  54. Miller C (2009) Empathy, social psychology, and global helping traits. Phil Stud 142:247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mischel W (1968) Personality and assessment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Munro L (2005) Confronting cruelty. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  57. Neuberg SL, Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Luce C, Sagarin BJ, Lewis BP (1997) Does empathy lead to anything more than superficial helping? Comment on Batson et al. (1997). J Pers Soc Psychol 73:510–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Opotow SV (1993) Animals and the scope of justice. J Soc Issues 49:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oxley JC (2011) The moral dimensions of empathy. Palgrave Macmilan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Patterson-Kane EG, Piper H (2009) Animal abuse as a sentinel for human violence: a critique. J Soc Issues 65:589–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paul ES (2000) Empathy with animals and with humans: are they linked? Anthrozoös 13:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Plous S (1993) Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. J Soc Issues 49:11–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Preylo BD, Arikawa H (2008) Comparison of vegetarians and non-vegetarians on pet attitude and empathy. Anthrozoös 21:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Prinz J (2011a) Against empathy. South J Philos 49:214–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Prinz J (2011b) Is empathy necessary for morality? In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 519–38Google Scholar
  66. Rozin P, Lowery L, Imada S, Haidt J (1999) The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). J Pers Soc Psychol 76:574–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rozin P, Markwith M, Stoess C (1997) Moralization and becoming a vegetarian. Psychol Sci 8:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sax B (2000) Animals in the Third Reich. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Sevillano V, Aragonés JI, Schultz PW (2007) Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environ Behav 39:685–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schultz PW (2000) Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. J Soc Issues 56:391–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shapiro K (1994) The caring sleuth: portrait of an animal rights activist. Soc Anim 2:145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shelton ML, Rogers RW (1981) Fear-arousing and empathy-arousing appeals to help: the pathos of persuasion. J Appl Soc Psychol 11:366–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sheridan CL, King RG (1972) Obedience to authority with an authentic victim. P Annu Conv Am Psychol Assoc 80:165–166Google Scholar
  74. Signal T, Taylor N (2007) Attitude to animals and empathy: comparing animal protection and general community samples. Anthrozoös 20:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Slote M (2007) The ethics of care and empathy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Slote M (2010) Moral sentimentalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  77. Solomon RC (1999) Peter Singer’s Expanding Circle: Compassion and the liberation of ethics. In: Jamieson D (ed) Singer and his critics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–84Google Scholar
  78. Stueber K (2006) Rediscovering empathy: Agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Stueber K (2012) Varieties of empathy, neuroscience and the narrativist challenge to the contemporary theory of mind debate. Emot Rev 4:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stürmer S, Snyder M, Kropp A, Siem B (2006) Empathy-motivated helping: the moderating role of group membership. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32:943–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stürmer S, Snyder M, Omoto AM (2005) Prosocial emotions and helping: the moderating role of group membership. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tagar MR, Federico CM, Halperin E (2011) The positive effect of negative emotions in protracted conflict: the case of anger. J Exp Soc Psychol 47:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tam KP (2013) Dispositional empathy with nature. J Env Psychol 35:92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor N, Signal TD (2005) Empathy and attitudes towards animals. Anthrozoös 18:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thompson KL, Gullone E (2003) Promotion of empathy and prosocial behavior in children through humane education. Aus Psychol 38:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van Doorn J, Zeelenberg M, Breugelmans SM (2014) Anger and prosocial behavior. Emot Rev 6:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vitaglione GD, Barnett MA (2003) Assessing a new dimension of empathy: empathic anger as a predictor of helping and punishing desires. Motiv Emot 27:301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Westbury HR, Neumann DL (2008) Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biol Psychol 78:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Xu X, Zuo X, Wang X, Han S (2009) Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. J Neurosci 29:8525–8529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations