An ontic–ontological theory for ethics of designing social robots: a case of Black African women and humanoids

Abstract

Given the affective psychological and cognitive dynamics prevalent during human–robot-interlocution, the vulnerability to cultural-political influences of the design aesthetics of a social humanoid robot has far-reaching ramifications. Building upon this hypothesis, I explicate the relationship between the structures of the constitution social ontology and computational semiotics, and ventures a theoretical framework which I proposes as a thesis that impels a moral responsibility on engineers of social humanoids. In distilling this thesis, the implications of the intersection between the socio-aesthetics of racialised and genderised humanoids and the phenomenology of human–robot-interaction are illuminated by the figuration of the experience of a typical black rural African woman as the user, that is, an interlocutor with an industry-standard socially-situated humanlike robot. The representation of the gravity of the psycho-existential and socio-political ramifications of such woman’s life with humanoids is abstracted and posited as grounds that illustrate the imperative for roboticists to take socio-ethical considerations seriously in their designs of humanoids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The use of and meaning of “culture” implied here transcends the conception of culture as an ethnic practice. It extends to the composite stage of intellectual-epistemological practices and norms of a given society and even a Civilisation.

  2. 2.

    Ted quim, it is remarkable how the makers of the famed Sophia robot avoided to adorn “her” with hair in order to obviate ethnic connotations, and only did so in a much publicised occasion of the debut of this humanoid on China’s national CTV programme in Beijing in January 2018. See https://chinaplus.cri.cn/photo/china/18/20180115/78288_3.html.

  3. 3.

    Our usage of ‘figure’ is derived from its formulation in Deleuze as Figure or figuration (2003, pp. 1–11), and as utilised in Haraway (2003, pp. 48, 49).

  4. 4.

    The specificity of the descriptor “on the African continent”, besides being deployed to maximally illustrate the element of global digital disparities, is in part inspired by Atanga (2013).

  5. 5.

    Marti et al. (2006) and Pollini (2009, p. 169) introduce the concept of “a suspension of belief” as a dynamic at play when humans cognitively encounter humanoids, an act similarly observed in a toddler playing with dolls.

  6. 6.

    For a lucid introduction to the thought of Husserl as the foundation upon which Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre developed their phenomenological methods, see Moran (2000, pp. 1–20, 60–90).

  7. 7.

    By “ontic-illusory” I seek to denote, the immediate suggestion at an initial point of cognitive encounter that an object could be something which is not what it is, but which vision my mind overrides.

  8. 8.

    https://mir1.hitchbot.me/.

  9. 9.

    For more on the psycho-philosophical processes of human reaction to sex robot see, inter alia, Sullins (2012).

  10. 10.

    Instructively, in an apparent response to ethical sensibilities similar to what we alert in this paper Apple (Alphabet) upgraded its Siri to perform as either a male of female voice.

  11. 11.

    Jackie Snow in https://www.fastcompany.com/90212508/even-black-robots-are-impacted-by-racism [Accessed 2019-06-03].

  12. 12.

    On the maleness of Reason, see Borno (1986). I further aver that this Western Cartesian mode of rationality is replicated in computer languages and artificial intelligence.

  13. 13.

    I expounded on this subsequent conclusion in a paper presented at the Research Colloquium of the University of Fort Hare, South Africa on 7th May 2019 “Black Women and Robots: A Propaedeutic Reflection on Artificial Intelligence and African Existentiality”.

  14. 14.

    https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/?submitted=1#confirmation [Accessed 2019-09-28].

  15. 15.

    https://www.biztechafrica.com/article/sap-africa-brings-humanoid-robot-mzanzi/13892

References

  1. Addison, A., Yogeeswaran, K. & Bartneck, C. (2019). Robots Can Be More Than Black And White: Examining Racial Bias Towards Robots: In Proceedings of Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society. Honolulu: Association of Advancement of Artificial Intelligence www.aies-conference.com/wp-content/papers/main/AIES-19_paper_99.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2019.

  2. Alcoff, M. L. (1998). What should white people do? Hypatia,13(3), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanga, L. (2013). African feminism. In L. Atange, S. E. Ellece, L. Litosseliti, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 301–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartneck, C., Yogeeswaran, K., Ser, Q. M., Woodward, G., Sparrow, R., Wang, S., & Eyssel, F. (2018). Robots and racism: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot-Interaction. Chicago: IEEE. pp. 196–204. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171260

  5. Basu, A. (Ed.). (2018). The challenge of local feminisms: Women’s movements in global perspective [1995]. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berghofer, P. (2019). Husserl’s Noetics: Towards a phenomenological epistemology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology,50(2), 120–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bordo, S. (1986). The cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society,11(3), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, W., Song, W., Li, X., Zheng, S., Zhang, G., Wu, Y., et al. (2019). Interaction with social robots: Improving gaze toward face but not necessarily joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers of Psychology,10, 1503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis,58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coeckelbergh, M. (2018). Why care about robots? Empathy, moral standing, and the language of suffering, Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science,20, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (Daniel W. Smith Trans.). London: Continuum. (Original work published 1981)

  12. Derrida, J. (1974). White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy [1971]. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doumouchel, P. & Damiano, L. (2016). Living with robots (M. Bevoise Trans.) Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  14. Eco, U. (1997). The search for a perfect language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gudwin, R. & Queiroz, J. (2005). Towards an Introduction to computational semiotics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems (KIMAS 18–21 April 2005, Waltham, MA, USA). Chicago: IEEE.

  16. Haraway, D. (2003). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. Cahoone (Ed.), From modernism to post modernism (2nd ed., pp. 464–480). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harraway, D. (2003). Interview with Donna Haraway with R. Markussen, F. Oesen and N. Lykke. In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing Techscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 47–57). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harris, E. C., Prichard, S. M., & Rabins, J. M. (2009). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarie & E. Robinson, 7 Ed, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)

  20. Husserl, E. (2008). Introduction to logic and theory of knowledge: Lectures 1906/07 (C. O. Hill, Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer.

  21. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ihde, D. (2003). If phenomenology is an Albatross, is post-phenomenology possible? In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing Techscience: Matrix for Materiality (pp. 131–144). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs, N., & Huldtgren, A. (2018). Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments. Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9467-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly, M. R. (2015). Edmund Husserl. In J. B. Holbrook & C. Mitcham (Eds.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: A global resource (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 507–509). Farmington Hills MI: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marti, P., Bacigalupo, M., Giusti, L., Mennecozzi, C., Shibata, T. (2006). Socially assistive robotics in the Treatment of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Proceedings of the BioRob 2006: IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Pisa, Italy.

  26. Menary, R. A. (2010). Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In R. A. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osha, S. (2008). Philosophy and figures of the African female. Quest An African Journal of Philosophy/Revue Africaine de Philosophie,20, 155–204.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Principles of philosophy [1908]. vol 1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pollini, A. (2009). A theoretical perspective on Social Agency. A. I and Society,24(2), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Robertson, J. (2017). Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Robots, gender, family, and the Japanese Nation. Oakland CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Romesin, H. M & Bunnel, P. (1998). Biosphere, homosphere and robosphere, what does it have to do with business. Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://issuu.com/gfbertini/docs/biosphere__homosphere__and_robosphere_-_living_sys.

  33. Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P. P. (2015). A Field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P. P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9–41). London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Royakkers, L., Timmer, T., Kool, L., & van Est, R. (2018). Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics and Information Technology,20, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I. (2009). Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2563–2568.

  36. Sharkey, N., Weisberghe, A., Robbins, S., & Hancock, E. (2017). Our sexual future with robots: A foundation for responsible robotics consultation report. The Hague: Global Institute for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strasser, A. (2017). Social cognition and artificial agents. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence (pp. 106–114). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sullins, J. P. (2012). Robots, love, and sex: The ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,3(4), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tripath, A. K. (2017). Hemeneutics and technological culture: Editorial introduction. A I and Society May,32(2), 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). Artifacts and attachment: A post-script philosophy of mediation. In H. Harbers (Ed.), Inside the politics of technology: Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society (pp. 125–146). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. John Lamola.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamola, M.J. An ontic–ontological theory for ethics of designing social robots: a case of Black African women and humanoids. Ethics Inf Technol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09529-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Computational semiotics
  • Humanoids
  • Robot gender
  • Robotic ethics
  • Robot race
  • Postphenomenology