Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 25–34 | Cite as

Pornography, ethics, and video games

Original Paper

Abstract

In a recent and provocative essay, Christopher Bartel attempts to resolve the gamer’s dilemma. The dilemma, formulated by Morgan Luck, goes as follows: there is no principled distinction between virtual murder and virtual pedophilia. So, we’ll have to give up either our intuition that virtual murder is morally permissible—seemingly leaving us over-moralizing our gameplay—or our intuition that acts of virtual pedophilia are morally troubling—seemingly leaving us under-moralizing our game play. Bartel’s attempted resolution relies on establishing the following three theses: (1) virtual pedophilia is child pornography, (2) the consumption of child pornography is morally wrong, and (3) virtual murder is not murder. Relying on Michael Rea’s definition of pornography, I argue that we should reject thesis one, but since Bartel’s moral argument in thesis two does not actually rely thesis one that his resolution is not thereby undermined. Still, even if we grant that there are adequate resources internal to Bartel’s account to technically resolve the gamer’s dilemma his reasoning is still unsatisfying. This is so because Bartel follows Neil Levy in arguing that virtual pedophilia is wrong because it harms women. While I grant Levy’s account, I argue that this is the wrong kind of reason to resolve the gamer’s dilemma because it is indirect. What we want is to know what is wrong with virtual child pornography itself. Finally, I suggest alternate moral resources for resolving the gamer’s dilemma that are direct in a way that Bartel’s resources are not.

Keywords

Pornography Video games Ethics Gamer’s dilemma 

References

  1. Bartel, C. (2012). Resolving the gamer’s dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 11–16.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/. Accessed September 25, 2012.
  3. Eaton, A. W. (2007). A sensible anti-porn feminism. Ethics, 117, 674–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkelhor, D., Hammer, H., & Sedlak, A. J. (2008). Sexually assaulted children: National estimates and characteristics. National incidence studies of missing, abducted, runaway, and thrown away children. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/214383.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2012.
  5. La Nauze, A., & Rush, E. (2006). Corporate paedophilia: Sexualisation of children in Australia. http://www.ncwnz.org.nz/assets/Action/Corporate-Paedophilia.pdf. Accessed December 29, 2012.
  6. Levinson, J. (2005). Erotic art and pornographic pictures. Philosophy and Literature, 29(1), 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy, N. (2002). Virtual child pornography: The eroticization of inequality. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luck, M. (2009). The gamer’s dilemma: An analysis of the arguments for the moral distinction between virtual murder and virtual paedophilia. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 31–36.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mag Uidhir, C. (2009). Why pornography can’t be art. Philosophy and Literature, 33(10), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Patridge, S. (2008a). Monstrous thoughts and the moral identity thesis. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(2), 181–193.Google Scholar
  11. Patridge, S. (2008b). Moral vices and artistic virtues: Eugene onegin and alice. Philosophia, 42(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  12. Patridge, S. (2011a). Against the moralistic fallacy: A modest proposal for a modest sentimentalism about humor. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(1), 83–94.Google Scholar
  13. Patridge, S. (2011b). The incorrigible social meaning of video games imagery: Making ethical sense of single-player video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patridge, S. (2013, forthcoming). Exclusivism and evaluation: Art, erotica, and pornography. In: H. Maes (Ed.), Pornographic art and the aesthetics of pornography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Rea, M. C. (2001). What is pornography? Noûs, 35(1), 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religion and PhilosophyOtterbein UniversityWestervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations