Arduino and access: value tensions in the maker movement

Abstract

This paper applies the construct of value tensions to an empirical investigation. Specifically, this work surfaces values tensions in data collected from a prominent online discussion forum about the Arduino electronics prototyping platform. Findings show how two value tensions—easy access versus technical opportunity, and amateur versus expert practices—inform different sentiments toward creative technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Direct quotes were not included in order to protect the identity of the commenters. While commenters likely know they are contributing to a public forum, they do not expect to be quoted in publications. An internet search could reveal the source of any quoted content and lead to other identifying information such as a personal website or twitter handle. For a further discussion on handling online user data see Kozinets’ Netnography (2010).

References

  1. Ames, M. G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Lindtner, S., Mellis, D., & Rosner, K. D. (2014). Making cultures: Empowerment, participation, and democracy-or not? In CHI14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA14) (pp. 1087–1092). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2579405.

  2. Banzi, M., & Shiloh, M. (2014). Getting started with Arduino (3rd. ed): The open source electronics prototyping platform. San Francisco: Maker Media.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bean, J., & Rosner, D. (2014). Making: Movement or brand? Interactions, 21(1), 26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bean, J., Rosner, D., & Cuartielles, D. (2015). Conversations on making. Interactions, 22(1), 22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craft, C. (2011). How the Arduino won? This is how we can kill it. Retrieved November 28, 2016, from http://www.hackaday.com, http://hackaday.com/2011/02/11/how-the-arduino-won-this-is-how-we-can-kill-it/.

  6. Dougherty, D. (2016). Free to make: How the make movement is changing our schools, our jobs and our minds. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. (in press). Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  8. Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, J., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., & Gill, B. (2007). Value tensions in design: The value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation’s groupware system. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work (GROUP07) (pp. 281–290). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316668.

  10. Morozov, E. (2014). Making it, pick up a spot welder and join the revolution. The New Yorker. Retrieved November 28, 2016, from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/01/13/making-it-2.

  11. Provost, J. (2011). How Arduino won and why it’s here to stay. Make Magazine. Retrieved on November 28, 2016, from http://makezine.com/2011/02/10/why-the-arduino-won-and-why-its-here-to-stay/.

  12. Richardson, L. (2016). Beautiful Soup. https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/:Crummy.

  13. Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, M. A., Desjardins, A., & Tanenbaum, K. (2013). Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI13) (pp. 2603–2612). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360.

  14. Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the attendees and organizers of the workshop Value Sensitive Design: Charting the Next Decade for organizing the special edition, as well as the reviewers for their insightful feedback. The author is grateful for Benji Xie and Marc Schmalz’s assistance using Beautiful Soup, as well as the support and comments from classmates and colleagues at the University of Washington.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Logler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logler, N. Arduino and access: value tensions in the maker movement. Ethics Inf Technol (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9479-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Arduino
  • Creative technology
  • Maker movement
  • Value sensitive design
  • Value tensions