Skip to main content

A bibliometric analysis of privacy and ethics in IEEE Security and Privacy

Ethics and Information Technology volume 17, pages 153–163 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

The increasingly ubiquitous use of technology has led to the concomitant rise of intensified data collection and the ethical issues associated with the privacy and security of that data. In order to address the question of how these ethical concerns are discussed in the literature surrounding the subject, we examined articles published in IEEE Security and Privacy, a magazine targeted towards a general, technically-oriented readership spanning both academia and industry. Our investigation of the intersection between the ethical and technological dimensions of privacy and security is structured as a bibliometric analysis. Our dataset covers all articles published in IEEE Security and Privacy since its inception in 2003 to February 06, 2014 . This venue was chosen not only because of its target readership, but also because a preliminary search of keywords related to ethics, privacy, and security topics in the ISI Web of Knowledge and IEEE Xplore indicated that IEEE Security and Privacy has published a preponderance of articles matching those topics. In fact, our search returned two-fold more articles for IEEE Security and Privacy than the next most prolific venue. These reasons, coupled with the fact that both academia and industry are well-represented in the authorship of articles makes IEEE Security and Privacy an excellent candidate for bibliometric analysis. Our analysis examines the ways articles in IEEE Security and Privacy relate ethics to information technology. Such articles can influence the development of law, policy and the future of information technology ethics. We employed thematic and JK-biplot analyses of content relating privacy and ethics and found eight dominant themes as well as the inter-theme relationships. Authors and institutional affiliations were examined to discern whether centers of research activity and/or authors dominated the overall field or thematic areas. Results suggest avenues for future work in critical areas, especially for closing present gaps in the coverage of ethics and information technology privacy and security themes particularly in the areas of ethics and privacy awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Acquisti, A. (2014) From the economics of privacy to the economics of big data. Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement

  • Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy, 3(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., John, L.K., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies 42(2), 249–274. doi: 10.1086/671754

  • Allen, A. (2007). The virtuous spy: privacy as an ethical limit. Scholarship at Penn Law.

  • Azevedo, P. G., Mesquita, F. O., & Young, R. J. (2010). Fishing for gaps in science: A bibliographic analysis of Brazilian freshwater ichthyology from 1986 to 2005. Journal of Fish Biology, 76(9), 2177–2193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beel, J., & Gipp, B. (2010). Academic Search Engine Spam and Google Scholar’s Resilience Against it. Journal of electronic publishing.

  • Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.E. (2013). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review 126.

  • Diebold, F. X. (2003). Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications, econometric society monographs. Eighth world congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H, Jr. (1993). Prediction. Parsimony and Noise. American scientist, 81(5), 468–478.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D.P., Schrader, D.E., Schulze, W.D., Wicker, S.B. (2012). Economic analysis of privacy-aware advanced metering infrastructure adoption. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), 2012 IEEE PES pp 1–4

  • Gurses, S., & Diaz, C. (2013). Two tales of privacy in online social networks. Security and Privacy, IEEE, 11(3), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurses, S., Troncoso, C. & Diaz, C. (2011). Engineering privacy by design …Privacy & Data Protection.

  • Hadnagy, C., & Wilson, P. (2010). Social engineering: The art of human hacking (1st ed.). Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugl, U. (2010). Approaching the value of Privacy: Review of theoretical privacy concepts and aspects of privacy management. AMCIS.

  • Hull, G., Lipford, H.R., Latulipe, C. (2011). Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol.

  • Jackson, K., & Trochim, W. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, C., & Bowker, G. C. (2011). Values in design. CACM.

  • Lessig, L. (2006). Code. Lawrence Lessig.

  • Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. (2012). Information technology and privacy: Conceptual muddles or privacy vacuums? Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1900). X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to.... The London

  • Pham, M. C., Klamma, R., & Jarke, M. (2011). Development of computer science disciplines: A social network analysis approach. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 1(4), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N. M., & King, J. H. (2014). Big Data Ethics. Wake Forest Law Review.

  • Sar, R. K., & Al-Saggaf, Y. (2014). Contextual integrity’s decision heuristic and the tracking by social network sites. Ethics Information Technology, 16, 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, D., Ghosh, D.P., Schulze, W.D., & Wicker, S.B. (2013). Civilization and Its Privacy Discontents. In: Patterson H (ed) Privacy Law Scholars Conference, Berkeley, CA.

  • Shilton, K. (2010). Participatory sensing: Building empowering surveillance: EBSCOhost. Surveillance & Society, 8, 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stajano, F., & Wilson, P. (2009). Understanding scam victims: Seven principles for systems security. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-754, University of Cambridge.

  • Stark, L., & Tierney, M. (2013). Lockbox: Mobility, privacy and values in cloud storage. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., Jiménez-Contreras, E., Herrera, F., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2013). On the use of Biplot analysis for multivariate bibliometric and scientific indicators. arXiv.1302.0608v1.

  • Toubiana, V., Narayanan, A., Boneh, D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Adnostic: Privacy preserving targeted advertising. NDSS.

  • Toubiana, V., Subramanian, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2011). TrackMeNot: Enhancing the privacy of Web Search. arXiv 1109.4677v1

  • Turow, J. (2012). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, S. B., & Schrader, D. E. (2011). Privacy-aware design principles for information networks. Proceedings IEEE, 99(2), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Person 1, Person 2, and Person 3 of Institution for their invaluable contributions. This research was funded by a grant and there are no conflicts of interest by any author or consultant to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Jonathan Tse, Dawn E. Schrader & Dipayan Ghosh

  2. Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, UK

    David Lundie

  3. Media Studies and Production, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19147, USA

    Tony Liao

Authors
  1. Jonathan Tse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dawn E. Schrader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dipayan Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tony Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Lundie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Tse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tse, J., Schrader, D.E., Ghosh, D. et al. A bibliometric analysis of privacy and ethics in IEEE Security and Privacy . Ethics Inf Technol 17, 153–163 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9369-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9369-6

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Privacy
  • Education