Advertisement

Power influences upon technology design for age-related cognitive decline using the VSD framework

  • Oliver K. BurmeisterEmail author
  • David Kreps
Original Paper
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Implicit in the value sensitive design (VSD) approach is a concern for understanding, and where possible, disrupting problematic power relationships. Yet an awareness of the issues and ethics of power relations is a pre-requisite for such a concern to bear fruit. This article provides some insight into the issues, and through a case study of technology design to support care arrangements for age-related cognitive decline, illustrates how finding a satisfactory resolution can be particularly troublesome.

Keywords

Health informatics Participatory design Philosophical ethics Values Power Value sensitive design 

References

  1. Agarwal, S. D. (2015). The process of networked civic innovation: Examining the role of values, resources, and power in community-based technology projects. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  2. Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1987). Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
  3. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Co-operative design—Perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT design model. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  4. Brey, P. (2007). The technological construction of social power. Social Epistemology, 22(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burmeister, O. K. (2010). Websites for seniors: Cognitive accessibility. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 8(2), 99–113.Google Scholar
  6. Burmeister, O. K. (2012). What seniors value about online community. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1).Google Scholar
  7. Burmeister, O. K. (2016). The development of assistive dementia technology that accounts for the values of those affected by its use. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), 185–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9404-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burmeister, O. K., Weckert, J., & Williamson, K. (2011). Seniors extend understanding of what constitutes universal values. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 9(4), 238–252.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14779961111191048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, G., Huldtgren, A., Malmborg, L., Harley, D., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2015). Design for agency, adaptivity and reciprocity: Reimagining AAL and telecare agendas. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 305–338). London: Springer London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(2), 63–125.  https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heusinger, M. J. (2013). Challenges of critical and emancipatory design science research: the design of ‘Possible Worlds’ as response. In 15th International conference on enterprise information systems, Angers, 04–07 July 2013 (pp. 233–239). Institute for Systems, Technologies of Information, Control, and Communication (INSTICC).Google Scholar
  12. Kreps, D. (Ed.). (2015). Gramsci and Foucault: A Reassessment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Kreps, D., Burmeister, O. K., & Blaynee, J. (2016). Skeuomorphic reassurance: Personhood and dementia. In D. Kreps, G. Fletcher, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Technology and intimacy: Choice or coercion: 12th IFIP TC 9 international conference on human choice and computers, HCC12 2016, Salford, UK, September 7–9, 2016, Proceedings (pp. 61–71). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Schikhof, Y., Mulder, I., & Choenni, S. (2010). Who will watch (over) me? Humane monitoring in dementia care. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 410–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharkey, A. J. C. (2014). Robots and human dignity: The effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 53–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teipel, S., Babiloni, C., Hoey, J., Kaye, J., Kirste, T., & Burmeister, O. K. (2016). Information and communication technology solutions for outdoor navigation in dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 12(6), 695–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and MathematicsCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Digital BusinessUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK

Personalised recommendations