Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 35–43

Considering the ethical implications of social media in social work education

  • Rana Duncan-Daston
  • Maude Hunter-Sloan
  • Elise Fullmer
Original Paper

Abstract

The ethical implications of the explosion of social media outlets for social work education are explored in this paper. Given that social work education has a dual focus, both of educating students and of socializing practitioners into the profession, the issue of the blurring between what is social and what is professional gains particular salience for both educators and students. Recommendations for educators to ethically address the need to maintain a consistent professional presence online and to avoid potentially harmful dual relationships with students are presented. These recommendations include: abstain from using social media or use only a static professional profile; use only university protected sites to promote collaboration with students in the classroom including all students to avoid any appearance of impropriety; use social media with the utmost discretion mindful of all the risks by creating a very select circle of friends, separating one’s personal site from one’s professional site; develop policies which include not friending any individual student or any current student and inform students about the policies.

Keywords

Social media Dual relationships Social work education Ethical dilemma Professional presence 

References

  1. Allwardt, D. (2011). Writing with Wiki: A cautionary tale of technology in the classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backstrom, L. (2011). The anatomy of Facebook. Retrieved 1/7/13 from http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-team/anatomy-of-facebook/10150388519243859.
  3. Beja, M. (2009). Judge Orders University of Louisville Nursing Student Reinstated. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 9/16/2012 from http://chronicle.com/article/Judge-Orders-U-of-Louisville/47925/.
  4. Bolton, J. (2011). Social workers must be ‘cautious with online social media’. Community Care website. Retrieved 11/5/12 from http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/06/10/2011/117566/social-workers-must-be-cautious-with-online-social-media.htm.
  5. Bongartz, J., Vang, C., Havrda, D., Fravel, M., McDaniel, D., & Farris, K. B. (2011). Student pharmacist, pharmacy resident, and graduate student perceptions of social interactions with faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. Retrieved 9/16/2012 from doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x/full.Google Scholar
  7. Cain, J., Fink, J. (2010). Legal and ethical issues regarding social media and pharmaceutical education. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 74 (10), 184, retrieved 11/4/12 at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058471/.
  8. Case Law Snyder v. Millersville University (2007).IAC P Center for Social Media. Retrieved 9/16/2012 from http://www.iacpsocialmedia.org/Resources/CaseLaw/CaseLawDetails.aspx?cmsid=1362&termid=133&depth=2.
  9. Chen, D. & McGeehan, P. (2012). Social media rules limit New York student-teacher contact. NY Times. Retrieved 9/17/2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/nyregion/social-media-rules-for-nyc-school-staff-limits-contact-with-students.html?pagewanted=all&_moc.semityn.www.
  10. Congress, E. (1996). Dual relationships in academia: Dilemmas for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 12 (3), 329–338. Retrieved 12/30/12 from http://www.bu.edu/ssw/files/2010/10/Dual-Relationships-in-Academia.pdf.
  11. Congress, E. (2001). Dual relationships in social work education: Report on a National Survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 37 (2). Retrieved 12/30/12 from http://website.cswe.org/publications/members-only/01-2Dual.htm.
  12. Data use policy. (12.11.12) Retrieved 1/7/13 from http://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/your-info-on-fb.
  13. Educational policy and accreditation standards. (2008). Council on social work education. Retrieved 12/17/12 from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=41861.
  14. Endacott, R., Wood, A., Judd, F., Hulbert, C., Thomas, B., & Grigg, M. (2006). Impact and management of dual relationships in metropolitan, regional, and rural mental health practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 987–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Facebook Key Facts (2012). Retrieved 9/24/2012 at http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22.
  16. Fletcher, D. (2010). Facebook: Friends without borders. Time, 175(21), 32–38.Google Scholar
  17. Gottlieb, M. C. (1993). Avoiding dual relationships: A decision-making model. Psychotherapy, 30(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hader, A. L., & Brown, E. D. (2010). Legal briefs: Patient privacy and social media. AANA Journal, 78(4), 270–274.Google Scholar
  19. Halverson, G., & Brownlee, K. (2010). Managing ethical considerations around dual relationships in small rural and remote Canadian communities. International Social Work, 53(2), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hechinger, J. (2008). College Applicants, Beware: Your Facebook Page is Showing. The Wall Street Journal.Retrieved 9/17/2012 from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122170459104151023.html.
  21. How Twitter was Born. (2009). Retrieved 9/24/2012 from http://www.140characters.com/2009/01/30/how-twitter-was-born/.
  22. Judd, R. & Johnston, L. (2012). Ethical consequences of using social network sites for students in professional social work programs. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 9 (1), 5–12. Retrieved 9/1/2012 from http://www.socialworker.com/jswve/spring12/spr122.pdf.Google Scholar
  23. Junco, R., Elavsky, M., Heiberger, G. (2012). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x.
  24. Karl, K., & Peluchette, J. (2011). “Friending” professors, parents & bosses: A Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kays, L. (2011). Must I Un-friend Facebook: Exploring the ethics of social media. The New Social Worker Online. Retrieved 9/30/2012 from http://www.socialworker.com/home/Feature_Articles/Ethics/Must_I_Un-Friend_Facebook?_Exploring_the_Ethics_of_Social_Media/.
  26. Kilpelainen, A., Paykkonen, K., & Sankala, J. (2011). The use of social media to improve social work education in remote areas. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolmes, K. (4/26/10) My private practice social media policy. Retrieved 9/29/2012 from http://www.drkkolmes.com/docs/socmed.pdf.
  28. Luo, J. S. (2009). The Facebook phenomenon: Boundaries and controversies. Primary Psychiatry, 16(11), 19–21.Google Scholar
  29. MacDonald, J., Sohn, S., & Ellis, P. (2010). Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: A dilemma for young doctors. Medical Education, 44, 805–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazer, J. P., Marphy, R. E., Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on Facebook. Communication Education, 56, (1), 1–17. Retrieved 9/16/2012 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/127029/See-You-on-Facebook.
  31. Mukherjee, D., & Clark, J. (2012). Students’ participation in social networking sites: Implications for social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Association of Social Workers (2008).Code of ethics.Washington, DC author.Google Scholar
  33. Nickel, M. (2004). Professional boundaries: The dilemma of dual and multiple relationships in rural clinical practice. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 1(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  34. Plew, M. S. (2011). Facebook Friendship between College/University Instructors and Students: Deciding Whether or Not to Allow Students as Friends, Communicating with Students, and the Individual Differences that Influence Instructors’ Impression Management on Facebook. Communication Dissertations. Paper 26. Retrieved 9/25/2012 from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/communication_diss/26.
  35. Protect Your Privacy on Facebook. (2012). Consumer Reports. Retrieved 1/7/13 from http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/facebookprivacy.htm.
  36. Reamer, F. G. (2006). Social work values and ethics. NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Reamer, F. G. (2009). Boundaries in Supervision. Social Work Today [online]. Retrieved 9/29/2012 from http://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/EoEJanFeb09.shtml.
  38. Reamer, F. G. (2010–2012). Ethics: Boundary and Dual Relationship Issues. BehavioralHealth CE. Retrieved 9/23/12 from http://www.behavioralhealthce.com/index.php/component/courses/?task=view&cid=65.
  39. Reamer, F. G. (2011). Developing a social media ethics policy. Social Work Today [online]. Retrieved 12/27/12 from http://www.socialworktoday.com/news/eoe_070111.shtml.
  40. Reamer, F. G. (2012). Ethical issues related to social workers’ use of social media and online services. National Association of Social Workers Lunchtime Series [Webinar].Google Scholar
  41. Rodriguez, J. (2011). Social media use in higher education: Key Areas to Consider for Educators. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Retrieved 9/29/2012 at http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/rodriguez_1211.htm.
  42. Schaffer, R., & Wong, C. (2012). Kaplan test prep survey finds that College Admissions Officers’ Discovery of Online Material Damaging to Applicants nearly Triples in a year. Retrieved 11/4/12 from http://kaplan-test-prep-survey-finds-that-college-admissions-officers-discovery-of-online-material-damaging-to-applicants-nearly-triples-in-a-year.
  43. Scopelliti, J., Judd, F., Grigg, M., Hodgins, G., Fraser, C., Hulbert, C., et al. (2004). Dual relationships in mental health practice: Issues for clinicians in rural settings. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solomon, N. (2011). Friendly Advice for Teachers: Beware of Facebook. National Public Radio. Retrieved 9/22/2012 at http://www.npr.org/2011/12/07/143264921/friendly-advice-for-teachers-beware-of-facebook.
  45. Stripling, J. (2010). Not so Private Professors. Inside Higher Ed [online]. Retrieved 11/4/12 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/03/02/facebook.
  46. Strutin, K. (2011). Social medial and the vanishing points of ethical and constitutional boundaries. Pace Law Review, 31(1), 227–290.Google Scholar
  47. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Policy on Student-Athlete Social Networking and Media Use (2011). Retrieved 9/22/12 at http://www.goheels.com/fls/3350/pdf/Compliance/SocialNetworkingPolicy.pdf?SPID=111196&DB_OEM_ID=3350.
  48. Tsukayama, H. (2012). Your Facebook Friends have More Friends than You. The Washington Post. Google Scholar
  49. Tunick, R., Mednick, L., & Conroy, C. (2011). A Snapshot of Child Psychologists’ social media activity: Professional and ethical practice implications and recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 440–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webster, T. (2012). The Social Habit.Edison Research. Retrieved 9/29/2012 from http://socialhabit.com/secure/downloads/attachment/the-social-habit-2012-by-edison-research/.
  51. Zur, O., & Zur. A. (2011). The Facebook Dilemma: To Accept or Not to Accept? Responding to Clients’ “Friend Requests” on Psychotherapists social networking sites. Independent Practitioner, 31 (1), 12–17. Retrieved 11/10/12 from http://www.zurinstitute.com/facebook_therapy.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rana Duncan-Daston
    • 1
  • Maude Hunter-Sloan
    • 1
  • Elise Fullmer
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social WorkRadford UniversityRadfordUSA

Personalised recommendations