Using value sensitive design to understand transportation choices and envision a future transportation system

Abstract

The increasing passengerization of transportation through shared ride services and driverless vehicles has the potential to vastly change the transportation system. Although values are sometimes considered in the design of information tools and through attitudes toward travel, the systematic approach of value sensitive design (VSD) should be used in the design of transportation infrastructure to create a sustainable transportation future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anable, J. (2005). ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy, 12(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borning, A., Waddell, P., & Forster, R. (2008). UrbanSim: Using simulation to inform public deliberation and decision-making. In H. Chen (Ed.), Digital Government: E-Government research, case studies, and implementation (pp. 439–463). Boston: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brog, W., Erl, E., Ker, I., Ryle, J., & Wall, R. (2009). Evaluation of voluntary travel behavior change: Experiences from three continents. Transport Policy, 16, 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhardt, J., & Millard-Ball, A. (2006). Who is attracted to carsharing? Transportation Research Record 1986, http://trb.metapress.com/content/gg7p102j6qx3p458/fulltext.pdf.

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Physical activity. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/healthtopics/physactivity.html.

  6. Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. (2008). Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(1), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferris, B., Watkins, K., & Borning, A. (2010). OneBusAway: Results from providing real-time arrival information for public transit. Proceedings of Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI).

  8. Garling, T., & Axhausen, K. (2003). Introduction: Habitual travel choice. Transportation, 30, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgens, P. (2005). Exercise-based transportation reduces oil dependence, carbon emissions and obesity. Environmental conservation, 32(3), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, M., Heldt, T., & Johansson, P. (2005). The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A. 40, 507–525

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, J., Schmocker, J., Bergstad, C., Fujii, S., & Garling, T. (2014). The influence of personality on acceptability of sustainable transport policies. Transportation 41, 855–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, E., Shaheen, S., & Lidicker, J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings. Transportation Research Record 2143, 150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maryland State Highway Administration (1998). Context sensitive design, thinking beyond the pavement: A National Workshop on Integrating Highway Development with Communities and the Environment. Retrieved from http://www.contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/reading/tbtp-conference/resources/tbtp-conference/.

  14. Meurer, J., Stein, M., Randall, D., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2014). Social dependency and mobile autonomy - Supporting older adults’ mobility with ridesharing ICT. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

  15. Paulssen, M., Temme, D., Vij, A., & Walker, J. (2014). Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice Transportation 41, 873–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein, M., Meurer, J., Boden, A., & Wulf, V. (2017). Mobility in later life—appropriation of an integrated transportation platform. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

  17. US Environmental Protection Agency (2013). Fast Facts US Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1990–2011. EPA-420-F-13-033a. Retrieved June 22, 2014, from http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f13033a.pdf.

  18. Watkins, K., Borning, A., Rutherford, G. S., Ferris, B., & Gill, B. (2013a). Attitudes of Bus Operators Towards Real-time Transit Information Tools. Transportation 40(5).

  19. Watkins, K., Ferris, B., Malinovskiy, Y., & Borning, A. (2013b). Beyond Context Sensitive Solutions: Using Value Sensitive Design to Identify Needed Transit Information Tools. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Urban Public Transportation Systems, Paris.

  20. Zipcar (2014). Zipcar’s annual millennial survey shows the kids are all right. Retrieved January 7, 2014, from http://www.zipcar.com/press/releases/fourth-annual-millennial-survey.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Edison Watkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watkins, K.E. Using value sensitive design to understand transportation choices and envision a future transportation system. Ethics Inf Technol (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9478-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shared use transportation
  • Public transportation
  • Mode choice
  • Traveler information
  • Values