Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 791–808 | Cite as

Because I Believe It’s the Right Thing to Do

  • Joshua May
Article

Abstract

Our beliefs about which actions we ought to perform clearly have an effect on what we do. But so-called “Humean” theories—holding that all motivation has its source in desire—insist on connecting such beliefs with an antecedent motive. Rationalists, on the other hand, allow normative beliefs a more independent role. I argue in favor of the rationalist view in two stages. First, I show that the Humean theory rules out some of the ways we ordinarily explain actions. This shifts the burden of proof onto Humeans to motivate their more restrictive, revisionary account. Second, I show that they are unlikely to discharge this burden because the key arguments in favor of the Humean theory fail. I focus on some of the most potent and most recent lines of argument, which appeal to either parsimony, the teleological nature of motivation, or the structure of practical reasoning.

Keywords

Humeanism Humean theory of motivation Rationalism Evaluative beliefs Internalism Externalism 

References

  1. Barry M (2007) Realism, rational action, and the humean theory of motivation. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 10(3):231–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry M (2010). Humean theories of motivation. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol 5. Shafer-Landau R (ed) Oxford University Press, pp 195–223Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn S (1995/2010) Practical tortoise raising. Reprinted in Blackburn, Practical Tortoise Raising: and Other Philosophical Essays (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp 7–25. Originally published in Mind 104(416):695–711Google Scholar
  4. Broad CD (1950) Egoism as a theory of human motives. Reprinted in his Ethics and the History of Philosophy: Selected Essays, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952, pp 218–31 (Originally published in 1950: The Hibbert Journal 48:105–114)Google Scholar
  5. Burge T (1979/2007) Individualism and the mental. In Foundations of Mind, Oxford University Press, pp 100–150. (Originally published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1979), pp 73–121)Google Scholar
  6. Carroll L (1895) What the tortoise said to achilles. Mind 4(14):278–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dancy J (1993) Moral reasons. Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwall S (1983) Impartial reason. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson D (1963/1980) Actions, reasons, and causes. Essay 1 in his essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press, pp 3–19. (Originally published in 1963, Journal of Philosophy, 60(23):685–700)Google Scholar
  10. Dreier J (1997) Humean doubts about the practical justification of morality. In: Cullity G, Gaut B (eds) Ethics and practical reason. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  11. Finlay S (2007) Responding to normativity. In: Shafer-Landau R (ed) Oxford studies in metaethics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 220–39Google Scholar
  12. Haidt J & Bjorklund F (2008) Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology, vol 2. MIT Press, pp 181–218Google Scholar
  13. Holton R (2009) Willing, wanting, waiting. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hume D (1739–40/2000) A treatise of human nature. Norton DF, Norton MJ (eds). Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Hume D (1751/1998) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Beauchamp TL (ed) Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Korsgaard C (1986/1996) Skepticism about practical reason. Reprinted in Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press (1996), pp 311–34 (Originally published in 1986, The Journal of Philosophy 83(1):5–25)Google Scholar
  17. Lenman J (1996) Belief, desire and motivation: an essay in quasi-hydraulics. Am Philos Q 33(3):291–301Google Scholar
  18. Markovits J (2010) Acting for the right reasons. Philos Rev 119(2):201–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May, Joshua. Toward a naturalistic Motivational Rationalism. Monash University. http://www.joshdmay.com/wp-content/media/may-natural-rationalism.pdf. Acessed January 20, 2011
  20. McDowell J (1978/1998) Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives? Reprinted in McDowell, Mind, Value, and Reality (Harvard University Press, 1998), pp 77–94 (Originally published: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 52:13–29+31–42)Google Scholar
  21. Mele A (2003) Motivation and agency. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagel T (1970) The possibility of Altruism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Quinn W (1993/1995) Putting rationality in its place. Reprinted in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot on Moral Theory. Hursthouse R, Lawrence G, Quinn W (eds) Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1993: R. Frey and C. Morris (eds.), Value, welfare and morality. Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  24. Railton P (1997) On the hypothetical and non-hypothetical in reasoning about belief and action. In: Cullity G, Gaut B (eds) Ethics and practical reason. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 53–79Google Scholar
  25. Scanlon TM (1998) What we owe to each other. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Shafer-Landau R (2003) Moral realism: A defence. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sinhababu N (2009) The humean theory of motivation reformulated and defended. Philos Rev 118(4):465–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith M (1987) The humean theory of motivation. Mind 96(381):36–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith M (1994) The moral problem. Blackwell (First published in the U.S. in 1995)Google Scholar
  30. Smith M (1996) The argument for internalism: Reply to miller. Analysis 56(3):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Velleman JD (1992) What happens when someone acts? Mind 101(403):461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wallace RJ (1990/2006) How to argue about practical reason. Reprinted in Wallace, Normativity and the Will, Oxford University Press (2006), pp 15–42 (Originally published: 1990 in Mind 99 (395):355–385)Google Scholar
  33. Wallace RJ (2006) Moral reasons and moral fetishes: Rationalists and anti-rationalists on moral motivation. Ch. 14 in Wallace, Normativity and the Will, Oxford University Press, pp 322–342Google Scholar
  34. Wedgwood R (2002) Practical reason and desire. Australas J Philos 80(3):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams B (1979/1981) Internal and external reasons. Reprinted in Williams, Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press (1981), pp 101–113 (Originally published in Rational Action, Ross Harrison (ed), Cambridge University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
  36. Zangwill N (2003) Externalist moral motivation. Am Philos Q 40(2):143–154Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations