Skip to main content

The interpersonal is political: unfriending to promote civic discourse on social media

Abstract

Despite the initial promise of social media platforms as a means of facilitating discourse on matters of civic discourse, in practice it has turned out to impair fruitful conversation on civic issues by a number of means. From self-isolation into echo chambers, to algorithmically supported filter bubbles, to widespread failure to engage politically owing to psychological phenomena like the ‘spiral of silence’, a variety of factors have been blamed. I argue that extant accounts overlook the importance of interpersonal relationships to sustaining quality civic discourse on social media. Drawing on an Aristotelian account of friendship with an emphasis on the value of interpersonal difference plus the influence of interactions on individual character, I argue that a common scapegoat for the failure of civic discourse online—the variety of “unfriend” disconnection tools offered on various platforms—actually show promise at promoting better-quality civic conversation and overcoming the obstacles present on social media platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a survey of concerns involving filter bubbles and democracy, see Bozdag and van den Hoven (2015).

References

  1. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed.) (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. https://books.google.com/books?id=-Mf5XV8q6CgC&dq.

  2. Axinn, S. (1990). Moral style. The Journal of Value Inquiry,24(2), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Haohan Chen, M. B., Hunzaker, F., et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bialik, K. (2018). 14% of Americans have changed their mind about an issue because of something they saw on social media. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/15/14-of-americans-have-changed-their-mind-about-an-issue-because-of-something-they-saw-on-social-media/.

  5. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology,17(4), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briggle, A. (2008). Real friends: How the Internet can foster friendship. Ethics and Information Technology,10(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9160-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Broadbent, S. (2012). Approaches to personal communication. In H. Horst & D. Miller (Eds.), Digital anthropology (pp. 127–145). New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, M. (2017, January 5). Is 2017 the year we all quit social media? Harper’s BAZAAR. https://www.harpersbazaar.com.au/culture/how-to-quit-social-media-6235.

  10. Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (1998). Friendship and the self. Ethics,108(3), 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/233824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cocking, D., & Matthews, S. (2000). Unreal friends. Ethics and Information Technology,2(4), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011414704851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016, October 25). 2. The tone of social media discussions around politics. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech (blog). http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-tone-of-social-media-discussions-around-politics/.

  13. Elder, A. (2014). Excellent online friendships: An Aristotelian defense of social media. Ethics and Information Technology,16(4), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9354-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elder, A. M. (2018). Friendship, robots, and social media: False friends and second selves (1st ed.). Routledge research in applied ethics 9. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

  15. Fierberg, E. (2018, January 10). I quit social media for a month—and it was the best choice i’ve ever made. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/i-quit-social-media-for-one-month-it-changed-my-life-facebook-instagram-snapchat-twitter-millennial-2018-1.

  16. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly,80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication,67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fröding, B., & Peterson, M. (2012). Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship. Ethics and Information Technology,14(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9284-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garrett, R. Kelly. (2017). The ‘echo chamber’ distraction: Disinformation campaigns are the problem, not audience fragmentation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,6(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hampton, K., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014, August 26). Social media and the ‘spiral of silence.’ Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech (blog). http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/.

  21. Kendall, M. (2018, August 21). So hey can we talk again about being visible online as a woman in media and ways you can insulate yourself from things like this? Because a lot of folks are awful & unfortunately many platforms fail to be worth a damn so you have to find solutions for yourself. https://Twitter.Com/Nytimesarts/Status/1031884222661844993…. Tweet. @Karnythia (blog). https://twitter.com/Karnythia/status/1031917070517248000.

  22. Kiran, A. H. (2015). Four dimensions of technological mediation. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human/technology relations (pp. 123–140). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Midgley, M. (2013, November 28). The golden age of female philosophy|@guardianletters. The Guardian, sec. World news. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/28/golden-age-female-philosophy-mary-midgley.

  24. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication,24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior,32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vallor, S. (2010). Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology,12(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9202-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vallor, S. 2012. New social media and the virtues. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & E. Spence (Eds.), The good life in a technological age (p. 376). Routledge studies in science, technology and society. New York: Routledge.

  31. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science,359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams, B. (1981). Persons, character, and morality. In J. Rachels (Ed.), Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980 (pp. 1–19). Cambridge Paperback Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2018). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Elder.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elder, A. The interpersonal is political: unfriending to promote civic discourse on social media. Ethics Inf Technol 22, 15–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09511-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social media
  • Filter bubbles
  • Interpersonal relationships
  • Civic discourse