Abstract
Speculation about the evolutionary origins of morality has yet to show how a biologically based capacity for morality might be connected to moral reasoning. Applying an evolutionary approach to three kinds of cases where partiality may or may not be morally reasonable, this paper explores a possible connection between a psychological capacity for morality and processes of wide reflective moral equilibrium. The central hypothesis is that while we might expect a capacity for morality to include aspects of partiality, we might also expect these same aspects of the capacity to produce systemic forms of performance-based error. Understanding these errors helps point the way toward a theory of moral competence that includes aspects of both partiality and impartiality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, Brenda, Reasonable Partiality in Professional Relationships, this volume.
Andrews, Paul W., The Psychology of Social Chess and the Evolution of Attribution Mechanisms: Explaining the Fundamental Attribution Error, Evolution and Human Behavior 22 (2002), pp. 11–29.
Bader, Veit, Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism’s Main Flaws, this volume.
Brosnan, Sarah F. and Frans B.M. de Waal, Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay, Nature 425 (18 September 2003), pp. 297–299.
Daniels, Norman, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Drydyk, Jay, Globalization and Human Rights, in Jay Drydyk and Peter Penz (eds.), Global Justice and Global Democracy. Halifax: Fernwood, 1997, pp. 157–178.
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species. New York: Ballantine Books, 1999.
Little, Margaret Olivia, Seeing and Caring: The Role of Affect in Feminist Moral Epistemology, Hypatia 10(3) (1995), pp. 117–137.
Maestripieri, Dario, Is There Mother-Infant Bonding in Primates? Developmental Review 21 (2001), pp. 93–120.
Mair, Lucy, Primitive Government: A Study of Traditional Political Systems in Eastern Africa}. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
Meyers, Diana Tietjens, Emotion and Heterodox Moral Perception: An Essay in Moral Social Psychology, in Diana Tietjens Meyers (ed.), Feminists Rethink the Self. Boulder: Westview, 1997, pp. 197–218.
Miller, David, Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots, this volume
Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
Pritchard, E.E. Evans, The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People}. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1940.
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Spital, Aaron, Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation: Neglected Again, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13(2) (2003), pp. 169–174.
Stingl, Michael, Evolutionary Ethics and Moral Theory, The Journal of Value Inquiry 30 (1996), pp. 531–545.
Stingl, Michael, All the Monkeys Aren’t in the Zoo: Evolutionary Ethics and the Possibility of Moral Knowledge, in Richmond Campbell and Bruce Hunter (eds.), Moral Epistemology Naturalized. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary, Volume 26 (2000), pp. 245–265.
de Waal, Frans, Peacemaking Among Primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
de Waal, Frans, Chimpanzee Politics, Revised Edition. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stingl, M., Collier, J. Reasonable Partiality from a Biological Point of View. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 11–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3298-0
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3298-0